#Latinxrevisionism
Some people ask, "How could everybody be lying?" Well, we've seen something like this before. Not long ago a lot of people deluded themselves into believing that the Irish had been slaves and claimed it was all forgotten or ignored.
The myth of Mexican/Latino segregation is Texas history in identical to the Irish slavery myth but bigger.
This is not something that officially happened in Texas. Segregation had nothing to do with Mexicans, but they say that it was all happening "as a social custom". They show the same two signs over and over and say "these were signs everywhere!".
They use terms loosely. The Irish slavery believers invented Irish Slavery by claiming that Indentured servitude was "slavery". In a similar manner, they invent Mexican segregation by claiming that ESL education that was part of the white school system was "racial segregation".
Or there was different dances for Mexicans at the white schools. That was "segregation".
They pretend that a Mexican neighborhood was a "segregated neighborhood", even though they were never legally forced into those neighborhoods. These were just ethnic communities who chose to live around each other - just like there were Polish communities in TX.
Meanwhile, Texans who grew up during segregation are still living. And they didn't know that Mexicans were segregated. Anglos remember always going to school with Mexicans in the 50s.
The myth of Mexican segregation is an attempt to fundamentally rewrite Texas history.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#LatinxRevisionism on KPBS.
Andrea Guerrero, an immigrant rights activist, went on TV and made up a bunch of stories, claiming that Latinos were subject to "white only" Jim Crow Laws, and attempts to write them into the civil rights narrative.
#AffirmativeAction
Remember: The "hispanic" minority group was politically fabricated for the purpose of AA. The label artificially made "people of Spanish origin" into official minorities so that they could masquerade as POC and get preferences that were never intended for them.
This is what Mexican political groups wanted when they fought for this new designation. The thought of a "hispanic" minority group would not exist today if it were not for the 1964 civil rights act and Affirmative Action. forgottenlatinohistory.blogspot.com/2021/06/she-ma…
All arguments in favor of AA fall short when it comes to the mystical "hispanic" minority group. Why should "Latinos" qualify for Affirmative Action in higher education if Latin American people were NEVER historically excluded from higher education in American history?
How did segregation on buses work? Colored people normally had to sit in the back, but if the bus was full, whites got the seats in the back and colored people had to stand. This Mexican woman was a white lady that "never had any problems".
via @YouTube
A common complaint "Lah-tee-nos" make is that the white-black story of segregation and civil rights ignores them. No, it does not! The way to be inclusive is to explain to Latino children that they are part of the white-black story.
"Latinos" were here in the Jim Crow era, but they were on the white side of the color line.
The series "A League of their own" is stirring up discussion of "Latinos" and race in the Jim Crow era. The AAGPBL was racially segregated - but had Latin American players. Some are starting to explain that by claiming that they were "white-passing". autostraddle.com/a-league-of-th…
The use of the term "white-passing" to describe white people from Latin countries is problematic. It pretends that they were POC who pretended to be white. In the 40s, Latin Americans were normally considered white. They didn't have to "pass" for anything.
The history of "passing for white" in the U.S is Black-American history and actually has nothing to do with "Latinos". Claiming that "Latin" people were passing for white serves to mask the inherent white privileges that they had at the time.
After the 2014 book "Making Hispanics", more people are finally starting to acknowledge that this happened. But it's too often reduced to a story about choosing a term. "Hispanic" wasn't a semantic change, it was inventing a NEW minority group in the 80s. history.com/news/hispanic-…
Political groups just arbitrarily decided one day that Mexicans and everybody who speaks Spanish were a separate minority group apart from whites and blacks. It was considered a ridiculous concept when it was introduced and took 20 years to normalize.
It wasn't a different choice of words like the difference between "black/colored/negro/African-American". It never crossed anybody's mind that Spanish speakers were a separate minority group before the invention of the "hispanic".
#HuelgaSchool
When desegregation happened, white students were bussed to black schools and vice versa. Here's a story about Anglo-American white kids who were being bussed to Pinkston high-school in Dallas.
When Mexican kids started to be bussed to black schools as white - they broke out in protest, boycotted integration, and put their kids in homeschools (so -called "freedom schools"). nytimes.com/1970/09/06/arc…
The Huelga School story alleged that only Mexicans were being bussed to black schools, and not Anglos. They claim Mexicans were being specifically targeted for integration with blacks. That was never true. Anglos were bussed to black schools as well.