#Query
Caselaws which say that scope of Section 37 Arbitration Act is very narrow and limited like Section 34
#Analysis
Since S 37 is an appeal against the order passed in S 34 proceedings, it goes without saying that the scope of S 37 cannot be wider than S 34.
Caselaws which say that scope of Section 37 Arbitration Act is very narrow and limited like Section 34
#Analysis
Since S 37 is an appeal against the order passed in S 34 proceedings, it goes without saying that the scope of S 37 cannot be wider than S 34.
In fact, the Delhi HC in Movie Times Cineplex Pvt Ltd vs MRG Developers Pvt Ltd livelaw.in/pdf_upload/mug… held that the scope of judicial scrutiny and interference by an appellate court
under Section 37 is even more restricted, than while deciding a
petition under Section 34
under Section 37 is even more restricted, than while deciding a
petition under Section 34
Delhi HC (DB) has also observed that under Section 37 , the extent of judicial scrutiny and scope of interference is further narrower (than Section 34) 202(2013) DLT 218 Jhang Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd vs Pt. Munshi Ram And Associates Pvt Ltd. indiankanoon.org/doc/174393399/
In UHL Power Company Ltd. vs State Of Himachal Pradesh (2022) 4 SCC 116 , the Supreme Court has also held the same regarding scope of Section 37 Arbitration Act indiankanoon.org/doc/146677273/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
