🧵 The re-writing of recent history by global north activists on the COP27 and its outcome is (to put it mildly) nauseating! It makes one question their independence and how much they're in touch with Global South voices they claim to care about. So to reclaim the space:
1. The 2 weeks in Sharm were a moment; a stop in a journey. The COP27 outcomes need to be evaluated based on the engagement of the actors through that journey! Ignoring that the US and the EU were telling us just a month ago that loss and damage won't happen and then reading...
...that they saved the day is genuinely dishonest and frankly insulting to the work many actors have done to exercise pressure. 2. The geopolitical context had an impact on COP27. From an African perspective (and I'm sure global south), it is the cherry on the cake to...
...hear a lot about the lack of delivery and no word on who is to blame! So let's say it: the historical polluters have failed us! We could have had a HUGE success had the pressure to deliver on pledges and add to them been duly put on them! Instead, we got empty rhetoric!
3. The cherry on the cake for many of us was hearing western leaders, one after one, repeating their "disappointment" for the "failure" to secure commitment to 1.5. So to be clear: they need to tell that to themselves, not lecture the global south! Refresh on emission increases:
UK: 9.2% increase in 2021
EU: 6.5% increase in 2021
USA: 6% increase in 2021
Africa as a CONTINENT (more than all the above populations combined): 6% increase in 2021
China - presumably their target (and not to defend it): 3.2%
Can we now re-focus?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵Some reflections on the Global Gateway proposal just released by the European Commission looking at 1) What does it put on the table, 2) is it really a 'new' package, and 3) is it a positive contribution to Africa-Europe relations. But 1st some context. ec.europa.eu/info/sites/def…
In 2007, the European commission launched an infrastructure Trust Fund, which was then put to rest in the multi-annual budget of 2014-2020 (although it was implemented up to 2019). Infra financing was at the time seen by European officials as a no-go.
The challenge presented by China has revived the debate around the decision of the EU to abandon infra financing. Today, is the result of the debate. The Biden administration, through the G&, has given more impetus to the debate. Today's EU proposal aligns itself ideologically...