A sad irony that peak fiat would be #FTX - a "crypto" exchange. Fiat shills at #NYT say "it is just like #JPMorgan" in showing the need for a central bank. Close miss: It is just like JPM a moral hazard of centralized money production, regulation, lobbying, and other collusion.
FTX's event "Crypto Bahamas" in April gave it all away when speaker Bill Clinton concluded that "crypto is obviously serious." I'd rather be the jester calling out the naked king than courting the "serious" people in finance and politics.
How odd that the jesters are considered "toxic". Nothing is more toxic than this typically decadent combination of shills, crooks, careerists, and journalists, virtue-signaling on how they'd solve all the world's problems.
It is above all the shared disgust and moral outrage about this crowd, be it "crypto" or even more "serious" finance, that unites "Bitcoin maximalists," even though Bitcoin is and should be a neutral tool. It is this moral aspect that also explains the perception as a "cult."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I have seen criticism of #BTC22 and other Bitcoin conferences for high ticket prices, which are deemed antithetical to the open ethos of Bitcoin. A thread with some thoughts on the issue:
That entrepreneurs (in this case, conference organizers) are attacked for high prices is a typical and pernicious effect of inflation. Don't blame the victim and spare your anger for fiat driving up costs.
Conference-related costs have some of the highest fiat inflows. Fiat conferences like WEF are lavish events for Cantillonaire consumption, mostly of prestige.
Thanks, @danheld. I agree that gambling is a significant use case. I just doubt the following implication: People want fun ways to gamble BTC, but it does not deliver, so it loses one onboarding opportunity after another to alts.
First, the main argument was that BTC sucked at micropayments. But the main cost of payments is psychological aversion. This is why casino tokens and in-game currencies paid for in bulk up-front are better models for such businesses (no blockchain needed).
My argument: Alts did not do better at gambling because of better scalability, but because they are perceived as "play money" by their holders.