The Cultural Tutor Profile picture
Nov 17, 2022 25 tweets 11 min read Read on X
This 1928 self-portrait is probably the ultimate Art Deco painting.

And it's by Tamara de Lempicka, the ultimate Art Deco artist.

She was a unique, futuristic painter with a wild life whose work captured the spirit of the 1920s...
Tamara Gurwik-Górska was born in Poland in 1898 and raised in Warsaw by her father - a lawyer - and her mother - a socialite.

Her rebellious, artistic nature was clear from the start; at the age of ten, dissatisified with the work of a family portraitist, she redid it herself.
After dropping out of her Swiss boarding school she travelled to St Petersburg and married a lawyer, Tadeusz Łempicki.

But everything changed with the Russian Revolution of 1917. She got Tadeusz (arrested by the secret police) out of prison and the family fled to Paris.
Lempicka was just twenty, the mother of a young child, and her husband was jobless. But she wanted to paint - and so she studied at the Académie de la Grande Chaumière.

There she came under the influence of progressive artists like Maurice Denis and Andre Lhote. Polyphemus by Maurice Denis (1907)The Stopover by Andre Lohte (1913)
Lempicka flourished in the cultural circles of 1920s Paris, and engaged in numerous scandalous affairs with both men and women.

It was an artistic whirlpool of the avant-garde, Cubism, and Futurism, all framed by disillusionment in the shadow of the First World War.
Lempicka's early work, influenced primarily by Lhote, was exhibited in several of Paris' art salons.

From the Kiss (left, 1922) to the Green Veil (right, 1924) we can see her style maturing; from loose brushwork to smooth forms and from darker tones to vivid, metallic colours. The Kiss by Tamara de Lempicka (1922)The Green Veil by Tamara de Lempicka (1924)
Suitably, it was at the 1925 "Exposition internationale des arts décoratifs" in Paris - which gave Art Deco its name - that Lempicka first found serious success and gained a reputation.

She forged her own, distinctive style - one which captured the prevailing spirit of the 20s. The Pink Dress by Tamara de Lempicka (1927)
The striking thing about Lempicka's personal brand of Cubism was its classical influence.

Many Post-Impressionist, Cubist, and proto-modernist artists had done away with linear perspective; their paintings increasingly lacked depth and utilised flat planes of colour. Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2 by Marcel Duchamp (1912)
Not Lempicka.

Although she employed the quasi-abstract shapes of the Cubists and the unnaturally vivid colours of the Expressionists, she used them to create real depth and weight.

It's Cubism come to life, as if Lempicka had reassembled a work by Picasso. Girl in Green Dress by Tamara de Lempicka (1931)
Indeed, one of Lempicka's favourite painters was the 19th century French neoclassical artist Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres, who like Lempicka favoured a smooth, absolute clarity of form.

Like Ingres, her work features striking, clean compositions - with hints of Caravaggio, too. Beautiful Rafaela by Tamara de Lempicka (1927)La Grande Baigneuse by J.A.D. Ingres (1808)
Indeed, it was in her portraits that Lempicka's fusion of the modern and the traditional - like Art Deco itself - is revealed.

They are, collectively, a remarkable artistic achievement, one which conveys the cultural ideals of an era in an immediately recognisable style. Mrs Bush (1929)Dr Boucard (1928)
Lempicka's portraits are also startlingly futuristic, mixing Art Deco's lavish design with the technological fears of the age.

Her humans and their clothes have a smooth, metallic texture; they remind us of robots, captivating but lifeless.

(With some Botticelli curls, too) L'éclat by Tamara de Lempicka (1931)
Lempicka also painted female nudes throughout her career, drawing together her many influences to paint them in ways that had never quite been seen before, mixing traditional realism with the avant-garde and - somehow - finding a balance between the two. Nude on a Terrace (1925)
While the cityscapes that haunt the backgrounds of all Lempicka's portraits are reminiscent of Fritz Lang's 1927 Art Deco-science fiction masterpiece, Metropolis, with those soaring skyscrapers almost terrifying in their distant monumentality; the looming future. Portrait of Madame Allan Bott (1930)
Few paintings quite capture the spirit of the age like Lempicka's portrait of Marjorie Ferry.

The glamour and decadence we associate with the 1920s, the hyper-stylised art and the mixture of disillusionment with optimism, extravagance with looming catastrophe... it's all there. Portrait of Marjorie Ferry (1932)
The famous "Autoportrait", commissioned by the German magazine Die Dame in 1928, was but one of many paintings by Lempicka featured in print.

By 1930 she had become an internationally famous artist with exhibitions all around Europe and America.
But Lempicka's fame was, like Art Deco itself, short-lived.

By 1934 she had married Baron Raoul Kuffner (after his wife died she had divorced Tadeusz) and all seemed well. But the Great Depression and the rise of political tension in Europe had fundamentally changed art. Tamara de Lempicka and Baron Kuffner in Venice
And as the 1930s went on Lempicka seemed to experience something of a spiritual crisis, perhaps disillusionment, as her fame started to wane and the cultural winds shifted.

Religious themes dominate her work in this period, as in The Madonna With A Tear from 1935:
Gone was the latent luxury of Art Deco, the decadence and the glamour of the Roaring Twenties.

Lempicka had turned her hand to much more sober subject matters. And yet, more than ever before, her art has real emotional expressiveness. Peasant Girl with Pitcher (1937)John the Baptist (1935)Mother Superior (1935)
In 1939, after the outbreak of the Second World War, Lempicka and her husband moved to America. She had been there before and was well-known; a career surely awaited...

