BREAKING: WPATH release statement on NHS Trans health interim service specification for children & young people "An unconscionable degree of state intusion into personal & family medical decision making" with "serious flaws...likely to cause enormous harm" #TransHealthCrisis
WPATH, ASIAPATH, EPATH, PATHA, and USPATH Response to NHS England Statement regarding the Interim Service Specification for the Specialist Service for Children and Young People with Gender Dysphoria (Phase 1 Providers) by NHS England* listloop.com/wpath/mail.cgi…
This is one of the best crafted, and referenced critiques I have ever read. To be issued by the deeply conservative WPATH & by all major international Trans health organisations, demonstrates just how far the NHS has strayed into moral panic over evidenced based Trans healthcare.
It has clear, concise & evidenced debunking of all the moral panic themes of the NHS document - 'persistence', detransition, increasing referral rates, access to blockers & hormones, social Transition. An important document worth reading & reading again. Thank you @wpath.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If a post adolescent Trans young person can give consent, has both support at home and from their medical team, then there should be a route to gender surgeries where that young person wants and understands the treatments involved. I'm very glad WPATH SoC8 gives space for this.
For those who criticise this opinion, I'd reply that other people's medical care is none of your business. That these are personal decisions which are carefully considered by the people best placed to make them. Body autonomy is a human right.
There is a lot of evidence that Trans people delay their education, relationships, jobs. Those who are able to receive the appropriate healthcare for them & at the appropriate time, are able to more quickly reach their transition goals & stop delaying important life milestones.
Reminder that Puberty blockers were first used for trans health in 1988. The adolescents who received them, in the Netherlands, are now in their late 40's & doing great according to decades of follow up studies. This treatment is not experimental it is evidenced best practice.
I've made an effort to build a curated list of research in the last 5 years that supports a Trans affirmative approach to healthcare & education. There are over 100 studies referenced here
"We need more research about Transgender children" is the claim (by those who argue against Trans healthcare).
Well, here's just some of the research that's been carried out in the last 5 years supporting the finding that Trans healthcare is healthcare THREAD: 1/
Mental health and self-worth in socially transitioned transgender youth. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Durwood, L., McLaughlin, K. A., & Olson, K. R. (2017) doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac… 2/
Prepubertal social gender transitions: What we know; what we can learn—A view from a gender affirmative lens. International Journal of Transgender Studies Ehrensaft, D., Giammattei, S. V., Storck, K., Tishelman, A. C., & Keo-Meier, C. (2018). doi.org/10.1080/155327… 3/
The Equality Act 2010 is the main reason why you have heard of Trans children. Before it was in place, there were no protections to allow children who were Transgender to be recognised or protected at school & in society. 1/
While there were legal protections for adults for example in employment & in healthcare, for Trans children & young people, only from 2011 onwards (when the act came into force) were they recognised in the protected characteristic of gender reassignment & legally protected 2/
While there have always been Trans kids, The EA provided a solid foundation of legal protection to recognise the rights & freedoms of Trans children. They could point to statute & say, this is me, you have an obligation & duty not to discriminate against me. 3/
I am the parent of a Trans child & I will not be accused
of homophobia, especially by Ex GIDS psychoanalysts (the 'profession' which industrialised conversion therapy). You clearly no nothing about us, our children or Trans people, you pernicious, moral panic instigating hacks.
The accusations come via testimonies of a now former clinician of GIDS (NHSEngland's Children's Gender Identity Development Service), these were compiled in a report by David Bell & leaked to various newspapers including the Telegraph & Observer. The report's never been published
David Bell is a central figure of the UK's anti Trans movement. He works with Transphobic lobbyists (including as co author of an anti Trans book), he's involved in a legal dispute with GIDs, he has no experience working with Trans youth.
I've asked doctors, in which circumstances would it be medically necessary for our child or parent to disclose her sex assigned at birth when seeking medical help. The specific circumstances are vanishingly small. Enforced disclosure leads to distress & risks harm & prejudice
The one time we disclosed, when unsure, lead to invasive, unnecessary questioning regarding genitalia by NHS staff, entirely unrelated to the purpose of visit. Our daughter's NHS marker states female & we've made decision as a family in future to not disclose unless essential.
Unfortunately this is not a unique experience but so commonplace it has a name Trans Broken Arm Syndrome. Where a trans person seeking medical care for a broken arm will be questioned, on their gender identity & sex characteristics. This prevents trans people accessing vital care