Inflation is simple to explain @RevRichardColes. It’s a measure of the increase in prices in a month compared to the previous year. It is high now as the impact of Putin’s war works through the economy. That war has lasted less than a year so far. A quick thread…..
What this means is that right now we are comparing prices after Putin’s war began with those before it began. And since the war has pushed up energy and food prices, especially, the inflation rate is high right now.
IWhen Putin’s war has lasted more than a year we will compare prices after the war began with earlier high prices from months also after the war began. That means the rate of inflation is mathematically bound to fall unless we get another massive shock like that again.
I stress, that dies not mean prices will fall. They won’t necessarily until energy costs decline, if they ever do. But inflation will fall. Interest rate increases will have nothing to do with it. They can’t tackle this type of inflation and take two years to work anyway.
The real social problems from inflation are a) the immediate poverty inducing price rises if people do not have wage increases to match and b) the continuing poverty if they do not get wage increases to match new price levels in the long term.
Then there is also the problem of inequality this type of inflation causes. Historically, wage driven inflation reduced inequality. But we have energy price driven inflation now and this increases inequality. If wages don’t rise now profits will. The rich win. Wage earners lose.
What that means is government desperation to keep wages down disguises a desire to create a more unequal society. This will be the long term impact of this inflation when the inflation we’re now suffering will be gone, which it will be in a year or so. I hope that helps. ENDS

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Richard Murphy

Richard Murphy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RichardJMurphy

Nov 17
Holding tax and national insurance allowances as they are is going to increase tax by over £400 for the average household next year. Add in £600 or more extra on fuel bills and everyone paying tax might be £1,000 worse off before we hear anything else from Hunt today.
Then there are the mortgage and rent rises that for many will be much bigger than these sums and could come to many thousands a year because of unnecessary interest rate rises, which Hunt is permitting. The outlook for 2023 that Hunt will be delivering is grim, by his choice.
On top of that, the Bank of England thinks recession will push up unemployment by at least a million people, and I suspect it could be more. Many small businesses (and larger ones too) might fail, alongside lots of public services because they will not be able to pay their bills.
Read 6 tweets
Nov 14
The UK’s national debt is a strange figure. For example, to most people's surprise it includes all our notes and coins, as well as premium bonds. But much more worrying is the fact that a significant part of it is created by what I think to be dubious accounting. A thread…
[This is a long thread. If it appears to stop mid-flow click the last tweet you can see and the rest should appear or click ‘see more replies’]
The way the national debt is calculated makes a massive difference when it comes to calculating so-called ‘fiscal black holes’, which are the supposed reason why we need to have austerity and tax rises now. But some of the accounting for this debt is dubious, to say the least.
Read 35 tweets
Nov 13
Jeremy Hunt is saying we cannot max out the national credit card this morning. This is total nonsense. There is no national credit card. Instead it’s the job of government to make the money we use. And since it can always make that money it can never max out on credit.
Hunt wants you to believe that we max out the national credit card. But no gov’t can do that because it’s an organisation unlike any other, with it’s own bank, which means it has no credit limits. Instead, the question is should it be creating more money for the common good now?
The answer to that is that of course the government should be creating more money right now. When households have less to spend, and when business investment is falling so banks aren’t lending and exports are knackered by Brexit, only gov’t spending can get us out of recession.
Read 8 tweets
Nov 9
This thread is a reply to @westreeting. He responded with a series of tweets to comments I made yesterday. I am responding with a thread. If it appears to stop midstream click the last one you can see and the rest will appear…….
First, it’s a shame you started by calling me hysterical when very clearly the questions you responded to show that I am not. I attach the definition of being hysterical. I clearly am not what you described me as. Might you drop the hyperbole?
Second, it’s a shame your tweets are really hard to follow as they do not form a thread, which you could only have delivered by quote tweeting rather than replying to me. It’s a trick worth learning.
Read 22 tweets
Nov 6
I was interviewed by Matt Frei on LBC yesterday. The subject of discussion was Brexit. At the close of the interview Matt asked me in ten seconds to summarise something good that had happened as a result of Brexit. I used two seconds and said, “I can’t”.
I had a rather strong impression that Matt Frei shared my opinion. I think he also agreed that one of the most worrying things about Brexit is the democratic deficit it has created in England (but not in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland).
With both LibDems and Labour chasing votes in Leave areas (the southwest and north, respectively) they are unwilling to talk about the massive failings of Brexit, and give no hint of reversing it. That leaves well over 50% of the population effectively unrepresented.
Read 10 tweets
Nov 5
The future of Twitter appears to be in doubt today. Advertisers have pulled out. Musk has slashed staff numbers. A nasty, right-wing dominated hate-fest may follow, although I hope not. But what if other critical media institutions went the same way? What then? A quick thread…
I have a passion for Twitter. I note I have sent more than 90,000 tweets since 2008. That’s 18 a day, on average. This place has mattered to me. That Elon Musk might destroy it is a matter of considerable concern to me as a result.
I don’t see how many good voices that have been heard as a result of Twitter would have got noticed without it. I would deeply miss the almost instant news on politics that it provides because most opinion I want to hear is on this site.
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(