"If one were to start with a blank slate to design an economic system that provides for comprehensive social and ecological sustainability and regeneration, would our current system be the outcome?
"Our current economic system, whose design requires extraction, exploitation, and colonisation, has long been generating:
--Ecological devastation — evidenced by climate chaos, biodiversity loss through the 6th mass extinction, and the breaching of Planetary Boundaries, and..."
"--Social destruction — centuries of entrenched racial and gender inequality, obscene wealth and power concentration, systemic human rights deprivations — including more enslavement now than when slavery was a legal institution, and genocide."
"The ecological and the social are interconnected: especially in the western and technologically-focused cultures, people have been separated from their own sense of agency, isolated from each other and encultured into a largely extractive relationship with the natural world."
"How did this come about? Perhaps the most concise diagnosis of the problem is that our current provisioning system focuses on surplus, instead of sufficiency. Its orientation: the allocation of scarce resources rather than stewarding for the (re)generation of natural abundance."
This is a key section at the beginning of the Critique Chapter of the r3.0 "Funding Governance for Systemic Transformation" Blueprint that was published at our Conference in September. We're now posted chapters serially on our Medium channel.
"This chapter lays out our critique of the current funding governance system. The critique shows how many existing funding systems, despite their ostensible positive intent, are so bounded by the current extractive capitalist economic system..."
"...that they operate as an inadequate corrective to the dysfunctional system, in essence simply reinforcing a highly problematic status quo, and creating more illusion than practice of positive impact."
"The job of this chapter is to analyse this dysfunction, in order to set foundations for the rest of this Blueprint to explore what a more functional funding governance system, what we call a 'regenerative funding governance' system, would look like."
"If we want to govern funding flows regeneratively, the mechanisms must exist that ensure resources (including, but not exclusively, financial resources) flow to regenerative work (regenerative funding) and be supported by governance mechanisms to ensure this happens."
"The work involved must not solely be the domain of those privileged with wealth and time, as is the current case with existing philanthropic and socioeconomic systems."
HUGE NEWS: The Impact Management Platform (a network of ALL major sustainability standard setters) launched today w/a website that embeds sustainability Thresholds & Allocations throughout (including a dedicated Landing Page.)
@r3dot0 This move comes after two decades of standard setters increasingly dropping the ball on integrating sustainability thresholds & allocations at the core of sustainability reporting standards/ guidelines.
So we welcome them finally picking up the ball and ALL now running with it!
@r3dot0 "At its launch today, the Impact Management Platform (IMP) unveiled a new website with a standalone page devoted to Thresholds and Allocations that explains just how to apply these necessary elements of sustainability measurement, management, and reporting.”
To answer that question, we grounded our discussion in the @GRI_Secretariat Sustainability Context Principle as introduced in 2002 in the 2nd generation of Sustainability Reporting Guidelines.
@aheadahead1 “There is a lot of bullshit about circular economy” says Chapter Author @hanswstegeman referring to companies like Ikea and H&M that are ultimately about fast fashion and planned obsolescence.
@BeatriceCrona@vgalaz@r3dot0 "Complex dynamics, such as threshold effects (tipping points) and strong interactions resulting in cascading effects, are all known drivers of systemic failure in any complex system. Yet
state-of-the-art risk analyses still do not adequately account
for them."
@BeatriceCrona@vgalaz@r3dot0 "Furthermore, most financial risk assessment still relies on historical data, and would underestimate or completely miss the potential for thresholds and cascading effects not previously experienced…"
@kmac "the taxonomy’s purpose … is to set a very high bar based on what scientists [say] is needed ... to avoid the worst effects of climate change. Instead of assessing sectors or companies as they are now, the taxonomy identifies … what...activities ... will lead to a safer planet"
@kmac This sets it apart from other frameworks, such as the @FSB_TCFD which seek to identify risks arising from climate change.
Or the sustainability reporting project being developed by the @IFRSFoundation, which hosts accounting standards used across the world."