1/ A year ago, I heard: "I don't want alternatives in my portfolio."
Today, it's: "I wish you offered 100% alternative portfolios."
A few thoughts on THE PENDULUM and FRICTION.
2/ One of the constants in my career is that the pendulum always seems to swing too far.
Maybe it's human nature.
3/ In finance, I believe it's a mix between information asymmetry and a variation of Gresham's Law.
The advisors I work with compete with other advisors. If opaque alternatives are underperforming, you had better believe there is an advisor down the street selling "simple."
4/ And, when alternatives are outperforming, you had better believe there is an advisor down the street crowing about their unique process of incorporating unique diversifiers.
5/ And so the crowd is largely left chasing because the end investor is, unfortunately, simply not educated well enough on these topics to understand what's actually happening: performance chasing.
6/ Catering to these whims, as an asset manager, can be enticing.
After all, if everyone is clamoring for an all-alternative model today, why shouldn't I give it to them?
Someone else probably will, after all. And don't I think I can build the best one?
7/ But hot money is hot money.
I'm going to have to spend the time to build the model, go through the due diligence process of getting it approved on platforms, and sell it to advisors.
And they're gonna blow out of it as soon as alternatives underperform again.
8/ As frustrating as FRICTION can be in any process, I think it serves a fundamental benefit in preventing any PENDULUM from swinging too far too fast.
FRICTION forces changes to be incremental and over time rather than large and all at once.
9/ Guess what else friction helps with?
Rebalance timing luck.
(You knew I couldn't do a thread without mentioning it.)
Slow, incremental changes are basically what pushes rebalance timing luck towards zero.
10/ So, unless you believe you have an edge in making a big decision right now, friction may be your friend.
I believe this is true in both portfolio construction as well as business.
11/ Anyway, that's enough nonsense. Go back to watching college football or whatever it is people do on their Saturdays.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When @RodGordilloP and I were looking for capital efficient funds for our Return Stacking paper, I distinctly remember saying, “the difference between 50% managed futures exposure and 100% managed futures exposure is just half the volatility."
@RodGordilloP In other words, if I have 50% exposure to a 20% vol managed futures strategy, it’s the same as having 100% exposure to a 10% vol strategy.
This allowed us to say $BLNDX was 50% equity and 100% managed futures.
1/ Is Return Stacking just Portable Alpha rebranded?
Yes. But also no. A few key differences.
2/ First, what is Portable Alpha?
Returns are split between alpha and beta. Beta components are replicated using capital efficient derivatives so that cash can be allocated to alpha managers.
3/ This concept goes back decades (PIMCO, arguably, invented it in the 1980s with their StocksPLUS programs), but got very popular in the early 2000s.