The Balenciaga campaign has girls holding BDSM teddy bears and includes photographs of the court decision that legalised some virtual child sexual abuse material in the US.

There is a long history of allusions to child sexual abuse within "high" culture, art and theory.
Throughout the 20th century, sexual violence against children & women has been depicted in the fine arts, cinema and intellectual culture as a courageous unveiling of hidden truths ie the open tolerance of child sexual abuse by French novelists & intellectuals until #metooinceste
Acceptance or allusions to child sexual abuse is a strategy for artists and intellectuals to mark themselves as more daring or sophisticated than the masses. We see this strategy used across a range of settings from fashion to art and academia.
Balenciaga has now pulled the campaign and is blaming unnamed third parties for the shoot.

Perhaps they didn't know about the CSAM court documents but they could hardly miss the kids holding teddy bears in bondage outfits. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Salter

Michael Salter Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mike_salter

Nov 23
In light of the attention to the Balenciaga shoot, it's worth noting the 2020 article in Australian Feminist Studies defending a sexualised fashion shoot with prepubescent models from the mid-1990s. tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
The shoot has young girls in revealing, low cut dresses (exposed sternum and back) and provocative poses, including one lying flat over a table. One girl is posed next to a teddy bear that appears to be masturbating.
The photos were controversial at the time, which the article decries as a "moral panic" about "child pornography". Instead, we are told that the photos were forging a "visual trajectory for rethinking childhood through a queer affective prism".
Read 7 tweets
Oct 30
Make no mistake about it, there are well funded programs, clinicians and academics who want to "destigmatise" the desire to sexually abuse children. They believe that this will somehow (?) prevent child sexual abuse.
They use the language of "public health" and "prevention" but they are forensic psychs/researchers with no public health or primary prevention training. They see stigma solely as a negative force that prevents paedophiles from accessing clinical treatment.
They have no familiarity with the social benefit of stigma in setting normative boundaries and acting as a guide to acceptable behaviour. Those of us with actual public health training and an understanding of social norms recognise that stigma has a role in prevention.
Read 8 tweets
Oct 5
In the current furore over queer theory and child sexual abuse - a revealing moment in Pat Califia's second edition of "Public Sex", where he reflects on his previous writings that normalised child sexual abuse and defended the sale of child sexual abuse material.
There's been lots of speculation about why people might use theory to trivialise/normalise child sexual abuse. I personally think that this is one of the most common reasons - as a defence against their own unresolved vulnerabilities and traumas.
Early in my career, a senior female academic challenged my work on organised abuse, claiming that adult/child sex wasn't harmful. She explained that she had a 40yo "boyfriend" when she was a child who took photos of her, and she turned out fine. He had other "girlfriends" too.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 4
How on earth did an academic who wrote papers on "cumming on or possibly even with a child" end up the trustee of a children's charity?
Universities have incubated self-consciously transgressive, anti-normative writing about children's "desires" and "sexual agency" for decades, incentivising young academics in particular to take more extreme positions to carve out their own "shocking" niche in the marketplace.
We've reached a tipping point where those academics are now intersecting with child welfare and child protection issues, and it's an entirely predictable disaster. Child safeguarding is fundamentally about boundaries, queer theory is about the dissolution of boundaries.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 2
Thought experiment -

I buy some land on a busy road and build a playhouse stocked with toys and games. I throw the doors open and anyone can come in for free. I make money by selling advertising space on the walls of the playhouse.
Children love the playhouse and they are a lucrative market, so I encourage them in. I don't want to pay for staff to check ID at the door or supervise the playhouse. It's fairly common that men come in off the street to sexually abuse children in the playhouse.
The govt has decided that my playhouse is a special kind of company. They have provided me with immunity from civil liability or criminal charges linked to abuse in my playhouse. I don't want to change my lucrative business model and I don't have to.
Read 9 tweets
Apr 21
The term "minor attracted" (instead of "paedophile") was coined on Boychat in the late 1990s. Boychat is a site for men who want to sexually abuse boys.

It was then picked up by a number of pro-paedophile groups in the 2000s (some anti-contact, some pro-contact).
The (self-proclaimed) anti-contact "MAPS" received sympathy from some academics & psychs who began using the term in their own work over the last decade.

These researchers and practitioners are now arguing that "MAPS" are stigmatised by the assumption that they are abusers.
The problem is - there are no reliable figures on the proportion of paedophiles who are actually non-offending.

Is it 5% or 50%? We don't know and that's a problem, because we don't take risks with child safeguarding.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(