1/ A year ago, I heard: "I don't want alternatives in my portfolio."

Today, it's: "I wish you offered 100% alternative portfolios."

A few thoughts on THE PENDULUM and FRICTION.
2/ One of the constants in my career is that the pendulum always seems to swing too far.

Maybe it's human nature.
3/ In finance, I believe it's a mix between information asymmetry and a variation of Gresham's Law.

The advisors I work with compete with other advisors. If opaque alternatives are underperforming, you had better believe there is an advisor down the street selling "simple."
4/ And, when alternatives are outperforming, you had better believe there is an advisor down the street crowing about their unique process of incorporating unique diversifiers.
5/ And so the crowd is largely left chasing because the end investor is, unfortunately, simply not educated well enough on these topics to understand what's actually happening: performance chasing.
6/ Catering to these whims, as an asset manager, can be enticing.

After all, if everyone is clamoring for an all-alternative model today, why shouldn't I give it to them?

Someone else probably will, after all. And don't I think I can build the best one?
7/ But hot money is hot money.

I'm going to have to spend the time to build the model, go through the due diligence process of getting it approved on platforms, and sell it to advisors.

And they're gonna blow out of it as soon as alternatives underperform again.
8/ As frustrating as FRICTION can be in any process, I think it serves a fundamental benefit in preventing any PENDULUM from swinging too far too fast.

FRICTION forces changes to be incremental and over time rather than large and all at once.
9/ Guess what else friction helps with?

Rebalance timing luck.

(You knew I couldn't do a thread without mentioning it.)

Slow, incremental changes are basically what pushes rebalance timing luck towards zero.
10/ So, unless you believe you have an edge in making a big decision right now, friction may be your friend.

I believe this is true in both portfolio construction as well as business.
11/ Anyway, that's enough nonsense. Go back to watching college football or whatever it is people do on their Saturdays.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Corey Hoffstein 🏴‍☠️

Corey Hoffstein 🏴‍☠️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @choffstein

Nov 19
I like this table from Man, but worth acknowledging how much of the historical average hedge in beta-neutral Profitability is from the tech wreck. Image
75% Systematic / 25% Tail Hedge is basically:

- 25% Tail Hedge
- 25% QMJ (Beta Neutral)
- 25% Trend Following
- 25% Dynamic Overlay program Image
Read 5 tweets
Nov 3
nobody could’ve seen this coming.

nobody.
commentary:

these are a bunch of systematic multi-asset trend strategies.

one of them was more recently created than the rest (i.e. “backtested”).

hint: it’s the purple one.
but trend following is basically systematic beta at this point.

so you really have two choices:

1. the purple line discovered some serious alpha compared to peers

2. it’s overfit
Read 4 tweets
Oct 20
I remember when Eric Crittenden first pitched the $BLNDX idea to me.

I thought it was pretty genius.

Combining 50% Equity with 50% Managed Futures helped eliminate the line item risk that plagued managed futures for so long.

podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/eri…
When @RodGordilloP and I were looking for capital efficient funds for our Return Stacking paper, I distinctly remember saying, “the difference between 50% managed futures exposure and 100% managed futures exposure is just half the volatility."
@RodGordilloP In other words, if I have 50% exposure to a 20% vol managed futures strategy, it’s the same as having 100% exposure to a 10% vol strategy.

This allowed us to say $BLNDX was 50% equity and 100% managed futures.

Capital efficient!
Read 5 tweets
Oct 14
Great thread by Benn on launching a private fund.

Almost all of this holds for launching a mutual fund or ETF, with a few wrinkles...
First, launching a fairly vanilla mutual fund or ETF is pretty “easy” at this point.

If you’re fine being on a shared trust structure, there are a number of firms that are basically “fund-in-a-box” companies.
These firms basically provide all the back-office services you need, from fund administration to accounting to transfer agency to accounting.
Read 28 tweets
Sep 29
1/ Is Return Stacking just Portable Alpha rebranded?

Yes. But also no. A few key differences.
2/ First, what is Portable Alpha?

Returns are split between alpha and beta. Beta components are replicated using capital efficient derivatives so that cash can be allocated to alpha managers. Image
3/ This concept goes back decades (PIMCO, arguably, invented it in the 1980s with their StocksPLUS programs), but got very popular in the early 2000s. ImageImage
Read 14 tweets
Sep 22
tell me you didn’t understand the product without telling me you didn’t understand the product ImageImageImage
$NTSX is now down -25% on the year and ranks as a ★★ fund on Morningstar.

$VBINX is down -17.5% on the year and is a ★★★★ fund.

66.6% x -25% = -16.6%

okay 👌
For those not familiar with $NTSX, it’s a 1.5x levered 60/40 portfolio.

So, like, of course it’s down ~1.5x what a 60/40 is.

But the whole point is that you can use it to free up capital in your portfolio for diversifiers!

portfoliovisualizer.com/backtest-portf… ImageImage
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(