Conor Browne Profile picture
Nov 20, 2022 11 tweets 3 min read Read on X
10 things I have learned about society in the UK and Ireland since the pandemic began: 🧵
1. Ableism is baked into society. My father, who developed a seizure disorder late in life, understood this all too well. I only really understand it now.
2. Most people have shockingly low levels of both resilience and adaptability. This I always knew.
3. Progressive academics are, in general, hypocrites. I have less of a problem with right-wing people not masking because at least they're being honest. If you're making a career out of pretending to care, but you're not wearing a mask at conferences, you're a hypocrite.
4. Also, people who profess to loathe the government and express extreme distrust in anything politicians say are very quick to set that sentiment aside when it suits them. Which tells you a lot about people's core values.
5. Society is extraordinarily resistant to change. I absolutely understand people wanting to eat and drink in restaurants and bars - that's totally natural - but when people are resistant to something as banal as HEPA filtration, that tells you something.
6. People lie all the time. I've lost count of the number of times people have told me they mask indoors but then the pictures pop up on social media...
7. People are very vulnerable to peer pressure. Men I know who try really hard to project an image of being a tough, hard guy have let slip to me that, 'they don't like people looking at them' - because they're wearing a mask.
8. Scientific experts are far from neutral. Science itself is not a neutral, objective pursuit. An aside: the single most important part of my education in terms of understanding this idea was taking a Philosophy of Science module in 1992. Kuhn and Feyerabend. Thanks @UlsterUni
9. Similar to (3), most peoples' declared compassion for others in society is fundamentally performative. It wasn't that long ago when people stood outside and clapped for carers. Thomas Hobbes was absolutely spot on.
10. Magical thinking is everywhere, from governments to individuals. Even the most rational of people are vulnerable to it. Hope is not a strategy.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Conor Browne

Conor Browne Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @brownecfm

Jun 27
1. The prevailing discourse surrounding mitigating against SARS-CoV-2 infection is rife with false dichotomies. At a societal level, the most obvious of these is the notion that mitigation measures stand in opposition to economic growth, when, in fact, the opposite is true:
2. Mitigation measures - specifically widespread air filtration or purification - would increase economic growth, by virtue of reducing ill health in the workforce (implementing widespread passive mitigations would also increase operational resilience to future pandemics).
3. Likewise, at a personal level, the prevailing false dichotomy is that mitigating against infection is incompatible with human flourishing. This is also not the case, on two levels:
Read 8 tweets
Jun 23
1. There have been some exceptional comments on this thread, and as a result I'm going to recount a personal experience from 2020 that explains why I come down much harder on the side of incompetence rather than conspiracy.
2. When the UK 'Eat Out to Help Out' scheme was launched in 2020, I told every single person I knew not to take advantage of it. It's important to remember two points here: that this was before the availability of vaccines and that everyone I told knew and trusted my expertise.
3. Only two people I knew didn't take advantage of the scheme (and one of those people still hasn't had Covid). Everyone else basically said something along the lines of, 'I know you're right, but I'm willing to take the risk to have a good night out'.
Read 7 tweets
Jun 4
1. With a new wave of Covid-19 incoming, and remembering my recent comments on the sustainability of risk mitigation, my current protocols are:

Vaccination every six months.

Masking in all shared indoor public spaces.

No masking outside.
2. NAAT testing for all guests (I use PlusLife). If NAAT testing is negative and no-one has symptoms, masks are removed.

I have a small group of friends who take the same precautions as I do; for this group, NAAT testing is not required. I trust them and they trust me.
3. If I need to see a doctor / dentist, or attend a screening procedure, I will attend whether the healthcare staff are masking or not. If I have to take my own mask off for an examination or procedure, I do so. I am all too aware that Covid is not the only risk to my health.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 24
1. This adds weight to a point I've been making for years, namely, that the important differential at the population level between now and the Spanish Flu of 1918-1920 is the considerably higher percentage of the global population who are immunocompromised.
2. People who were immunocompromised as a result of primary immunodeficiencies didn't live long in 1918, because antibiotic therapy didn't exist. Likewise, medication that causes immunosuppression didn't exist either.
3. Additionally, HIV / AIDS didn't exist in 1918. All of these factors explain why there are vastly more immunocompromised people now compared to then. As such, the global immune landscape is much more conducive to viral mutation in this pandemic than it was in 1918 - 1920.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 25
1. Perhaps the most damaging blowback from the response to Covid-19 in 2020 and 2021 is the mainstreaming of a public health ideology that is rooted in a dangerous combination of survivorship bias, nostalgia, and the naturalistic fallacy.
2. As a disease, Covid-19 elicits this widespread reaction because of what I refer to as its 'stretchiness' - the fact that it can cause disease on such a broad spectrum of severity, from asymptomatic infection to death and everything in between.
3. The assumption that one person's experience of Covid is representative of everyone's (barring the nebulous 'vulnerable') is the primary psychological driver of this. Although we should resist anthropomorphising a virus, this serves SARS-CoV-2 very well.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 26
1. To understand the navigation of an environment in which multiple and competing risks exist, a thought experiment - grounded in my own life - is useful. I am a recovered alcoholic, and my sobriety is the single most important element of my life.
2. If a genie was to appear before me and offer me lifelong and complete immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection if I drank a single alcoholic drink, I would immediately refuse; the risk of jeopardising my sobriety vastly outweighs the risk of Covid-19.
3. Likewise, if I felt at risk of picking up the bottle again as a result of the extensive precautions I take to avoid infection with SARS-CoV-2, I would reduce or drop those precautions in a heartbeat. A heartbeat.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(