There are two primary strains of right-wing Christian Nationalism in America at the moment. 🧵
1) the most extensive, called Seven Mountains theology, bubbled up from independent charismatic entrepreneurs like Lance Wallnau.
They rely on a novel interpretation of obscure biblical passages in Isaiah & Revelation that call for reclaiming 7 mountains of Christian social control, from government through education. If they succeed, then God will bless America. If they fail, then apocalypse now.
They have gone further and anointed Donald Trump as a messianic figure--what theologians call christological typology--and linked him to the biblical Persian King Cyrus, a pagan who protected the Israelites and fulfilled prophecy.
I call these people "entrepreneurs" quite literally. Lance Wallnau sold $45 "prayer coins" superimposing Trump's face over Cyrus's.
You might call this a "grift," though that assumes that Wallnau isn't sincere and is just flogging goods in the metaphorical temple square.
7 Mountains rhetoric is widespread, with political operatives like Charlie Kirk and Michael Flynn using the language at their God & Country tours of megachurches.
2) But while 7 Mountains might be the most prominent Christian Nationalist variant, there is also version percolating out of theologically reformed Presbyterian and Baptist circles.
This book in particular has been getting attention on Twitter.
It's not a good book--see @BrianGMattson on its demerits--but it's notable b/c it attempts to give an intellectual foundation to a movement that has been easy to ridicule as one step removed from snake handling. They're Claremont-ing, in other words.
The book is from Canon Press, which began as the vanity press for Douglas Wilson, a neo-Confederate Lost Cause apologist. (It's no accident that the author, Wolfe, has himself questioned interracial marriage.) This version of Christian Nationalism has deeper, hateful roots.
Although the theology is very different from 7 Mountains CN, this alt-Reformational CN is similar in this core regard:
Whether by rediscovery or invention, both are surfacing novel theological justifications for culture war politics rooted in Christian cultural status anxiety.
Invariably, both kinds of Christian Nationalist promote a similar political rhetoric steeped in fear of sinister, anti-Christian elites who are conniving to deconvert, degender, derace, and replace God-fearing Americans.
I'll end by noting that as a trained historian of religion & politics, right-wing Christian Nationalism is not a new phenomenon. American history is rife with variants of Christian Nationalism bubbling up, particularly at moments of intense religious & political anxiety.
The classic example is "Parson" Weems, the itinerant traveling book salesman and evangelical minister who concocted soothing fables about the virtuous Christian character of various founding fathers.
It's Weems who gave us Washington and the Cherry Tree, for instance:
It's also Weems who invented the story about George Washington praying at Valley Forge, a myth that I can tell you from personal experience lives on in the form of paintings in many a church lobby today.
Why would Weems spread these myths in the 1820s/30s?
Because Americans in general, and evangelical Americans in particular, were anxious.
They were the 1st post-Revolution generation. The Founders & veterans were dying off. Would the American experiment survive?
In the midst of the tumultuous market revolution, early industrialization, westward expansion, and religious upheaval, what would the future look like??
So entrepreneurs--literally--like Weems wove them comforting tales. Yes, America would survive and thrive as a nation because it was grounded in orthodox, religious faith. The Founders were evangelical Christians just like you.
See, look! Washington even prayed at Valley Forge!
Sidenote: the most famous GW at Valley Forge painting was made in 1975 anticipating the bicentennial by a Mormon painter named Arnold Friberg who studied with Norman Rockwell.
It's a reminder that Mitt Romney wasn't the first (or even the second) Mormon moment!
I mention Mormons as a reminder that there are older non-evangelical versions of Christian Nationalism. Joseph Smith codified American exceptionalism in the Book of Mormon in the same milieu that Parson Weems was operating in.
Thus the Missouri Garden of Eden, Mormon ancestors as the ten lost tribes, the Constitution & Declaration of Independence are considered literal sacred scripture, & so on. Mormonism has American Christian Nationalism in its bones.
Friberg's 1975 painting is also a reminder that the seventies were another era of Christian Nationalist resurgence. In 1977 two charismatic Christian Nationalists wrote a book called "The Light and the Glory," which sacralized America's national history.
It spread like wildfire in the new Christian homeschooling movement, through evangelical & pentecostal Christian bookstores, and was just hugely influential. I'd argue it's right up there in terms of internal influence w/ the Chronicles of Narnia & the Scofield Reference Bible.
