We use money every day, and yet the functioning of our monetary system is still deeply misunderstood.
Without mastering the concept of money, connecting the dots in global macro is impossible.
Let's see how different forms of money impact the economy and markets.
A thread.
1/
There are two main different tiers of money: interbank money and real-economy money.
That's your easy way to think about what operations are (at least short-term) inflationary and which ones are asset-price-inflationary only.
Who prints interbank and real-economy money?
2/
Real-economy money is printed by governments and commercial banks.
If the govt spends more than it plans to collect taxes for, new money has been created.
Government spending (via deficits) increases the net worth of the private sector without adding a liability to it...
3/
...and unless households have to purchase Treasuries issued to fund the deficit spending, they now have more net worth than before.
New money has been created.
A bank making a new loan also literally creates new real-economy money...
4/
...as banks don't lend reserves or existing deposits: as the Bank of England itself shows, when making new loans banks literally credit your account out of nowhere and hence create new deposits.
This is how real-economy money gets created.
Not via QE.
5/
Can you see how this might be short-term inflationary?
Expansion of credit or net govt spending boosts aggregate demand: ceteris paribus and with a small lag, this pushes activity up.
2020-2021 is a prime example: massive credit creation = huge rise in nominal growth!
6/
Increase in govt or private sector credit = increase in the quantity of real-economy money.
Deficit spending (in most cases) adds net worth to the private sector w/o an attached liability, while private sector credit creation (e.g. mortgage) also adds debt to households.
7/
Did you notice how I didn't mention Central Banks yet?
Now let's talk interbank money.
QE is a form to create interbank money: how does that work?
8/
The Central Bank changes the composition of the asset side of the financial institutions' balance sheet: it takes away bonds, and swaps them for reserves.
The interbank system as a whole can't refuse this transaction; there is always a marginal clearing price for QE.
9/
In other words, it's a forceful asset swap: bonds out, reserves in.
Now, the trick is that reserves are NOT money for the private sector: they are money for banks.
Banks don't lend reserves; you can throw as many as you want to them, and it won't change their stance...
10/
...and Japan showed us that in the early 2000s already.
Bank reserves (red) doubled (!) in 5 years as the BoJ went on with QE, and yet bank loans (red) shrank by 25% in the same period.
With double the amount of reserves, banks lent less.
Why?
11/
When lending, banks look at 3 things:
- The creditworthiness of the borrower
- The loan yield they can generate
- The capital they need to put up against the loan
If there is a good trade-off amongst these 3 variables, they lend. Otherwise they don't.
12/
Hence, throwing a bazillion reserves at the banking system doesn't affect much their willingness to lend (i.e. to create new real-economy money).
QE also prints bank reserves, which are not a form of money...
13/
...for the private sector, but only money for banks (i.e. interbank liquidity).
But what if the Central Bank buys from a non-bank?
New ''deposits'' are created: this must be real-economy money, right?
No.
14/
If PIMCO sold bonds to the Fed during QE, PIMCO now has deposits at a bank
PIMCO can't be spent these deposits in the real economy, but can instead be used to purchase financial assets
QE only prints money for the financial sector
Inflationary money is instead...
15/
...mostly represented by bank deposits held by the non-financial private sector and physical cash
Central Banks cannot print real-economy money, but instead they can print interbank money (reserves)
Remember these two tiers of money: real-economy and financial-sector money
16/
But Alf, people can withdraw money from ATMs and banks hence must convert reserves into cash
This way, reserves can reach the real economy!
No
When somebody withdraws from an ATM, it's simply swapping bank deposits for cash: one form of existing real-economy money...
17/
...for another: no new money has been created.
Your checking account goes down in $$$ by the very exact amount of the physical cash you withdraw from an ATM.
Reserves DO NOT enter the real-economy.
18/
20 years of QE didn't generate inflation because...well, QE is not inflationary
Credit creation instead boosts aggregate demand and it can lead to inflationary pressures
That's exactly what we have seen in 2020-2021: massive fiscal deficits & govt-sponsored bank lending...
19/
...ended up overheating the economy with super strong real GDP growth and inflationary pressures on top.
That real-economy money is NOT printed by Central Banks.
They instead print interbank money (reserves).
Don't mix different tiers of money up.
20/
Finally, a reminder that premium content (including interactive macro tools) will soon be available & require a paid subscription.
If you subscribe before Nov 30 you get some pretty hefty discounts - feel free to have a look here!
Let's refresh some of my forward-looking indicators to answer this pressing question.
A thread.
1/
First of all: shall we agree on what characterizes a recession in the first place?
While many refer to 2 consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth as the main signal for a recession, the US National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) instead looks at a wide array...
2/
...of real economic activity and precisely: real personal income and expenditures, employment, inflation-adjusted retail sales, and industrial production/corporate profits
In other words: it focuses on consumers, the labor market and corporate activity
As explained on TMC, there are technical reasons why this rally might extend into year-end.
But please contextualize.
Assuming earnings grow 5% in 2023 (brave...), buying the SPX at 4200 means investing at 18x P/E.
That's a 5.5% earnings yield.
With risk-free rates at 4-5%.
The air becomes pretty think above 4150 really
If you want lower rates, that could happen but it's also very likely to be accompanied by a serious labor market and earnings cliff
If you want higher earnings, that could also happen but the Fed is going to hike more as a result
My last trade on equities was a short on Russell 2000 future entered on Aug 15 (entry at 2,015) to fade the July bear market rally and leverage on further cyclical growth slowdown.
Here we are again: left to assess whether we are looking at a bear market rally or a sustainable turning point for the stock market.
Last week’s softer than expected inflation print spurred a massive rally across asset classes.
2/
The magnitude of the market reaction was exacerbated by technical reasons we will discuss, but to assess medium-term implications we need to break down the CPI report and take a broader look at the global macro puzzle.
For years, I was blessed with the opportunity to run a $20 billion multi-asset institutional portfolio.
And yet, something didn’t feel right.
The amount of information, data, and knowledge available to financial institutions is unparalleled.
Yet...
2/
...it's strictly reserved to that group of people, leaving common investors with a big gap to fill.
I never liked that.
That's also why in December 2021 I took a massive, scary leap of faith - I left the industry and started sharing my insights with you here on FinTwit...
3/