That the ark of Noach indeed can be seen as the written Torah as a whole might be confirmed in Genesis 8:14 that has same numerical value as Genesis 1:1, viz. 2701
Weinreb (in "De Bijbel als Schepping") saw the ark as a pyramide with invisible top, which makes much think of Jenkin's visualisation of Genesis 1:1 supported by the first word of Genesis 1:2, as shown above
The first word of Genesis 1:2 takes up the last word of Genesis 1:1
"hey" the middle letter of "tzohar", the roofwindow of the ark that touched the 50th cubit and from where Noach sent forth the raven ad the dove; the dove that returned with the plucked off olive leaf in its mouth
twentyseventh
Baal Shem Tov: תבה מרומז על מלה
"teivah" actually means "millah" 'word', and the meaning of making an opening for the ark is that you should be careful to illuminate the word "hateivah" that comes from your mouthsefaria.org/Baal_Shem_Tov%…
"nes" miracle, gematria 110 = 73 + 37; the "magen david" numbers that destined the 2701 (= 73 x 37) numerical value of Genesis 1:1
The righteous women in that generation were confident that God would perform miracles ,"nissim",
for them and they accordingly had brought timbrels with them from Egypt
Would that be how Mary became pregnant?
Luke 1:30
And the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God = εὗρες γὰρ χάριν παρὰ τῷ θεῷ
John 1:15,
Ἰωάννης μαρτυρεῖ περὶ αὐτοῦ (= the word that became flesh)
καὶ κέκραγεν λέγων, Οὗτος ἦν ὃν εἶπον, Ὁ ὀπίσω μου ἐρχόμενος ἔμπροσθέν μου γέγονεν, ὅτι πρῶτός μου ἦν
Οὗτος ἦν also in John 1:2,
οὗτος ἦν ἐν ἀρχῇ πρὸς τὸν θεόν
cf. Rashi on Genesis 1:1
in the beginning it was his intention to create it with the standard of justice, but he perceived that the world would not endure; so he preceded it with the standard of mercy, allying it with the standard of justice
Although man only was created on the sixth day, as resurrected one he was already present on the first, because of which the first day was called "yom echad" = day one
Rashi:
Why does it write אחד “one”? Because the holy one, blessed be he, was only one (יָחִיד "yachid") in his world, since the angels were not created until the second day.
"Im hebräischen Urtext stünden nicht die Substantive "Mann" und "Frau" ("isch" und "ischah"), sondern die Adjektive "männlich" und "weiblich" ("zakar" und "neqebah"), so Schwienhorst-Schönberger. Das ändere jedoch nichts am Gesamtverständnis (...)"katholisch.de/artikel/47430-…
Jedoch er hat nicht gut gelesen
Genesis 2:23,
"wajomer haadam" und der Mensch (der männlich und weiblich Geschaffene) sagte: "(...) und diese wird Frau, "ischah" genannt werden, denn diese ist vom Mann ("mei-isch") genommen
Genesis 3:6,
"wateirè haischah" - und die Frau (die weibliche Seite des Menschen) sah dass de Baum gut sei zum Essen, us.w. sefaria.org/Genesis.3.6?la…
The numerical value of Genesis 1:1, i.e. the sum of the values of the 28 lettters with which it is written, is 2701, a remarkable number since 2701 = triangle 73
Just that he went into the mist with comparing Hebrew gematria with Greek to claim that it is about Jesus Christ:
Word 7 (translated ‘earth’) has the value 296 (= 8x37) – and, most appropriately, we find this to be a factor of both Name and Title of the Lord Jesus Christ
But there is some other thing about it, viz. that in the first verse of Genesis there is mentioning of "elohim" and not of "hashem"