As some of the old hands in #NAFO are doubtlessly aware, "russophobia" is a recurrent disinfo theme, and this isn't the first time it's cropped up in the context of Ukraine.
So, here's @DFRLab (<-- follow them, we like them) talking about it in '18
Back in 2017, Brian Whitmore in RFE/RL traces Russophobia back to "19th-century Slavophile poet and diplomat Fyodor Tyutchev", and reinforces an exceptionalist, righteously-aggrieved victim narrative for Russia.
Russophobia is a central concept in justifying Russia's war on Ukraine, and it's intertwined with neo-Nazism. It goes back to a surprisingly antisemitic (like, what the fuck) Russian theorist, Shafarevich, on LTU senior lecturer Robert Horvath's account.
Here, I'll show you something fun about disinformation.
Organized disinfo - like we encounter in Russia's war on Ukraine - displays two formal features that define what it is: synchrony, and diversity.
Usually, that means they post the same memes.
Sometimes, they screw up.
This is a Derek Utley-affiliated spam ring from 2019; I think they must have had someone new running things.
So instead of copy-and-pasting the same content, they shared it.
This gives you a glimpse of related accounts and pages - here, an apolitical page called "Memes".
...and another page, called, imaginatively enough, "Memes 2".
This is, I want to stress, unusual, because instead of copy-and-pasting the image - so that they all (diversity) end up mysteriously saying the same thing at the same time (synchrony) - they just straight shared it.
If you think about it, a leaderless movement of activists resisting disinformation around a war is a kind of "anti-weapon".
"True" anti-war activism the way I mean it - getting, not just talking about, outcomes like sanctions & war crimes prosecutions - doesn't fit elsewhere.
First, nuclear weapons gave the U.S. a counter-advantage against the numerically superiority of the Warsaw Pact.
This was the first offset.
"Small wars" (in the Marines' sense), COIN and asymmetric conventional conflicts led to the second offset: precision munitions.
The third offset, though this is still a somewhat novel term to some people, I think (or at least an unfashionable one) is developing American technology superiority and innovation capabilities.
This is one way we're planning to address "near-peer" adversaries, basically.
Let me show you an activist trick from the resistance years.
Interview ~150 people about a political candidate and ask them to use two, three words at the most to describe them.
Personality psychologists found that most words about people boil down to 5 dimensions -
1/4
- so in principle, every word you're hearing should cluster together with similar words.
Take those clusters together, and simplify them even further, until you have three to five (seven at most) words you use to describe someone.
The result is a consensus message.
2/4
When you take those boiled-down terms and then put them back into memes, the folks who responded to the poll are already "invested" and will spread your memes, because you listened to them and cared what they said.
She burned her rep by publicly backstabbing a fellow Berner.
And for what?
For a frankly piddling amount of fame: she was ~50th place for 'trending' on Twitter, because she tried to attack NAFO as racists, and we accidentally called her 'Brie' (like Brie Larson & Alison Brie).
I've linked this NYT article before, but this is the spot where my company is mentioned and linked.
For the next two months after this came out, I turned down Washington Post & New York Times interview requests. nytimes.com/2019/01/07/us/…
In January of 2019, when that story came out, I could have gone public with, essentially, a lot of details on how political operations on the center-left are financed.
I mean names, companies, meetings, phone logs; basically the kind of thing that Breitbart or Fox would use.