Here’s what neither the Soviets nor Russia’s leadership today want you to know:
The Baltic republics were illegally annexed as a consequence of the Nazi-Soviet pact (or MRP). The movement to restore our independence was based around our complete rejection of Nazis & Soviets. 🧵
Just as Kremlin propaganda narratives seek to paint Ukrainians as fascists for defending their sovereignty and lives against Russia’s genocide, it also continues to distort history with the same narrative to justify the previous occupation of the Baltic states.
Let’s rewind…
Estonia, Latvia, & Lithuania declared independence in 1918 - from both German & Russian control. Russia eventually agreed to recognise the territorial integrity of all 3 countries (& vice versa).
But in 1939, the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany signed the Molotov–Ribbentrop pact. They called it “a non-aggression pact” but its key secret clause was to aggressively divide up sovereign European states like the Baltics into their empires.
Needless to say, people around Europe and the world actually opposed to the Nazis were devastated by the news - and that was before the secret clause and the full extent of Nazi-Soviet mutual cooperation to follow was fully understood.
It led to the invasion of Poland, which started WW2. Here’s Soviet and Nazi soldiers greeting each other in Poland as allies at the time.
During the same period, Soviet troops also invaded the Baltic republics and staged their takeover here based on the MRP.
The Soviet troops overthrew the Baltic governments and staged their own fake elections for puppet pro-Soviet administrations that then “requested” Soviet annexation. Here’s a clue from Estonia as to how democratic that was. Soviet troops were literally inside Parliament.
The Soviets also began mass repressions, including deportations.
Some say: “but those were targeted at fascists”.
Mass Soviet deportations in the Baltics were targeted primarily at women, children & elderly. As a reminder, the Soviets were allied with the Nazis when this began.
To Stalin’s shock, the Nazis turned on the Soviets after 2 years of their wartime alliance - bringing further immense devastation & repression to the Baltics from Nazi occupation before the Soviets returned to continue their own occupation in the same manner as agreed in the MRP.
Defenders of the Nazi-Soviet pact use the same excuses to justify it. We’ve heard them all before and wrote up a separate thread here summarising them:
The most common is: “But what about agreements other countries had with the Nazis?”
But we are free to discuss and critically examine them - and no one defends them.
And none contained a secret agreement to brutally conquer sovereign states with the Nazis.
Everyone should be free to discuss the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact and condemn all its horrific consequences, and all the atrocities from Nazis and Soviets.
That’s what the Baltic republics have been doing ever since.
In fact, they declared war on both Nazis & Soviets during that period.
The initial hope was that WW2 would end with independence restored for all sovereign nations.
Baltic people put up their own flags after the Nazis retreated but the advancing Soviets tore those down.
While de facto independence was crushed for another half century of occupation and brutal repressions continued as before, the Baltic republics remained de jure independent under international law and continued campaigning to annul MRP. Here’s a thread on that:
As the Soviet Union desperately tried to prevent its empire collapsing, reforms enabled greater freedom of speech - and Baltic people used that to talk more openly about how they were illegally annexed as a consequence of MRP.
Soviet propaganda labelled independence movements as fascist, but in reality it was galvanised by a total rejection of Nazis and Soviets.
Most notably, the incredible 2 million strong Baltic chain protest was organised on the 50th anniversary of MRP. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baltic_Way
It is thanks to these people that the Baltic republics were finally able to annul the illegal Soviet annexation as a consequence of the Nazi-Soviet pact - and rebuild ourselves as vibrant democratic states, which will always stand up for international law.
We support Ukraine - not just because we don’t want history to repeat here.
We empathise with Ukrainians. We see the same pattern of lies & brutality to deny their right to exist. We see horrors like mass deportations in Ukraine in a way the world doesn’t yet fully understand.
So we will keep sharing our voices from here in the Baltic states to help the world understand our history and the history of nations brutalised by MRP - but also be a voice for our Ukrainian friends too.
🇪🇪 🇱🇻 🇱🇹 🇺🇦 ♥️
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The EU Parliament has declared what has long been obvious: Russia is a terrorist state.
But who were the minority of MEPs who voted against the motion?
Once again, the far right & the far left joined forces to support genocidal imperialism - as is historically traditional. 👇
The concept of left/right politics is based on 18th century French parliamentary seating arrangements.
It should have become clear when the Nazi-Soviet pact was signed that it’s not a particularly useful way to categorise everything in politics.
Extremists (regardless of whether they call themselves right or left) share hateful, undemocratic values & behaviours. They frequently collaborate, as we see again.
Even when they genuinely hate each other, they feed off each other & benefit from polarising society together.
When not factchecking bad takes, we’re part of a volunteer network run by Estonian entrepreneur (& Pipedrive cofounder) @ragnars, which has sent about €2 million of supplies to Ukraine so far.
Here’s an overview of just the vehicles bought & delivered from private donations.
They even have NAFO camo.
The trucks are stuffed with supplies, including about 70 drones sent so far - many of which are the most advanced commercial type available with night vision, which has made a huge difference.
Are you a tankie who needs to justify that awkward Nazi-Soviet alliance that started WW2?
Don’t worry.
We put together this helpful guide based on the best bad takes we’ve seen. 🧵
Firstly, don’t mention the secret protocols!
(The ones in which the Nazis and Soviets agreed to invade and conquer sovereign nations of Europe as part of a mutual imperial plan.)
Sure, it’s the most significant part of the alliance agreement but if you ignore that key part then you can just call the whole thing a non-aggression pact & liken it to agreements that other countries had (even though they didn’t agree to invade other countries with the Nazis).
Some people really don’t like it when people from the Baltic states join their discussions about the Baltic states - and it’s pretty clear why.
Let’s take a look at her arguments. 🧵
First up, she thinks the Baltics are controlled by Commie-Nazis who ruled during the occupations.
Quite original. Vatniks usually say it’s CIA-installed leaders now.
In reality, we’ve moved on from the Soviet occupation era much faster than many global perceptions.
Late Soviet-era Baltic politicians were largely the pro-independence types who gained power during glasnost and led the breakup of the Soviet system. And we’ve moved on from their era. The Baltics today are vibrant multiparty democracies with often very young leaders.
Let’s talk about that “new report” by Amnesty criticising Latvia’s response to human trafficking by the Belarus regime.
🧵…
Firstly - and most oddly - Amnesty made ZERO references to the human trafficking operation as context in its entire 67 page report.
That might be slightly understandable if it said something weasel-ish like: “The circumstances that led to this situation are beyond the scope of this report”.
But they didn’t.
Amnesty repeatedly explained the context as a migration merely framed as hybrid war.
Amnesty released a new report about Latvia that closely resembles Kremlin propaganda narratives, dismissing the Belarus regime’s human trafficking operation and even trying to stoke resentment against Ukrainians who somehow apparently don’t count as ethnic minorities in Latvia.
The Belarus regime has weaponised human suffering and, although there’s no easy response, there is a strong moral argument to closing it down early at the border to prevent more people being tricked into flying to Minsk under false promises.
The Amnesty report makes no reference to the human trafficking operation but merely refers to the hybrid war waged alongside it as if it’s a fabrication by Latvian authorities.