One thing that keeps me up at night right now is the possibility that Twitter’s potential death spiral will coincide with a major regional/national/global crisis. For better or worse, Twitter is a crucial disaster comms tool, and we don’t have a replacement for it. 1/
Twitter has been a vital source of information, networking, guidance, real-time updates, community mutual aid, & more during hurricanes, wildfires, wars, outbreaks, terrorist attacks, mass shootings...etc. It's not something that can be replaced by any existing platforms. 2/
If Twitter suddenly stops working or if huge swaths of the population can't access it during a crisis, the result will almost certainly be preventable suffering & death. Elon Musk needs to stop treating this like a playground, and start protecting it as vital infrastructure. 3/
This isn't just my opinion. There is an entire line of research exploring the use of Twitter for crisis- and disaster communication. For example, here's a great study about the significance of Twitter as a communications tool during Hurricane Harvey. 4/ sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
As this study notes, Twitter has been identified by some researchers as the "most useful social media tool" for communicating during disasters. Other platforms play a role, but Twitter is the central hub for journalists, govt, citizens, witnesses/survivors, & first responders. 5/
One of the reasons Twitter is such an important comms tool during disasters is that the nature of crises often makes it hard for traditional media to reach the public and the disaster scene. Twitter is often the first and only source of info about unfolding crises. 6/
The design of Twitter is also uniquely conducive for use during crises. Hashtags, for example, become crucial navigational tools to find relevant, up-to-date information and advisories in one central place without having to lose valuable time searching multiple websites. 7/
Effective use of Twitter by government agencies can also engender trust in those agencies during crises, which is critical when you need people to follow evacuation orders or other safety protocols. It helps keep people informed, engaged, and alive. 8/
Twitter can also play a crucial role in the healing process after crises. It gives people a space to build community resilience, which also helps us better prepare for future disasters. These are, quite literally, life-saving implications. 9/
My colleagues and I recently wrote/presented a paper on this very topic (I will share it when it's published), and one of our findings was that Twitter actually shapes the course and outcome of crises. It can literally mean the difference between life and death. 10/
I truly hope Elon Musk will see that he holds people's lives in his hands, and will start acting accordingly — because if he continues playing around with Twitter like a new toy, he *will* be responsible for deaths at some point. 11/
In the meantime, I hope you'll use this opportunity to plan ahead. Make an emergency communication plan for your family, your workplace, your neighbors, etc. Don't wait until it's too late.
The “controversy” over Sydney Sweeney is absurd and largely fake, but there’s one thing worth paying attention to — the tried and tested formula used by the right-wing outrage machine to manufacture liberal fury and then bait the left into making it a reality.
Here’s how it works:
First, invent the outrage. This usually involves picking a neutral or mildly provocative event and finding something about it to frame as being offensive to the left. In this case, the slogan (“Sydney Sweeney has great jeans”).
Second, flood the zone. Carry out a social media blitz and manufacture the appearance of outrage by gaming the algorithm with repetitive content, which will then get pushed into trending feeds and recommended videos — creating the perception that people actually care about it.
I just published the 2nd major piece in my series about algorithmic tyranny — this time, revealing how Trump & the right-wing outrage machine are not just gaming algorithms, but rewriting the rules so they can keep gaming them indefinitely. I call it the Feedback Loop Coup.
Last week, I introduced the concept of Reverse Algorithmic Capture, a tactic used to force platforms to rewrite their rules through political & legal pressure. Feedback Loop Coups are similar, except they exploit *existing* rules to rewire algorithms & seize control of your feed.
We all know by now that platforms operate on the same fundamental principle: the more engagement a post receives, the more the algorithm pushes it into other people's feeds. The faster this engagement occurs, the more "urgent" the algorithm considers it, and the wider it spreads.
I have reported on and studied some incredibly dark topics, but there’s a rabbit hole underneath the practice of AI resurrections (ie, trying to recreate dead people through AI personas) that makes QAnon look like a fun walk through the park. And no one is paying attention.
The practice of creating AI personas to represent dead people — including using their likeness, image, voice, and words — is disturbing enough on its face, and of course very rarely involves consent. But it’s also totally unregulated. Because no one is paying attention.
There are researchers out here, warning that they have seen AI resurrections stalk their family members online beyond the point that their family members want to interact with them. Imagine an AI persona of your dead loved one begging to talk to you… and having to say no.
You’ve probably heard by now that Jim Acosta interviewed an AI depiction of a dead school shooting victim on Monday. Beyond the uncanny valley stuff, there are actual harms associated with so-called griefbots — some researchers even warn of “digital hauntings” that prolong grief.
Beyond the implications for individuals, there are also profound societal implications that are not being addressed, as tech companies push these disturbing creations out there with no policies to regulate them or deal with accompanying harms.
There are also serious questions about how these AI creations are being used. For example, the father of Joaquin Oliver said he plans to create social media accounts for his AI son so he can use his voice to advocate for gun control. This is a totally new form of influence.
To follow up on my recent article about Trump’s covert manipulation of the algorithms that curate our reality, I published a 10-step guide for resisting the tyranny of the algorithm.
You have a lot of power here, but you have to learn to use it.
This is the first piece of advice I offer in the survival guide for resisting algorithmic tyranny. Until you learn the difference between entertainment and education vs covert psychological manipulation, you will remain a slave to the algorithm.
Learn the difference. Act on it.
Algorithms serve up content you like b/c they know that’s how they can hook you and get you to keep clicking, keep scrolling, and keep making them more money. They’re like digital drug dealers — and I’d argue that the effects are more insidious and corrosive than actual drugs.
Just to put a fine point on it, remember that Trump dismantled our entire cybersecurity workforce so there’s no one around to stop his algorithmic manipulation — and those who are around and might consider doing know that their job is on the line if they do.
As a reminder, within 2 months of taking office, Trump had fired over half of the government’s AI workforce. The ones who were there to put up guardrails.
And then there’s DOGE. They were given essentially unrestricted access government systems, including artificial intelligence systems. The way they used those systems was conceptually indistinguishable from the way a AI system would behave. It’s a worst case scenario.