Your AAS registration fee is very high. It's a huge barrier to participation. We're (quite literally) not allowed to bankrupt the society, but we can start a dialog about fees.
Hosting #AAS241 will cost us at least $1,612,249. We'll lose money or *barely* break even (1/n)
The largest expense by far is our collection of (excellent! professional!) A/V vendors, to whom we'll pay $424,000. Making the meeting hybrid effectively doubles their quote, i.e. adds about $200,000 to the total meeting cost. There is almost zero price competition in this space.
There is basically no compelling argument why a conference that costs you $700 in reg fee alone shouldn't provide you stable, fast wifi throughout the meeting. And so we will pay $147,000 to provide "free" WiFi throughout all venues. We have zero negotiating power here.
If you pay $700 in registration fee, it'd feel crappy if your society didn't put out some coffee and pastries for you in the morning. We'll pay $200,000 in food & beverage at this meeting. Individual pastries can range as high as $8 a piece. A single pot of coffee is >$200.
Those cash bars at "happy hour" in the exhibit hall? Where you'll be charged like $12 for a Sam Adams? Those alone cost several thousand bucks each. 👀
Why are we paying $40,000 in credit card fees? Because nearly everyone pays their registration fee on a credit card (perfectly understandable). The AAS was able to negotiate with processors to get a lower rate due to our volume and timing of transactions, but it's still $40K.
Meeting Staff Salary & Benefits is the cost of the fully loaded FTEs for our phenomenal meetings team, without whom the meeting would be a dumpster fire of chaos and pain.
The financial burden of child & dependent care can be so great that it prevents attendance at meetings, especially for early career scientists or those at small institutions with limited funding. We therefore heavily subsidize childcare: aas.org/content/childd…
The total cost and cost-per-attendee curve (as a function of meeting size) is bonkers, with step functions all over the place. AAS meetings (until the early 2000s) used to be hosted at Universities or large-ish hotels. Now we're just large enough to require a convention center.
there *are* places we totally could save. Maybe we don't need those cash bars. Maybe ditch the coffee and pastries. But even cutting food costs by half would only lower per-attendee cost a small amount, because the cost is so dominated by meeting A/V and support.
Anyway, while we do charge a virtual attendance fee, we insist that virtual attendees not be charged for coffee & pastries and all the in-person stuff they will not be able to enjoy. So we silo their fees to pay for only the virtual platform.
#AAS241 is going to be amazing. Our Plenary & Prize Lecture roster alone will be incredible. Early registration ends *today*. Please lock in that lower fee. And please enjoy those $8 bagels. 🥴😜 aas.org/meetings/aas24…
We welcome your feedback & thoughts on registration fees to comments@aas.org. We may not be able to respond to everything in that inbox, but we do read everything and take it super seriously.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
To protect our beloved, overworked meetings team, and because we only have ~2% active participation in a virtual component that costs >$200,000, we need to make major changes to how we do Hybrid. (1/n)
In consultation with our friends on @AAS_WGAD and our Future of Meetings Task Force, we're asking for your thoughts on how we can more effectively incorporate virtual participants in our future meetings. We have many more details in this blog post:
@AAS_WGAD Here's the data for our past three hybrid meetings. The *majority* of Zoom rooms for the past three meetings have sat nearly or totally empty. Virtual presenters have unknowingly given talks to empty rooms. Glitches are frequent, even though we have a vendor-supported platform.
We will build and fly a new constellation of Great Observatories, beginning with the Habitable Worlds Observatory. It will pursue life beyond earth, and with the power of a fleet including X-ray and FIR Great Observatories, we will tell the story of life in the Universe.
We can’t do this without a grassroots community coalition to advocate for the fleet at all fractal levels, from chats with a student to advocacy amongst stakeholders and policy makers. Join us here greatobservatories.org
Want to get involved now? We need you! Join NASA’s New Great Observatories Science Analysis Group by Jan 15. greatobservatories.org/sag
.@chandraxray's *real* First Light vs. the "public" First Light. The former is so much more epochal and emotional. But it's hard to explain to the public why it looks cruddy. JWST going through this right now, but the People Who've Seen It are absolutely overjoyed.
@chandraxray I've only ever seen two true First Lights: MUSE and SPHERE on @ESO's Very Large Telescope. There were lots of tears and hugs. A technical achievement that becomes a human moment *real* fast. I can't imagine what it must've been like to be in the MOC earlier this week.
The absolute first Chandra image. Leon X-1 (the source in my first tweet) is circle #5. Now you get why the big splashy media release First Lights are of more immediately spectacular things. But this is the real moment.
Fun note from Eric Smith just now: The SAME driver who drove all of the JWST mirrors across the country drove the truck with fully assembled JWST onto the boat. Been with project a long time!
Salute to you, Driver. A critical part of the JWST team.
I mean, arguably one of the most critical. 🤷♂️
I mean, I'm kinda tearing up just thinking about it. Same driver got to send it on its last earthbound journey. 😢