Wikipedians are rebelling against "unethical" fundraising banners the Wikimedia Foundation wants to display on Wikipedia in coming weeks, calling them "guilt-tripping", "immoral", "This is not a fundraiser for Wikipedia – this is a fundraiser for the WMF" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia…
Background: The Wikimedia Foundation has increased its revenue goal for this year to $175 million, a $20 million increase (actual hosting costs are about $2.5 million) foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Resolutio…
Wikimedia salary costs have increased by $20 million year on year – $88 million in 2021-2022 vs. $68 million in 2020-2021, a 30% increase foundation.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?ti…
The Wikimedia Foundation reported a $12 million "negative investment income" in 2021-2022 (it had an $8 million surplus overall anyway, and a $50 million surplus the year prior); questions about what happened have gone unanswered to date: lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/lis…
The grant totals the Wikimedia Foundation reports to the volunteer community on its "Meta-Wiki" do not match what the WMF tells the IRS in its Form 990. Questions about this have remained unanswered to date: meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?ti…lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/lis…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This year, once again, so many people are led into thinking Wikipedia is "broke" and must be "saved". In fact, the Wikimedia Foundation is richer than ever, with hundreds of millions in assets, 8-figure annual surpluses and $350K executive salaries. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia…
You wouldn't think so from the fundraising emails currently being sent out, telling people to donate "to keep Wikipedia online", saying it's "awkward to ask", etc. A recent poll of Wikipedia volunteers condemned these emails as unethical and misleading. lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/lis…
It's all about "maximizing revenue". If people want to throw money into a bottomless pit, fine; but let's not pretend that the money is needed "to keep Wikipedia online". The numbers in the financial statements tell a different story: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia…
The Wikimedia Foundation has released mock-ups of the Jimbo emails that will be used from September to November to ask past donors for more money—ostensibly to "keep Wikipedia online", as though the Foundation didn't have assets and reserves of ~$400M. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia…
Each email address associated with a past donor will get three emails. Email no. 2 tells people they can unlock bronze, silver, gold and platinum "badges" if they continue donating each year. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia…
Nothing wrong with accepting donations of course but it would be nice if people were not left with a false impression as to what the money is used for, because keeping Wikipedia online and ad-free has little to do with it. Wikimedia is richer than ever. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia…