I want to engage this question earnestly, b/c it’s a legit question. The answer is yes, I do look at left, too.
Left-wing activists are responsible for 2% of murders committed by political extremists in the US over the past decade; right-wing activists are responsible for 74%.
Furthermore, left-wing extremist violence is on a decades-long decline, while right-wing extremist violence is on the rise. washingtonpost.com/national/in-th…
The statistics on left-wing extremist violence vs right-wing extremist violence come from this report on extremist murders in the U.S. Similar figures have been reported in other analyses, too. adl.org/sites/default/…
Looking more broadly at terrorist attacks — not just extremist murders — right-wing attackers committed about 1/3 (~33%) of domestic terror attacks between 2010 and 2017. Another ~33% were attributed to unknown ideologies, while 13% were attributed to left-wing ideologies.
And this is the conclusion of a 2022 study that examined two datasets of politically-motivated extremist attacks:
“Across both datasets, we find that radical acts perpetrated by individuals associated with left-wing causes are less likely to be violent.” pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pn…
As I’ve emphasized previously while discussing this very topic: There’s a difference between objectivity and neutrality. I strive for objectivity — for the truth — not neutrality, which in this case presents a false balance between two unequal sides.
And please don’t go pile on the guy who asked me the original question. He’s allowed to ask questions, and I’m allowed to answer them. I think my answer is sufficient on its own and doesn’t require a pile-on to prove a point. Let’s make this place better by being better.
Just adding a few things to this thread:
Here’s a former FBI special agent — and to be clear, the FBI is not exactly known for its leftist sympathies — explaining that fatal extremist violence is almost exclusively a far-right, not far-left, phenomenon.
Per a Nov. 2018 report by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the number of far-right terrorist attacks in the US more than quadrupled between 2016 and 2017.
Another analysis found that every single one of the 50 extremist murders documented in 2018 was committed by a person or persons with ties to right-wing extremism. Right-wing extremists killed more people in 2018 than in any year since 1995. adl.org/murderandextre…
In the most recent iteration of this report, ADL found that “lethal extremist violence in 2021 was heavily dominated by right-wing extremism.”
All but three of the 29 murders (90%) documented in the report had ties to right-wing extremism. adl.org/murder-and-ext…
Of the 443 people killed at the hands of extremists in the past decade, 333 (or 75%) were killed by right-wing extremists.
Some more stats:
-30 yrs of antifascist activity in the US: 1 confirmed fatality (a nazi who was shot during an altercation in 1993).
-20 yrs of far-right extremist activity (1990-2012) in the US: 670 fatalities, 3,053 nonfatal injuries, & 4,420 attacks. cco.ndu.edu/Portals/96/Doc…
The source for these statistics on ideologically-motivated killings and violent attacks is the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point, which, again, is not exactly known as a left-wing organization. But they are known for being credible. ctc.westpoint.edu/wp-content/upl…
You’ve probably seen Nick Shirley’s video accusing Somali-run daycares in Minnesota of fraud. Hopefully you’ve also seen some of the follow-ups showing that security footage & operating hours disprove his central claim of “no children.”
X’s new “About this account” feature just accidentally revealed a vast network of covert foreign influence accounts posing as Americans but operating from overseas — the most sweeping public exposure of covert influence on a major platform since 2016. Story is linked below.
Some of these accounts have hundreds of thousands of followers. They present themselves as American patriots, veterans, moms, truck drivers, or lifelong Republicans. Many are explicitly MAGA. But their operators are posting from overseas while shaping U.S. political narratives.
It’s not just MAGA accounts, but mostly it is. Several large anti-Trump accounts were also revealed as foreign-run, as were public health networks. The common denominator is deception: pretending to be American participants in US politics while pushing highly divisive content.
I wrote about a secret tactic shaping what you see online — one almost no one’s talking about. It’s called Moderation Sabotage, and it’s how political digital operatives overwhelm social media defenses so lies go viral before truth can catch up. Link is posted below.🧵
Imagine flooding the system so completely that moderators can’t respond in time. That’s the playbook: swamp the filters, delay enforcement, and let false or incendiary content live long enough to trend.
By the time platforms react, the damage is done.
This isn’t random chaos. It’s deliberate. Trump’s digital allies — the same architects behind Stop the Steal — have refined Moderation Sabotage into an election-year weapon. Rather than hacking the code, they’re hacking the people who keep the code honest.
NEW: AI campaigns are learning to run themselves — and using our data to do it. Without stricter safeguards, we may soon see AI controlling the very governing bodies that could enforce those safeguards in the first place..
(Link in next tweet).
I took 2 months off due to health problems, and when I returned, I expected to see the normal disinformation playbook in action. Indeed, that was waiting for me. But so was something else: AI is now running for office & pushing humans out of the process.
We’ve already seen AI playing a big role in politics, including several attempts to get an AI system elected to office in order to act as the decision-maker, while humans would simply act as the body for AI’s policies and initiatives. weaponizedspaces.substack.com/p/ai-political…
The “controversy” over Sydney Sweeney is absurd and largely fake, but there’s one thing worth paying attention to — the tried and tested formula used by the right-wing outrage machine to manufacture liberal fury and then bait the left into making it a reality.
Here’s how it works:
First, invent the outrage. This usually involves picking a neutral or mildly provocative event and finding something about it to frame as being offensive to the left. In this case, the slogan (“Sydney Sweeney has great jeans”).
Second, flood the zone. Carry out a social media blitz and manufacture the appearance of outrage by gaming the algorithm with repetitive content, which will then get pushed into trending feeds and recommended videos — creating the perception that people actually care about it.
I just published the 2nd major piece in my series about algorithmic tyranny — this time, revealing how Trump & the right-wing outrage machine are not just gaming algorithms, but rewriting the rules so they can keep gaming them indefinitely. I call it the Feedback Loop Coup.
Last week, I introduced the concept of Reverse Algorithmic Capture, a tactic used to force platforms to rewrite their rules through political & legal pressure. Feedback Loop Coups are similar, except they exploit *existing* rules to rewire algorithms & seize control of your feed.
We all know by now that platforms operate on the same fundamental principle: the more engagement a post receives, the more the algorithm pushes it into other people's feeds. The faster this engagement occurs, the more "urgent" the algorithm considers it, and the wider it spreads.