Lisa Rubin Profile picture
Nov 22 8 tweets 2 min read
As others celebrated or denigrated news that the Manhattan DA is considering charges against Trump for his hush-money payments to Stormy Daniels, a wise colleague asked me an important question: How are those charges NOT time barred? 1/
nytimes.com/2022/11/21/nyr…
The answer is kind of amazing. Remember when, in 2019, Trump moved his permanent residence to FL, likely for tax purposes? 2/

nytimes.com/2019/10/31/us/…
In doing so, he might have saved himself some $$--but he also inadvertently pressed paused on the statutes of limitations for various New York crimes. How, you ask? 3/
New York's criminal code says that “[i]n calculating the time limitation applicable to commencement of a criminal action," courts may not include "[a]ny period following the commission of the offense during which (i) the defendant was continuously outside this state.” 4/
And New York's highest court clarified in 1999 that "continously outside this state" means “all periods of a day or more that a nonresident defendant is out-of-State." Those periods are then added up and any statute of limitations is paused, or tolled for that time. 5/
What does this mean for Trump? It means that as of ~Sept. 2019, the clock for any NY statute of limitations stopped ticking during any period of a day or more that he was NOT in New York. 6/
And as of Oct. 31, 2019, NBC News calculated that Trump had spent only 20 days at Trump Tower since his inauguration. If that pattern continued -- and Trump likely spent even less time in NY since -- the NYDA has *years* left to charge Trump. 7/
So it turns out time is on Alvin Bragg's side, not Trump's. So much for avoiding NY's reach. FIN

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lisa Rubin

Lisa Rubin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lawofruby

Nov 22
Trump's team specializes in last-minute relitigation and surprise motions. Not only did they move to dismiss the NYAG's $250 million fraud case *again* last night, but today, 3+ months after the Mar-a-Lago search, they've moved to unseal the search warrant affidavit. 1/
Why? To cast doubt on the DOJ investigator and lawyers' integrity literally hours before they appeal the appointment of a special master in that investigation. 2/

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Never mind the lack of statutory and constitutional bases for unsealing during an investigation. Just as Trump went from attacking individual reporters to designating the entire mainstream media "fake news," he is misusing a federal case to smear career DOJ/FBI staff. 3/
Read 4 tweets
Nov 22
DOJ goes to court today in Atlanta to argue that the special master process never should have gotten off the ground. Given that Ray Dearie's report is due in less than a month, isn't this much ado about nothing? I don't think so. 1/
As @emptywheel has written, in order to bring charges against Trump in the records investigation, DOJ (and now the Special Counsel) must, at a minimum, resolve what evidence is within its possession and right to use. 2/
@emptywheel Therefore, if the special master order was unlawful in the first place, DOJ can resume its review and use of *all* documents seized during the August Mar-a-Lago search. That would remove a key temporal and substantive barrier to indictment. 3/
Read 7 tweets
Nov 21
NYDA Alvin Bragg might be reviving the hush-money case against Trump, an investigation his office started (and stopped, at the behest of DOJ) years ago. You might think this “zombie theory” has zero to do with today’s realities. You would be wrong. 1/ nytimes.com/2022/11/21/nyr…
To bring new charges against Trump, prosecutors are considering leveraging Allen Weisselberg, who testified for 3 days last week in the Trump Org. criminal trial and whose testimony is central to elements of the ongoing civil fraud case brought by NYAG. 2/
To pressure Weisselberg into cooperating against Trump, NYDA is considering bringing insurance fraud charges against him that are wholly unrelated to the hush-money scandal. NYDA could also have additional leverage if Weisselberg was not truthful on the stand last week. 3/
Read 7 tweets
Nov 17
A New York court has entered a supplemental order today outlining former SDNY Judge Barbara Jones's access & duties as the independent monitor of the Trump Org. And they are more extensive than most folks appreciate. 1/

iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDoc…
Let's start with her duties. Yes, she's not empowered to monitor their day-to-day business activities. But she now oversees the submission financial information for the preparation of his 2022 financial statements by outside accountants . . . 2/
. . . as well as the submission of financial disclosures to *anyone,* including but not limited to lenders, insurers, and any tax authorities, from NYC to the feds. 3/
Read 10 tweets
Nov 16
The conventional wisdom is that by announcing his presidential candidacy last night, Trump is trying to prop up his victimhood, push back against the investigators, and push out DeSantis. But if you ask campaign finance folks, he also made his own grift harder. Why?
Thanks to squishy campaign finance laws and lax enforcement, it's relatively easy to siphon off $$ from many types of political fundraising committees--but not campaign committees. 2/
And after a person becomes a candidate (the FEC has a two-part test for when someone's candidacy starts), he can only raise for his own race through an official campaign committee, whose funds cannot be exploited for personal use, at least not easily or lawfully. 3/
Read 9 tweets
Nov 14
And it's official: SDNY U.S. Attorney Damian Williams asks Judge Paul Oetken to end the appointment of Special Master Barbara Jones because no indictment of Rudy Giuliani is coming. Image
This doesn't mean Rudy is out of the woods with respect to 1/6-related investigations. But it would seem DOJ is done looking at potential foreign lobbying-related charges and won't be bringing any.
And because it's been expected that SDNY's Rudy investigation was over for some time, my guess was that SDNY sent this letter to signal to a NY state court that retired SDNY Judge Barbara Jones's dance card was free. Why?
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(