Aleks 🙂 Profile picture
Nov 16 7 tweets 3 min read
Somebody dropped missiles into Poland. #Article5 allows a NATO response. The media is reporting Russian missiles responsible and evidence from the ground seems to support this. A thread looking at what information is available so far...
Several pictures and video have emerged of the impact site near the Polish border
Suggesting from the debris that the missile was an S-300 5V55 series ground to air missile. If correct, this is a Russian missile, deagel.com/Defensive%20We… suggests a range of 90km.
However as we in Britain accompanied by the Americans take no responsibility for how the weapons we manufacture are used, a missile that could be 30 years old made by Russia doesn't mean launched by Russia. The prior Deagel link suggests they don't actually use it anymore.
So who is in range of Przewodów where the missile struck? Within 90km, only Ukraine. Within 120km just about the tip of Belarus. Russian forces are more than 600km from Poland. If an S-300 it came from Ukraine, Poland or implausibly Belarus.
The only thing we can be certain of at this stage is that if it was an S-300 missile - it was made by Russia, but Russia didn't launch it. NATO know without doubt who launched it, that's why "Russian missile" but not Russia is responsible. Article 5 against who then?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aleks 🙂

Aleks 🙂 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @an648

Apr 30
Why does this keep appearing in "What's happening"? twitter.com/i/events/13665… This hardly "LIVE", all the posts are months old. This presentation of facts isn't even really supported by the source of the facts. Let's take a look deeper... 1/5
What is the basis of the WHO statement that people should wear well fitted masks? We should take a look at the WHO technical guidance for further details: who.int/publications/i…. Noteworthy that the section titled "Scientific Evidence" (p3) makes not one mention of masks. 2/5
Page 8 however does present some evidence. Evidence that clearly states that there is no evidence that masks provide any benefit in a community setting. Odd isn't it then that they are recommending this on the back of no evidence? 3/5
Read 5 tweets
Feb 26
A 🧵in which I may be wide of the mark: The reason Ukraine has so much focus vs the others in this meme is simply because it is not ordained by the controlling agenda. Certainly it has been forced by the controlling agenda but Russian control of UA is not part of their plan. 1/12
Let us not forget that Viktor Yanukovych was ousted in a violent military coup sponsored by the west when he spurned the EU to become closer to Russia again. 2/12
The rhetoric decrying the invasion of a sovereign democracy is slightly hollow when (and call me cynical) UA is yet another victim of western sponsored regime change. It serves to measure that Zelenskyy is also "our man".3/12
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(