Federal public defender convincingly argues that the FBI used an unprecedented "modern-day general warrant" to seize personal data of anyone who "could have been" in the approximate vicinity of the Capitol on Jan 6. "Defending democracy" by obliterating bedrock civil liberties
The warrant was "fatally over-broad and devoid of particularity, and therefore impermissible under the Fourth Amendment." There was never any particularized probable cause cited by FBI -- making it certain that searches were conducted on people who committed no crime whatsoever
Rather than establishing any basis for probable cause that subjects of the search had committed a crime, the government relied on hypothesis and conjecture that merely "equated presence at the Capitol with criminal activity" -- bizarrely invoking "the pandemic" in its reasoning
In other words, to obtain its general warrant and seize the personal data of thousands of people without establishing any particularized probable cause that they had engaged in criminal activity, the government simply "equated presence to criminality"
But because this Jan 6 investigation is the most important in the history of human civilization or something, and Democracy™ as we know it hangs in the balance, expect these brazen, precedent-setting abrogations of the Fourth Amendment to be largely ignored -- or cheered
Rebecca Fish -- Assistant Federal Public Defender in Tacoma, WA -- did an excellent, thorough job on this motion. Well worth reading documentcloud.org/documents/2316…
As recently as November 3, a brand new Jan 6 defendant was arrested. FBI agent writes that he/she attempted to use the same "geofence warrant" (general warrant) to establish this suspect's criminality, but failed. Then tried facial recognition software, and failed. But pressed on
The suspect's criminal conduct is alleged to be that he walked into the Capitol at 2:50pm, took a selfie with his wife (who was also arrested), and then walked out at 3:00pm. These were the fruits of an extensive investigation by an agent in the FBI's "Joint Terrorism Task Force"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Trump's former and likely future National Security Advisor, Robert O'Brien, wrote an essay intellectualizing Trump's foreign policy. He says Trump defies "globalist orthodoxies" by strengthening NATO and increasing US military entanglements with Japan, Israel, and the Gulf states
O'Brien pines for Trump to correct the mistakes of Biden, who he says has not militarized Taiwan quickly enough. The next Administration must push Taiwan to expand conscription, and also start treating Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam like client states on par with Israel
O'Brien can't wait for Trump to resume his "Maximum Pressure" campaign against Iran, which Biden has largely continued but not aggressively enough for O'Brien. These means ramping up sanctions with the aim of "containing" Iran (and ultimately overthrowing its government)
Just read the memoir of Spiro "Ted" Agnew, who resigned as Vice President in 1973. Lots of background intrigue I hadn't been familiar with. In particular he alleges that Gen. Al Haig, Nixon's chief of staff, threatened to get "nasty and dirty" with him if he didn't resign, which Nixon (erroneously) believed would take the pressure off *him* for Watergate. Agnew inferred Haig's statement to be a potential threat of assassination. He felt he was betrayed by Nixon, and even in their retirements would not accept Nixon's phone calls. Agnew was an unexpectedly talented writer, and also wrote a best-selling novel
Agnew makes a pretty persuasive case that he was politically targeted by vindictive DOJ prosecutors with various interlocking political agendas who wanted to "get him" for petty graft related to his tenure as Governor of Maryland. The story is rather convoluted, but essentially Agnew was accused of taking "kickbacks" through engineering projects he doled out to state contractors. But he fairly convincingly establishes (through documentary evidence he obtained years after the fact) that there was never any solid corroboration for the allegations, which were pried out of desperate witnesses who had been subjected to wildly strong-arm tactics by the US Attorney's Office in Maryland and Washington DOJ
Agnew eventually agreed to resign "in the national interest" and plead "nolo contendere" to a downgraded income tax charge. He was on the verge of an indictment, and arguments that the Vice President could not be indicted in office had failed to gain traction
He felt especially betrayed because Nixon would tepidly defend him in public, while working behind the scenes to sandbag him through aides and surrogates. Agnew says his wife was even threatened with prosecution
