JB Schneider Profile picture
Nov 18, 2022 β€’ 13 tweets β€’ 7 min read β€’ Read on X
After seeing the video posted by @UAWeapons of a πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί Lancet hitting a 5N63S radar, I figured that this deserved some more attention.

Hard to answer the decoy question on the spot, but this is definitely a πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί 5N63S radar struck by a πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί Lancet loitering drone.

A short 🧡

1/
The location of the system is @GeoConfirmed at 47.02903, 33.2402, which is in the Kherson Oblast.

The video came online on Nov 16th, if we assume that the attack was recent and consider the nice weather during the attack, 14/15 Nov seems the most probable days.

2/ Image
Below is the map with the location (47.02903, 33.2402) and the frontline from just before the πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί occupiers left the Kherson area.

3/ Image
Around that time, the whole Kherson area was already abandoned by πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί, allowing for πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ to reclaim their lands.

So when was this radar system present?

The picture below is from 03 Nov 22, SIX days before πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί left. Clearly this was πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί radar! Note both TEL's marked in red.

4/ Image
But even if we go way back in time to as early as 02 Sep 22, this system is already present πŸ€”

Let's be honest, a S-300 radar with 2 launchers that doesn't move for 2 months. Very very odd indeed.

All 3 systems could have been struck by πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦, but there are no signs of that.

5/ Image
What else is there to learn from the attack video?

Well it misses both generators and the tall antenna behind the driver compartment. That could have been recovered after it was struck, but it is almost impossible to prove.

6/ ImageImage
What else?

On the radar piece, there is no door visible on the side, however as depicted in the red square, a door is present were it is not to be expected.

7/ ImageImage
To sum it all up:
- 5N63S radar and both TEL's are πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί
- all systems were already present in Sep 22, well before πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ took the area back
- no visible damage on Sat imagery
- 5N63S radar lacks some parts and looks somewhat different, that could indicate it is a decoy.

/8
But great job πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί, decoy or not, you still hit one of your own πŸ₯³

If I knew better I would say one of the raccoons you stole was flying🦝

/9 Image
Great new picture below from the πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί 5N63S radar.

I can't see any damage to it, so likely this picture was taken before the Lancet bumped into it.

By the looks it's not a decoy, but rather a damaged one used in a decoy context.

Thanks πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ @mil_in_ua πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦for sharing this!

/10 Image
Oh boy, it becomes even more interesting, seems like @MattBartholome9 found some proof of damage. Looks as the Lancet had some sort of ricochet on the edge. Well spotted!

/11 Image
And some bonus material from the spot. Both launchers are still there too.

/12

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with JB Schneider

JB Schneider Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JohnB_Schneider

Nov 2, 2022
Since the whole internet was wondering where the Admiral Makarov was, a short 🧡

In short: Both ADM Makarov and Essen are in the picture. Date of picture: between 29/10 afternoon and 30/10 evening.

There is some room for error, only what is visible was investigated.

1/
The time was derived from different imagery sources. This area has a lot of movement near the landing area and ships shuffle locations and positions regularly.

Extra inspiration came from imagery found at @COUPSURE and @romanov_92

2/
Proof for ship no 1: Admiral Grigorovich class.

Yes, no damage can be seen, since the attack happened starboard (and we only see port). Additionally the explosive charge the USV was carrying could not have been much heavier than 50kg, which is not that much.

3/
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(