Alexander Profile picture
Dec 1, 2022 25 tweets 6 min read Read on X
The biggest status-enhancing and status-decreasing behaviors.

Evolutionary psychology of status and status sex differences.

Cross-cultural findings across 14 nations. 🧵
Previous chart are combined items for men and women, the highs and lows out of 240 items.

Sex differences in status-enhancing behavior are remarkably small. Basically what enhances status for men also seems to enhance status for women.
If you go back to the first chart, it's basically a list of prosocial behavior for what is status enhancing and antisocial behavior for what is status diminishing.
"In summary, many status criteria are not sex-differentiated and appear to have similar effects across nations sampled in our study, suggesting possible universality."
Here are the larger sex differences that occurred in the exploratory analysis. Note that most of these are still small and share the same direction: what increases the status of a man also increases a woman's status.
An exception: having a younger mate was associated with higher male status, while having a younger mate was associated with lower status for women.
A few more:

Having a higher status mate increases women's status.

Women's status is more damaged by having a poor mate.

Being a virgin lowers male status, but is beneficial to female status.

Sex before marriage lowers a woman's status; no effect on men.
At d = -.78 and .81, some of these previous items have what are conventionally considered to be large effects by the way.
Drug use harms men's status, but less than it harms women's status.

Being able to drink more alcohol is a slight status boost for men, but harms women's status.
Crying in front of your friends hurts male status more.
"Acting masculine" and "acting feminine" were the largest sex differentiated status cues for men and women.

Masc men = high status / fem men = low status

Fem women = high status / masc women = low status
"They [acting masculine and feminine] appear to have profound status consequences, and because they show the largest sex-differentiated status consequences in the entire 14-nation study."
Important for men and women:

"Being healthy, having strong kin alliances, and embodying characteristics generally valuable across relationship domains—such as trustworthiness, willingness to share resources with others, and having a wide range of knowledge."
Failing to retaliate to insults lowers male status. Consistent with Nisbett's observations of a violent honor culture within male groups.
There weren't sex differences in some of the major expected status signals. Seems to have surprised Buss et al in the results.

Basically all of the resource acquisition abilities or traits.
"After all, any person who could reliably access resources would be valuable across many do­mains—regardless of their sex. Considering these findings, this hypothesis should be revised."
Having a faithful mate or forgiving infidelity wasn't associated with sex differences in status.
"We are not denying that culture can either amplify or diminish the magnitude of such sex differences...

... however, positing that these sex differences are rooted in evolutionary processes can explain the fact that such differences appear to be culturally universal."
Let's look at the initial chart again. The big status helpers and status hurters. As mentioned, basically lists of prosocial versus antisocial behavior.
Education occurs twice in the top list. Both for having a prestigious school, as well as for having a college degree.

As I have said many times on here and in my videos, getting an education is one of the best things you can do to increase your status in Western culture.
Note how many status cues are directly related to the collective or the group as well. Being an isolated loner sigma individualist doesn't seem to help.

Status comes down to your interactions with those around you.
Many of the status cues, both in the chart and in the results that I shared, are actually quite intuitive. They are things that we tend to know from experience that are associated with status. Making money, having a good job, being trusted, etc.
This makes sense, because when you think about it status is a group feature. An isolated man on an island has no status. Ultimately, it is other people in the society around you who determine what your status is.
Look at how big an effect "bad manners" had on status. Something you might think of as entirely inconsequential.

Reduction of 2.6 points on an 8 point scale.

How to immediately raise your status 25%:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alexander

Alexander Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @datepsych

Nov 19, 2023
Fat women are perceived as less attractive and less feminine, and subsequently receive less benevolent sexism. Image
From this paper: Image
Also true for older women and Black women: Image
Read 5 tweets
Oct 13, 2023
I rarely comment on the “bad dating behavior” vid genre, but this one is worth seeing.

The affective shift between video part 1 and part 2 is remarkable. He calmly tells her he will just drive her home (after she refuses to leave the car because she doesn’t like the restaurant).
There is a lot of discourse on “entitlement” and “delusion” that I think is driven by these viral videos.

Understandable - it’s behavior that is entitled and delusional.

The behavior of a spoiled child.
Read 18 tweets
Oct 6, 2023
As an undergraduate I remember learning that peer review was the litmus test for reputable, good science. It was this iron-clad thing. The ultimate seal of approval that lets you know if a paper is trustworthy.

But we were never taught what peer review actually consists of. 🧵
I suspect this is the case for most people: everyone learns that it’s really important, but not how the process works.

They imagine peer review as this well-oiled machine - rigorously vetting your methods and results - combing through your data to make sure it checks out.
Here is an illustration of the peer review process from Taylor & Francis.

At its core it’s a feedback system: 2-3 anonymous reviewers (other people in your field) read your paper and provide feedback. Image
Read 19 tweets
Oct 5, 2023
Underlying this is an inaccurate mental model of the romantic landscape: the belief that physical attraction doesn’t (or shouldn’t) have any impact on your relationship.

It does, though. If you make major improvements to your appearance then your partner may like you more.
Usually we see the opposite: people “let themselves go” in relationships and see a concurrent decline in sexual activity and relationship satisfaction.
“I look better and my husband is more attracted to me” isn’t exactly a bad problem to have, but some people will make a problem out of anything.
Read 7 tweets
Oct 1, 2023
We tend to think of passionate love as giving way to committed love with relationship duration. Basically, passion fades with time, but commitment remains (or grows).

However, passionate love may become increasingly important for relationship satisfaction in LTRs and marriage. Image
This model of love - Sternberg’s triangular theory of passion, intimacy, and commitment - can explain a large degree of variance in relationship satisfaction. Image
Similar in the results from this paper: Image
Read 19 tweets
Sep 28, 2023
The average relationship length beginning at age 18 is about two years. This increases with age; the older the cohort, the longer the relationship. 🧵
What factors predict having a long string of short duration relationships?

1. Personality disorders and poor mental health.

2. Substance abuse.

3. Higher orientation toward short term relationships (indiv diffs in sociosexuality).
This seems to be heritable and related to “pair bonding.” Infidelity, promiscuity, and relationship failure are all heritable. Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(