𝙂𝙐𝙈𝘽𝙔 Profile picture
Nov 23, 2022 12 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Yesterday was the 59th anniversary of the day #CIAkilledJFK, and I happen to be on vacation in Pensacola. So let me tell you a story about how this building I passed by yesterday—the old Thiesen Building on Panafox, once the tallest skyscraper in Florida—connects to JFK's murder. Image
On March 17, 1964, Hank Killam was found dead with his throat slashed some 50 ft from the shattered windows of the Linen Department Store, on the building's first floor. Killam, it turns out, had connections to both Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby. ImageImageImage
Four months prior to his death, Killam was living in Dallas, working as a house painter. His wife, Wanda, was a dancer at Jack Ruby's Carousel Club, while a friend Killiam sometimes painted houses with, John Carter, lived at the same boarding house as Oswald. ImageImage
The HSCA's report identifies Wanda Killam as one of the closes links between Oswald and Ruby, noting that Wanda was not only an employee of Ruby's but his "close friend" as well and that she was also "friendly" with Oswald's boarding housemate John Carter. Image
After JFK's death, Hank was questioned by federal agents and soon come to believe "plotters" were following him. Fleeing Dallas to escape them, he moved to Pensacola, to Tampa, and then back to Pensacola, certain that agents were tracking him every step of the way. ImageImage
In Pensacola, Hank reported being followed by a man dressed as a priest & hinted to his own minister that what he knew about "that thing in Dallas" would lead to his death.

"I'm a dead man," Hank would claim. "They're going to get me—but I've run as far as I'm going to run." ImageImageImage
On March 17, 1964, Hank's prophecy would prove eerily correct. Around 4 AM, Hank was called on the phone at his mom's house. He got dressed and was soon after picked up by a car. 30 minutes later, he would be dead. Image
Killam's death was ruled a suicide by police. Coroner A.H. Northup, however, ruled it an accident. Neither party was made aware of the discrepancy until 3 years later. Said Northup: "In 10 years as a medical examiner, I've never heard of a man trying to kill himself this way." Image
Indeed, the suicide theory is too ridiculous to treat seriously. Hank would've needed to be inside the department store and jumped out. How'd he get in? And if he did, why was the slit throat his only injury? And who offs themselves by jumping out of a first-floor window anyway? Image
Interestingly, the same cop who would respond to the scene of Killam's death, had earlier that night dropped by Hank's mom's house to find Hank terrified that he was going to be killed. ImageImage
What did Killam know that would've put such a target on his back? Perhaps he could establish a clear connection between Ruby and Oswald. Or maybe, his knowledge of the JFK plot goes even deeper... Image
According to a 1967 Enquirer report (from which much of this thread is drawn), Killam was a long-time police informant. More intriguing, in the months leading up to the assassination, Killam was moving in between Dallas & another city with major ties to the JFK plot, New Orleans. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 𝙂𝙐𝙈𝘽𝙔

𝙂𝙐𝙈𝘽𝙔 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gumby4christ

May 3
🧵Interesting moment from the Covid Select Subcommittee's interrogation of Peter Daszak I'd like to unpack.

Daszak claims DARPA didn't reject DEFUSE due to safety concerns but rather over its cost. (He's previously made this claim to The Intercept, but now does so under oath.)
Daszak says "the only information we received from DARPA about the reasons for turning us down" came during an exit interview. Daszak previously described this interview as an apparently voluntary process for those who didn't receive funding. theintercept.com/2022/03/11/cov…
Image
This begs the question (previously raised by @Rossana38510044) as to whether the unsigned, undated DARPA rejection letter released by DRASTIC is completely authentic. And, if authentic, was it ever sent to EcoHealth or was it only a draft?
Read 10 tweets
Jan 17
The talking point from lab-leak proponents is that DARPA rejected EcoHealth's DEFUSE proposal because it was too risky. (If you read the letter closely, it's not clear this is true.) However, in a March 2, 2018 meeting, DARPA reviewer Jim Gimlett did not raise any risk concerns. Image
Gimlett did, however, note that DARPA was not able to fund all proposals and may partially fund proposals or fund later stages of proposals. This gibes with the letter written (though not signed) by Gimlett which noted "several components" of DEFUSE were "potentially fundable."
Image
Image
Gimlett also noted in his 3/2/18 meeting with Daszak that one of the primary issues with DEFUSE was validation. Lack of validation was one of the reasons cited for rejecting DEFUSE. Image
Read 9 tweets
Jan 17
Last month, @emilyakopp of @USRightToKnow published an article about the infamous DEFUSE proposal based on documents obtained from USGS, a DEFUSE partner. However, USRTK uploaded only a portion of those records.

I have obtained the full FOIA cache: archive.org/details/2021-0…
@emilyakopp @USRightToKnow Scientist and natural-origin proponent @flodebarre also appears to have obtained the same cache of documents. She too has refused to publish the full batch, instead plucking out small excerpts in support of this thread:
@emilyakopp @USRightToKnow @flodebarre (If you can't see the quoted tweet above, that's because Flo blocked me months ago.)
Read 8 tweets
Sep 1, 2023
I do not in any way agree with GoFundMe taking down the Grayzone's fundraiser, but, since I've yet to see anyone else mention it, I do think it's worth putting on the record that Max Blumenthal has reportedly agitated for such takedowns in the past. observer.com/2016/01/its-on…
Image
The Observer article reports that Max "pressured" GoFundMe to remove a fundraiser by (virulently pro-Israel pseudo-rabbi) Shmuley Boteach to buy a NYT ad tying then-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to Max via his dad, long-time Clinton consigliere Sidney Blumenthal. Image
However, the Observer's only apparent source is Boteach himself who merely said he "believes" Max contacted GoFundMe directly, just as he had written to Huffington Post editor Ryan Grim to decry an op-ed attacking him written by Boteach. Image
Read 8 tweets
Jul 26, 2023
Two months after dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the US military began drafting a secret plan to nuke 20 Soviet Cities in a "prevenative" surprise attack without provocation or warning. https://t.co/0glssyr2Jparchive.org/details/isbn_0…
Image
This plan, known as JIC 329 (or "Strategic Vulnerability of the USSR to a Limited Air Attack") acknowledged that the Soviets posed no immediate threat to the US. Decimated by WWII and lacking a navy, the USSR was in a dire position relative to the largely unscathed US military.
Image
Image
Knowing this, JIC 329 recommended a surprise barrage of nuclear strikes if it appeared that the Soviets "would eventually gain the capability of either attacking the US or rebuffing a US attack." (Kaku/Axelrod) Image
Read 21 tweets
Apr 17, 2023
The new Senate Covid-origin report, primarily authored by biodefense ghoul Robert Kadlec, badly misrepresents the data on early circulation.
Kadlec, citing only to the WHO's meta-analysis of studies on early circulation excludes an Italian study included in the WHO report, which found 111/959 pre-pandemic blood samples positive for antibodies dating back to Sept. 2019. cdn.who.int/media/docs/def… ImageImage
This study had been the subject of some controversy, and the WHO report includes a footnote that the samples would be retested to confirm results. That follow-up study was published in Dec. 2021 and corroborated positive results dating back to Oct. 2019. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35062265/ ImageImage
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(