The Cultural Tutor Profile picture
Nov 22, 2022 25 tweets 9 min read Read on X
The small city of Lugo in northern Spain has a special secret.

It is the *only* place in the world to have a complete set of intact Roman walls. They were built 2,000 years ago and surround the entire old town.

But how did they survive? That's where it gets interesting...
The city of Lugo was originally founded as Lucus Augusti in 13 BC.

It was a vital outpost and so in the 3rd century AD the Romans built a huge defensive fortification around the city, over 2,000 metres long and up to 15 metres tall, with over 80 towers.
Even Rome itself, despite being swamped by ruins of every imaginable kind, does not have intact fortifications like Lugo.

Its Aurelian Walls, dating from the 3rd century AD, are rather more imposing and impressive.

But they survive in disconnected fragments:
And Hisarya in Bulgaria, once a Roman military stronghold in Thrace, has some incredibly impressive walls.

They survive at their original, intimidating height in parts, but are otherwise largely ruinous, and don't fully surround the city.
So why does Lugo still have this extraordinary circuit of walls - over two kilometres long - in such good condition?

It might have something to do with the materials from which they were built, of slate and shale rather than brick:
But the truth is that, as you might suspect, they're not *completely* original.

Over the centuries these great walls have been restored, renovated, and tampered with many times.

Consider the gates. Some of the original Roman gates survive (five in all) like the Porta Mina:
While five larger gates were added in the 19th century as the city of Lugo grew in size and more gates were needed for traffic and pedestrian circulation.

Like the Bishop's Gate:
And since the 19th century consistent efforts have been made to restore them, not limited to removing overgrowth (as below) but including more invasive work to rebuild damaged sections.

This has continued through the 20th and into the 21st century - an ongoing municipal project.
Which is part of the reason for their most striking feature (beyond the overall quality of their condition): this spacious walkway running along their entirety.

It's not really an original Roman feature, but its creation has given the city something utterly unique.
And so this touches on one of the most interesting debates in the realms of history, architecture, and archaeology: restoration v preservation.

Should we preserve ruins as they are, to prevent further degradation, or restore them to how they once looked?
This debate really kicked off in the 1800s.

On one side were those like the scholar and artist John Ruskin (1819-1900) who believed that all buildings, not only ruins, should be left exactly as they are. A sketch from John Ruskin's The Seven Lamps of Architecture
He belived that a building's age was its truest quality, and that restoration was "as impossible as raising the living from the dead."

And therefore that "no restoration should ever be attempted, otherwise than... in the sense of preservation from further injuries."
Ruskin's position was at least partially related to the wave of restoration in 19th century Britain.

There was a boom in church attendance and so the Victorians set about restoring all those old Medieval churches, ensuring they were fit for purpose.
But their restorations were often more like renovations, either totally unsympathetic to the original (rather like St. Alban's Cathedral, below) or sometimes more like overly sentimental, inauthentic rebuilds.

It was this sort of thing that Ruskin found so troublesome.
While French architect Viollet-le-Duc (1814-1879) embodied the other side of the debate.

He was the foremost restorer of his age, and took on projects all around France, like the Notre Dame.

Under his guise it was, after significant work, restored to its Medieval glory.
He also rebuilt the original Medieval spire (or fleche) of the Notre Dame, which had been taken down in the 1700s.

His version, which burnt down in 2019, was slightly different to the original.

Does that make the Notre Dame inauthentic?
One of Viollet-le-Duc's greatest successes was the restoration of Carcasonne, a Medieval citadel in southern France.

The local government had decided to demolish its walls but, thanks to public outcry, Viollet-le-Duc was tasked with their complete restoration.
Throughout the 20th century both approaches have been adopted.

For example, the Ba'athist regime of Saddam Hussein in Iraq started (but did not finish) a total restoration of the Ziggurat of Ur, a three thousand year old Sumerian temple.
But it's more common to leave ruins as they are, performing structural repairs at most to prevent them from totally falling apart.

Not just for famous monuments like the Parthenon - whose restoration seems unthinkable - but even for much smaller, locally-significant ruins.
And yet the restored walls of Lugo have given the people of the city something truly special.

They are an object of civic pride and, though a part of Lugo's ancient history, are still very much alive and in use; people go for walks and runs on them, or just hang around there.
Another interesting result of Lugo's maintained wall is the way it creates a real city centre, now largely pedestrianised, with narrow streets and great mixed-use spaces.

Regulations to limit the height of buldings and potentially damaging construction work have furthered this.
Which brings us to something else about Lugo's wonderful Roman walls.

Even if they have been restored and well-maintained, that doesn't tell the full story of their survival; it is at least partially thanks to simple preservation that they remain...
Because most European cities had walls and fortifications of some kind, whether Roman or Medieval.