Again, you can immediately sense the anxiety that underpinned the book's core message. Coming off the sixties counter-cultural revolutions and in the midst of what historians have called the "decade of nightmares" (the seventies), the fear pervades the text. From the intro:
Historians who were themselves confessing Christians tried to tell evangelicals that these were paranoid myths, but they were largely ignored. The odds of finding this book in your church bookstore is infinitesimally lower than finding "The Light and the Glory" on the shelf!
I could talk about other right-wing Christian Nationalists--Rushdoony-ites! Barton and the Wallbuilders!--but I want to end by noting that before you cast the first stone at the more outré varieties, bear in mind that Christian nationalisms are pervasive.
When politicians from both parties talk about America being a "city on a hill," borrowing the rhetoric from a Puritan colonist, that's Christian nationalism.
When you have a wedding ceremony at the Washington Memorial Chapel in Valley Forge, that's ritualistic participation in a form of Christian Nationalism.
If you stop at the "Stonewall Jackson Shrine," you're hearing a ghostly echo of a Christian Nationalist variant that emerged to contest other Christian Nationalisms.
In every case--whether it's one of which you approve or detest--remember that it is very American and very human, to want to sacralize one's political project. It might function as a soothing lie or as a political weapon, but it's always useful.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There is much that I could criticize, but let's focus on the core claim.
Lynch mobs were not an example of "untethered empathy." The feelings of white woman were merely offered as an excuse, a thin ex post facto justification, for the use of violence to enforce white supremacy.
To provide just one example, the spark that lit the 1921 Tulsa Massacre came when a black, teenage shoeshiner tripped while exiting an elevator and reflexively grabbed the arm of the white, female operator who reflexively screamed. Everyone was fine.
Here's how Elon Musk and Ron DeSantis accidentally exposed a trio of white supremacists: Pedro Gonzalez, Nate Hochman, and Richard Hanania. A 🧵.
(You can read the whole post by clicking the link in my bio.)
Three months, three scandals.
Pedro Gonzalez in June: anti-semitic & white nationalist text messages.
Nate Hochman in July: created DeSantis campaign video w/ fascist imagery.
Richard Hanania in August: alt-account w/ with eugenicist, racist, and misogynistic posts.
There are precedents -- think klansman & LA state legislator David Duke, ex-GOP operative Pat Buchanan and 90s 3rd parties -- but their racist views tended to bind them to the far right margins.
I've reviewed @realchrisrufo's new book for @reason. While one can read it as a cautionary tale about the extremes to which radical left activism can go -- both in the 60s and today -- Rufo ultimately imitates what he opposes. A 🧵.
Each section of the book has the same arc of rise & declension & rise again for an 60s radical intellectual: Herbert Marcuse, Angela Davis, Paulo Freire, & Derrick Bell. Rufo wants his readers to make a direct connection b/t current left-wing movements and 60s radicalism.
But Rufos relies on simplistic linguistic borrowing and a six-degrees-of-Kevin-Bacon logic to make those connections.
It is true that much popular Left terminology today -- eg, anti-racism, institutional racism, police brutality -- was coined or popularized by 60s radicals.
It's incredible that we could all watch the Wagner coup live on Google Maps. A 🧵.
As I readied for bed in the UK last night, I read about Wagner PMC's Yevgeny Prigozhin criticizing the justifications for Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
I didn't think too much of it until reports on Twitter said that Wagner troops were crossing the border back into Russia.
Could it be a coup in the ancien regime style, where courtiers jockey for control of the king's ear, justifying their rebellion as action on behalf of the king?
The classic text on the subject is “The Churching of America,” which emphasizes the fundamental connection between establishmentarianism & low adherence vs disestablishmentarianism & high adherence. https://t.co/Hr7zF23Xjeamazon.com/Churching-Amer…
It’s another reminder that the neo-Christian nationalists—whether of the high church (Wolfe) or low church variety (Joe Rigney)—are generally historical illiterates who rely on just-so stories.
Eg, no serious religious historian would simplistically say that the existence of a few state church establishments in the late-18th c was proof of founding establishmentarian intent when all were gone by the 1830s & most states rejected constitutional religious test clauses.
A student fashion show inspired by Paradise Lost brought down the mandolin-strumming president of a college that once billed itself as “the World’s Most Unusual University.” 🧵
I'm both a historian of 20th c America and a graduate of Bob Jones University, so I'm gonna unpack that truly bizarre sentence for you.
The imbroglio began with a student fashion show in December 2021. For his capstone project, fashion design student Matthew Foxx put together a runway show that explored the story of the gospel as embodied through renaissance-inspired clothing.