Her most striking painting from this time is Escape (1939), which needs no explanation.
Things did not go as planned. Lempicka's style had become old-fashioned. With exhibitions unsuccessful and portrait commisions declining, she struggled to find direction.

And so Lempicka painted still lifes for the first time, still retaining much of her distinctive style: Still Life with Lemons and Apples (1946)
In the 1950s and 60s, perhaps inspired by the "abstract expressionism" of postwar New York, embodied in the work of painters like Jackson Pollock, Lempicka dived headlong into abstract art.

She had cast off her beloved style in an effort to keep up with the times.
But by the late 1960s it was clear her career had stalled, with the luxurious futurism of Art Deco long-buried by more austere modernism. She couldn't find a place in this new artistic world.

Lempicka turned back to religious work; her last painting, in 1974, was of St Anthony:
In 1972 a Paris exhibition saw the "rediscovery" of Art Deco and a renewed interest in Lempicka's work.

But she had retired by then. And in 1974 she moved to Mexico, where she died six years later, her ashes scattered over Popocatépetl.

The end of a long, wild, colourful life.
And here is Tamara de Lempicka herself, alongside one of her instantly recognisable portraits.

Few painters have ever quite captured the *feeling* of their age like Lempicka, whose art seems to embody the Art Deco.

And yet, in all their brilliance, they remain truly timeless.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Cultural Tutor

The Cultural Tutor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @culturaltutor

Aug 31, 2025
We spend more than 90% of our time inside, so why do we design so many of our interiors like this?

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting.

It's generic, boring, and genuinely bad for our physical and psychological health... Image
Not all interiors look like this, but too many do, and more all the time.

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting, neutral colours for details, everything plastic, shiny, and rectangular.

This has become the standard for new buildings (and refurbishments) around the world. Image
A common response is that some people like it, or at least don't mind it.

Maybe, but that's the problem.

The sum of all tastes is no taste at all, and if our aim is simply to make things that people "don't mind" then we end up with blandness. Image
Read 22 tweets
Aug 21, 2025
The world's most famous neoclassical buildings are kind of boring and generic when you actually look at them.

It's even hard to tell them apart: which one below is Versailles, or Buckingham Palace?

So here's why neoclassical architecture (although it's nice) is overrated: Image
Buckingham Palace, despite being one of the world's most famous and visited buildings, is essentially quite boring and uninspiring from the outside.

There's a certain stateliness to it, but (like most big neoclassical buildings) it's really just a box wrapped in pilasters. Image
The same is true of Versailles.

Again, it's evidently pretty (largely thanks to the colour of its stone) but there's something weirdly plain about it, almost standardised.

Plus the emphasis on its horizontal lines makes it feel very low-lying, undramatic, and flat. Image
Read 26 tweets
Aug 17, 2025
These aren't castles, palaces, or cathedrals.

They're all water towers, literally just bits of infrastructure relating to water management.

Is it worth the additional cost and resources to make things look like this... or is it a waste? Image
These old water towers are an architectural subgenre of their own.

There are hundreds, mostly Neo-Gothic, and all add something wonderful to the skylines of their cities.

Like the one below in Bydgoszcz, Poland, from 1900.

But, most importantly, they're just infrastructure. Image
We don't think of infrastructure as something that can improve how a town looks and feels.

Infrastructure is necessary to make life convenient; but also, we believe, definitionally boring.

These water towers prove that doesn't have to, and shouldn't be, the case. Image
Read 24 tweets
Aug 8, 2025
If one thing sums up the 21st century it's got to be all these default profile pictures.

You've seen them literally thousands of times, but they're completely generic and interchangeable.

Future historians will use them to symbolise our current era, and here's why... Image
To understand what any society truly believed, and how they felt about humankind, you need to look at what they created rather than what they said.

Just as actions instead of words reveal who a person really is, art always tells you what a society was actually like.
And this is particularly true of how they depicted human beings — how we portray ourselves.

That the Pharaohs were of supreme power, and were worshipped as gods far above ordinary people, is made obvious by the sheer size and abundance of the statues made in their name: Image
Read 23 tweets
Aug 6, 2025
This is St. Anne's Church in Vilnius, Lithuania.

It's over 500 years old and the perfect example of a strange architectural style known as "Brick Gothic".

But, more importantly, it's a lesson in how imagination can transform the way our world looks... Image
Vilnius has one of the world's best-preserved Medieval old towns.

It's a UNESCO World Heritage Site, filled with winding streets and architectural gems from across the ages.

A testament to the wealth, grandeur, and sophistication of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Image
Among its many treasures is the Church of St Anne, built from 1495 to 1500 under the Duke of Lithuania and (later) King of Poland, Alexander I Jagiellon.

It's not particularly big — a single nave without aisles — but St Anne's makes up for size with its fantastical brickwork. Image
Read 18 tweets
Jul 31, 2025
Tell your friends! Your enemies! Your lovers!

The Spanish edition of my new book, El Tutor Cultural, is now available for pre-order.

It'll be released on 22 October — and you can get it at the link in my bio.

To celebrate, here are the 10 best things I've written about Spain: from why Barcelona looks the way it does to one of the world's most underrated modern architects, from the truth about Pablo Picasso to the origins of the Spanish football badge...Image
What makes Barcelona such a beautiful city? It wasn't an accident — this is the story of how the modern, beloved Barcelona was consciously created:

Image
And, speaking of Barcelona, here's why the renovation of the Camp Nou is — although necessary — a shame:

Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(