But, in the 19th century particularly, they were deemed subsidiary to the demands of urban expansion and accordingly demolished.

Not Lugo - those new gates were a middle ground.
The City of London was once surrounded by a Roman wall which had been further fortified in the Middle Ages.

But as its defensive purpose disappeared and London's population expanded, the wall was largely demolished, leaving only scattered fragments hidden around the city.
And so they are the Roman walls of Lugo.

A story of restoration versus preservation, and of preservation versus demolition; of history as a still-living, still-useful part of civic life, or as a simple ruin.

To restore or to preserve? Lugo offers one potential answer.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Cultural Tutor

The Cultural Tutor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @culturaltutor

Aug 31
We spend more than 90% of our time inside, so why do we design so many of our interiors like this?

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting.

It's generic, boring, and genuinely bad for our physical and psychological health... Image
Not all interiors look like this, but too many do, and more all the time.

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting, neutral colours for details, everything plastic, shiny, and rectangular.

This has become the standard for new buildings (and refurbishments) around the world. Image
A common response is that some people like it, or at least don't mind it.

Maybe, but that's the problem.

The sum of all tastes is no taste at all, and if our aim is simply to make things that people "don't mind" then we end up with blandness. Image
Read 22 tweets
Aug 21
The world's most famous neoclassical buildings are kind of boring and generic when you actually look at them.

It's even hard to tell them apart: which one below is Versailles, or Buckingham Palace?

So here's why neoclassical architecture (although it's nice) is overrated: Image
Buckingham Palace, despite being one of the world's most famous and visited buildings, is essentially quite boring and uninspiring from the outside.

There's a certain stateliness to it, but (like most big neoclassical buildings) it's really just a box wrapped in pilasters. Image
The same is true of Versailles.

Again, it's evidently pretty (largely thanks to the colour of its stone) but there's something weirdly plain about it, almost standardised.

Plus the emphasis on its horizontal lines makes it feel very low-lying, undramatic, and flat. Image
Read 26 tweets
Aug 17
These aren't castles, palaces, or cathedrals.

They're all water towers, literally just bits of infrastructure relating to water management.

Is it worth the additional cost and resources to make things look like this... or is it a waste? Image
These old water towers are an architectural subgenre of their own.

There are hundreds, mostly Neo-Gothic, and all add something wonderful to the skylines of their cities.

Like the one below in Bydgoszcz, Poland, from 1900.

But, most importantly, they're just infrastructure. Image
We don't think of infrastructure as something that can improve how a town looks and feels.

Infrastructure is necessary to make life convenient; but also, we believe, definitionally boring.

These water towers prove that doesn't have to, and shouldn't be, the case. Image
Read 24 tweets
Aug 8
If one thing sums up the 21st century it's got to be all these default profile pictures.

You've seen them literally thousands of times, but they're completely generic and interchangeable.

Future historians will use them to symbolise our current era, and here's why... Image
To understand what any society truly believed, and how they felt about humankind, you need to look at what they created rather than what they said.

Just as actions instead of words reveal who a person really is, art always tells you what a society was actually like.
And this is particularly true of how they depicted human beings — how we portray ourselves.

That the Pharaohs were of supreme power, and were worshipped as gods far above ordinary people, is made obvious by the sheer size and abundance of the statues made in their name: Image
Read 23 tweets
Aug 6
This is St. Anne's Church in Vilnius, Lithuania.

It's over 500 years old and the perfect example of a strange architectural style known as "Brick Gothic".

But, more importantly, it's a lesson in how imagination can transform the way our world looks... Image
Vilnius has one of the world's best-preserved Medieval old towns.

It's a UNESCO World Heritage Site, filled with winding streets and architectural gems from across the ages.

A testament to the wealth, grandeur, and sophistication of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Image
Among its many treasures is the Church of St Anne, built from 1495 to 1500 under the Duke of Lithuania and (later) King of Poland, Alexander I Jagiellon.

It's not particularly big — a single nave without aisles — but St Anne's makes up for size with its fantastical brickwork. Image
Read 18 tweets
Jul 31
Tell your friends! Your enemies! Your lovers!

The Spanish edition of my new book, El Tutor Cultural, is now available for pre-order.

It'll be released on 22 October — and you can get it at the link in my bio.

To celebrate, here are the 10 best things I've written about Spain: from why Barcelona looks the way it does to one of the world's most underrated modern architects, from the truth about Pablo Picasso to the origins of the Spanish football badge...Image
What makes Barcelona such a beautiful city? It wasn't an accident — this is the story of how the modern, beloved Barcelona was consciously created:

Image
And, speaking of Barcelona, here's why the renovation of the Camp Nou is — although necessary — a shame:

Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(