One thing I didn't realize was that Agnew arranged a meeting with the Speaker of the House, Carl Albert, whom Agnew respected despite Albert being a Democrat, and appealed to him to hold House hearings on the allegations because he insisted any judicial proceedings in Maryland had been tainted by media leaks. Agnew cited the precedent of Vice President John Calhoun in 1826. Nixon underhandedly signaled his disapproval of this tactic, so it never happened and Agnew resigned
Agnew complains that he was essentially disappeared afterwards. Frank Sinatra gave him a $200,000 loan after he left office to handle his legal and living expenses -- Agnew claims he would've been destitute otherwise
Agnew also claimed that the outbreak of the Yom Kippur war on October 6, 1973 accelerated the urgency with which he was being forced out of the Vice Presidency. This was communicated to him by Attorney General Elliot Richardson, he said. With the idea being that Nixon's potential successor, in the event that he's forced to resign himself, must be just as ardently supportive of Israel as Nixon had been, and there were questions about Agnew's devotion on that score. Agnew resigned on October 10
WTF? The Arizona man accused of plotting a mass shooting at a rap concert to incite "race war" ahead of the 2024 election claimed to have "fought as a mercenary in Ukraine and killed Russian soldiers," according to the FBI affidavit. (He spoke to an FBI informant at gun shows)
The man allegedly tried to recruit his FBI informant friend, as well as an undercover FBI agent he had just met at the gun show, to drive cross country to Atlanta to commit the mass shooting. His goal was to ensure that "every whitey will be the enemy across the whole country"
The man allegedly said that he wanted to make it clear that the concert shooting was not gang-related, so his three-man shooter squad should make sure to shout things like "whites out here killing," "KKK all the way," and "black lives don't matter, white lives matter"
The new TIME interview with Biden is an utter disaster. Here is a thread with the soul-crushing lowlights
First, Biden repeats the common Democratic folklore that Trump wants to "abandon" US alliances, and in particular wants to "eviscerate" NATO. At this point, this is just pure mind-melting myth. Trump brags to this VERY DAY about how he secured additional spending commitments from NATO member states.
It makes zero sense for Trump to "eviscerate" NATO, a key tool of American hegemonic power, which Trump bombastically pledges to maintain and expand.
Absolutely nothing from the actual record of the Trump Administration reflects doing anything to substantively undermine NATO. Rather, the opposite: He literally signed off on two rounds of NATO expansion, and he elevated Ukraine into a NATO subsidiary status. He increased the funding of the Pentagon funding vehicle for US troops in Europe. He set up new military garrisons in Poland.
Trump even recently posted an endorsement of his pro-NATO stance from the NATO secretary-general, Jens Stoltenberg.
This is so disastrous because it perpetuates the political dynamic whereby Trump is given incentive to further demonstrate how steadfastly supportive he is of NATO, to refute this never-ending myth.
Biden also sets up the contrast with Trump where Biden's foreign policy vision is supposedly "values-based," whereas Trump is based on... something else. "Values" are code for "messianic liberal interventionist ideals that never hold up to basic tests of constituency or efficacy"
Please Watch! In July 2023, Trump hosted an "Israel Heritage Foundation" gala at his Bedminster estate. Rabbi David Katz proclaimed the Third Holy Temple will be re-built in Jerusalem "very soon," thanks to the heroic efforts of Trump. Trump then recited a Blessing from "Hashem"
One of the main missions of the "Israel Heritage Foundation" group is to advocate for Israeli "sovereignty" in what they refer to as "Judea and Samaria," which translates to full US-backed Israeli annexation and absorption of the West Bank
The "Israel Heritage Foundation" just can't stop showering Trump with all its most prestigious honors and awards. In July 2023, it was the Keter Yerushalayim (Crown of Jerusalem.) Then in February 2024, it was the Silver Menorah proclaiming Trump to be Israel's "Prince of Peace"
Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) and Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY) organized a letter to Columbia today demanding the "anti-Jewish" protest be disbanded immediately due to "hate speech"
"The time for negotiation is over," they warn. These people are absolute menaces to the First Amendment
Note, the 21 House Dems who signed the letter are not narrowly objecting to the encampment. They are explicitly denouncing the political speech being expressed there, which they claim is intolerably "anti-Semitic" and therefore creating an "unsafe environment" for Jewish students
Rarely will you see such a blatant and unapologetic intrusion by top government officials to crush political speech openly on the basis of their objection to the content of that speech, but this little Congressional crew have clearly discarded any remaining sense of shame