I used to source all of mine from academic literature & conferences, or from my own research.
But these can become echo chambers that limit thinking & creativity.
🔥 Here are 4 overlooked places to find impactful research problems:
1️⃣ Your own life
• This is why I started studying low back #biomechanics
• I was a parent to young kids & experiencing back pain
• I was curious if we could create more practical exoskeletons that'd fit into my own life
It started as an undergrad project then grew into more:
2️⃣ Spending time w/ users
• In academia we often talk about this
• But we tend to involve users too late in R&D
• And I'm not convinced we spend enough time doing it
Hearing pain points directly from #prosthetics users is what prompted the daily activities we now study:
3️⃣ Spending time w/ clinicians
• They see & know so much that we don't
• They have important applied research problems
• But you must spend enough time w/ them to understand the problems & constraints
Much of our wearables & running research came from convos w/ clinicians:
4️⃣ Industry-facing conferences
• This is honestly like a cheat code
• You get to learn about real contemporary problems
• Sometimes you discover emerging topics years before they're in the scientific literature
This is how we started studying thermal comfort of exoskeletons:
TL/DR
The scientific literature is great. But it isn't the only place to source research problems.
Explore these overlooked sources for inspiration:
1. Examining your own life 2. Spending time with users 3. Spending time with clinicians 4. Attending industry conferences
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Science is the foundation, but user feedback is the north star:
• to know what to prioritize
• to learn where to improve
• to remember why you sweat all the science details
This is a vital lesson for those doing applied research whose feedback is mostly from other scientists
The combination of #biomechanics science and user-centric design is beginning to have the real-world impact the occupational #exoskeleton field long hypothesized it would.
End-users explain this best:
“When you show you care about people, that retains people,” one warehouse worker who piloted a back exosuit said. “Everybody in here, we’re all sore. We’re all hurting. But for the first time in a long time I won’t be hurting walking out of this building [because of the exosuit]”
Early career researchers often stress out when they talk to more senior faculty about how many grant proposals they submit.
Don't compare. Focus on your writing process. Outcomes will follow.
Here are 5 proven tricks senior faculty use to submit more high-quality proposals:🧵
1. Resubmitting
• Revise/resubmit an unfunded proposal
• This takes much less time than writing a new application
This is easier to do (and comes naturally) as you get further into your career.
2. Repurposing
• Take a similar core idea and apply it to a new population or context
• Or you can sometimes submit the same proposal to multiple agencies (check w/ program officers first; you just can't accept two grants for the same work)
👉🏽 If you do R&D on wearable or assistive tech, wear/use prototypes regularly in your daily life. It helps empathize with end users. And improves your ability to design and test for usability & practicality.
Here's why (brief 🧵)
1. It builds your intuition.
In retrospect, this tip seems obvious. But most researchers & developers don't do it. It took me >10 years of biomedical R&D to realize it.
You'll notice design constraints you never knew existed. You'll think more deeply about user experience. And you'll create better lab and field evaluations more quickly.
It helps preempt fatal flaws before you start any serious design or testing work.