There you will find lots of pro tips about:
❓ Why we set expectations
❓ What kinds of expectations to set
❓ How to set expectations
3/ I’m not going to rehash those concepts here.
So…what ELSE do subspecialty educators need to know about setting expectations?
Let’s think about some unique considerations (and challenges!) for teachers on consult teams...
4/ First, let’s acknowledge the reality that learners are constantly parachuting in & rotating off our consult teams.
I’ve illustrated how this plays out - attending & learner start/end dates rarely line up!
This means setting expectations "just once" is an unrealistic goal.
5/ Second, other than our own fellows, most learners on our consult teams are visitors doing an elective. This means they are far less familiar w/ our:
📚 Subject matter
🔀 Workflow
💬 Cultural “norms”
(and, any assumptions they have about our specialty may be incorrect!)
6/ This impacts the KINDS of expectations we have to set w/ learners.
For example:
1⃣ What & how they should expect to LEARN
2⃣ What they will be expected to DO (as members of the consult TEAM)
3⃣ How they will be expected to ACT (as representatives of the consult SERVICE)
7/ For 1⃣ I will again reference @GStetsonMD who shared this framework of “expectation categories”
9/ You might think it’s repetitive to go over these expectations EVERY time a learner joins the team, when that happens constantly.
It’s not.
In fact, going over them each time:
☑️ Resets everyone back to a common standard
☑️ Allows existing team-members to chime in w/ pearls
10/ Additionally, reminding learners of the concrete “to dos” of their experience on a consult team builds toward several “meta” learning objectives.
In other words, intentional reminders of what we as consultants are doing can make learners better "end users" of our services!
11/ Finally let’s turn to 3⃣ - how learners will be expected to ACT as representatives of the consult service.
For better or worse, every consult service has a “reputation." Many learners come to their subspecialty rotation with that “rep” in mind based on prior experiences...
12/ We need to be mindful of this when setting expectations, b/c while on the consult TEAM, learners are ambassadors for the consult SERVICE.
This of course involves role-modeling how we talk about & interact w/ other teams.
But it can also include situation-specific guidance.
13/ Some examples:
❓ How to discuss our role in a case w/ a patient who is unaware we have been consulted?
❓ How to communicate recommendations that may be ‘unpalatable’?
❓ How to interact w/ another consult service with whom we disagree?
What others have YOU encountered?
14/ How do we set expectations for these scenarios?
I’ve gotten better at this by reflecting on situations that I’ve seen handled poorly to create “anticipatory guidance”, which I turn into “what if” ❓
🤔 What if the team says...
🤔 What if the patient asks...
🤔 What if...
15/ You cannot prepare your learners for every scenario. In future threads we will share strategies for intentionally developing these skills.
Until then, remember that part of expectation setting is prepping your learners to be effective representatives of your specialty!
16/ To recap:
I’ve discussed 3 unique considerations for setting expectations on a consult team & shared strategies to navigate these issues.
Many of these sometimes feel redundant or “obvious”, but, when done effectively, I find the experience ⬆️enjoyable (& ⬆️predictable!)
17/ Next week I will kick off a series of threads about “Teaching Consultant Skills,” starting w/ “Receiving Consults.”
-Maybe you don’t have a consult “team” to teach
-Maybe you want to showcase your specialty & recruit interested trainees
-Maybe you want to build ties to other service lines
What to do?
This week:
2/ @JenniferSpicer4 and I have spent the last few weeks exploring the "why", the "who", and the "when" of teaching the primary team in our role as consultants.
Now let's turn to the "what".
What repertoire of teaching scripts should we strive to develop as specialists?
1/ You staff a new consult w/ your team. You share pearls & make a plan.
Then:
🩻 You review the CT w/ radiology.
🤝 You chat w/ another consult service.
🗣️ You deliver your recs at the workroom.
📲 You call night float w/ an update.
So many opportunities to teach!
This week:
2/ Last week @JenniferSpicer4 kicked off our segment on "Teaching the Primary Team" by focusing on "The Why."
This week, for "The Who", I want to think beyond just the primary team to identify the many different learners we encounter as consultants.
3/ Why?
Even though the primary team is the obvious audience for teaching - their "ask" is what invited us into the case to begin with! - we usually interface with many other teams in the process of rendering our opinion.
Them: “We want you on board because ____ is 'refusing' to do this procedure but ____ says it's needed. You're the tiebreaker.”
You: [sigh] “OK.”
⌛️
Patient: “Ah! ____ said YOU'RE the one holding up my discharge!”
You: 🙄
Feeling triggered yet?
This week:
2/ Conflict is inevitable when working within a system.
What do I mean when I say “conflict”? 🤔 For the purposes of this 🧵 let me paraphrase a huge body of literature w/ the following definition:
Conflict is “disagreement” that causes (or has the potential to cause) “harm”.
3/ Let's unpack this a bit more w/ a focus on conflict in consultative care.
"Disagreement" is a broad term.
It can stem from...
↪️ real OR perceived differences in opinion
↪️ about diagnosis OR management
↪️ between the primary team & the consultant OR between consultants