So...I saw a post earlier today from someone saying that they deleted a thread about the #Achord mess because there has already been 'enough damage done' to him and his career.
I disagree, and here's why. A thread:
This isn't about damaging Achord himself. I feel awful - & we all should - for his wife and children, as well as all the people at Sequitur Academy. Many of them are truly innocent victims of this. Some of them are not.
However, some of them had to be aware but said nothing.
Furthermore, Achord was on a podcast w/ Stephen Wolfe, who is being platformed & presented as THE major voice for the Christian Nationalist Movement. Canon Press has already said they won't bend to public pressure, nor should we expect them to. They knew this & published anyway.
The reason so many people are freaking out about Achord - people like Jeff Wright, Joel Ascol, Stephen Wolfe & William E. Wolfe among others - is b/c there is a whole network of friends and people who foster his worldview.
THOSE people need to be exposed as well.
And all of those people, plus more, pushed back hard alleging that there is no such thing as systemic injustice, that 'feminism' is akin to the reporting of criminal sexual assault, and that legitimate hostility to criminal actions done IN THE CHURCH is 'woke'.
Paul tells us in Ephesians that we are to 'expose' the evil deeds of darkness (5:11).
That means exposing ALL of the moral rot AND ALL of those who shelter or enable it.
This isn't about Achord. This is about their ideas & the way it is perpetuated in evang. circles.
And every single time Christians "let the matter drop" b/c they've "suffered so much", the network of these guys brush it quietly to the side, insist that there's nothing to see here, and that it's really no big deal. Doug Wilson has done this for literally decades.
These guys want to remake the nation into their image, and Achord was only one of many that actually, explicitly, clearly laid out what they want. The fact that Achord and Stephen Wolfe were close enough to host a podcast together is a problem.
The defensive strategy is to maintain Stephen Wolfe's credibility & influence but disassociate from Achord himself.
What they will do is quietly (or not so quietly - buy Wolfe's book!) support Achord, help him rehab his image, provide his family w/ funds, and perpetuate it.
So it is imperative that we put these people on the spot, make them defend their networks & then reject them from Christian circles if they refuse.
This is how churches, denominations & associations are corrupted by evil. But that only happens if we go along with it.
Yet another observation - don't miss the correlation between sexual lust of a teacher towards a student in his charge. This angle isn't getting the publicity it should.
A word to the survivor community given all the toxicity I've seen on Twitter over the last two days or so, both from movies:
"Be careful which path you travel down, Strange. Stronger men than you have lost their way." - Wong, Doctor Strange
"You have allowed this [darkness] to twist your mind, until now, until now you've become the very thing you swore to destroy." - Obi-Wan, Revenge of the Sith
Here's a bonus quote I found while looking for the latter one:
"The dark is generous, and it is patient. It is the dark that seeds cruelty into justice, that drips contempt into compassion, that poisons love with grains of doubt...
"Southern Baptists have always been cooperative in their spirit and are more than willing to help while we detest __as they detest sexual abuse of children or anyone__...
...it is a problem and the Catholic church brought it to light many years ago __and agree that there are some things that happen in Baptist churches that are swept under the rug and should not be.__"
- Bylaws Workgroup, Administrative Subcommittee of the EC of the SBC, Feb. 2007
The fight about waiving #SBC A/C privilege was always about protecting the men at the top from the ramifications of their immoral __ AND ILLEGAL__ activities.
A cursory review of the #SATFReport makes it plain as day.
If the reviewer can't even spell the author's name right, don't waste your time on the review.
The least thing you can do is copy and paste the name so that it's correct, even IF said is the worst book out there and contains all the heresy in it. 1/5
So on a whim, I read a book by Nadia Bolz-Weber a few weeks ago ("Shameless", for those who are curious), and I did it because a certain heretic kept putting her on blast. I don't read stuff I disagree with often, but in this case I wanted to see what the ruckus was about. 2/5
Nadia and I would disagree on a LOT, but I think she's a terrific writer and there are definitely things that she points out that I needed to think on, even if we still disagree. The other thing I took away from her book is that she LOVES her churchgoers. 3/5
3. Not only are Ligon and John tight as friends, but their business models are also intertwined as well. Ligonier advertises at #ShepCon & vice versa...."A rising tide lifts all boats." Many of the fanatical "Mac"olytes move freely between the 2 & buy resources from both.
4. The real issue here is a culture, unfortunately NOT specific to John/@GraceComChurch, is that John (or another elder) is the king of an religious business empire where nobody holds him actually accountable. Same with @Phil_Johnson_. @ModernDayZorro has several examples.
Going to retweet some of the New Yorker article with parts that stuck out to me as it illustrates why I started questioning complementarianism and eventually decided this whole debate is fit only for the trash can.
This will be a thread, and probably a long one. 01/?
"For a time, Barr fell under the sway of an abusive boyfriend, who, while menacing her, spat Scripture demanding her submission. The fact that she couldn’t question him made it harder to see the abuse for what it was."
02/?
The first time I ever felt called on to use counseling training was when a young woman I worked with confided in me that her then-boyfriend was mentally, verbally, and socially cruel to her. Neither were saved, but I realized "complementarianism" had no category for this. 03/?