In future history books, the chapter explaining America’s descent into complete dysfunction might as well end with the sentence “But senators Manchin and Sinema wouldn’t do it, because they considered it ‘partisan.’”
(Please note that the chapter title should be reserved for the Republican Party, to leave no doubt who is chiefly responsible for this mess. But the chapter should ask: “Was there nothing else that could have been done?” That’s where Sinema and Manchin come in. #bipartisanship)
When I talk to an international (mostly German) audience, the concern over how the domestic situation in the U.S. is going to affect the rest of the world is often directed at scenarios like “What if Trump becomes president again and leaves NATO.” But it’s not just Trump.
To me, a more immediate concern is the dysfunction, paralysis, and turmoil that is likely to define the foreseeable future: A country entirely consumed by the domestic political conflict, falling apart, with a radicalizing GOP in position to make functional governance impossible.
America is too big and powerful - politically, economically, militarily - for this not to affect every aspect of international relations, for it not to significantly hamper any attempt to solve the most urgent collective action problems on a global scale. That’s frightening.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas Zimmer

Thomas Zimmer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tzimmer_history

Nov 29
Democracy Faces a Reactionary Counter-Mobilization Against Egalitarian Multiracial Pluralism
 
I wrote about what we are up against, and the terms that best capture the nature and the end goals of the radicalizing assault on democracy: thomaszimmer.substack.com/p/democracy-fa…
A reactionary counter-mobilization against egalitarian multiracial, pluralistic democracy.
 
That is the formulation I have been using to describe what is happening on the Right (and beyond), to capture what is animating conservative politics.
I think it’s worth reflecting on each of these terms:

- Reactionary – rather than conservative
- Counter-mobilization – rather than backlash
- Egalitarian multiracial, pluralistic democracy – rather than just: democracy
Read 26 tweets
Nov 28
My critique of the reactionary centrist punditry has brought out some relatively big accounts against me. I’ve decided to block several of them. Not simply because of their attacks, but because they are sending an avalanche of aggressive abuse from their followers/fans my way.
While I don’t think anything that these people say here is a fair representation of my argument or rises to the level of smart, substantive critique, this is not something I would normally block. But if you have amassed a toxic following ready to jump on people, that’s on you.
I’m not sure why some people attract more of that kind of toxic following than others. It’s not just about the number of followers. Hamid has a lot of followers, Yglesias has a huge platform. But that’s never caused much of a problem in my replies. And so I have not blocked them.
Read 6 tweets
Nov 28
ICYMI over the long weekend: On the latest “Is This Democracy,” @LilyMasonPhD, @perrybaconjr, and I talk about the rogue Supreme Court – The Club Q shooting in the context of the conservative demonization of vulnerable groups – How (not) to discuss politics over the holidays.
In this episode of @USDemocracyPod: Conservative justices are leaking decisions, but more importantly, they have made the Supreme Court the spearhead of a reactionary counter-mobilization against democracy – simply preserving “trust in the institution” won’t cut it.
We also discuss the assault on the LGBTQ community in Colorado Springs: America’s gun cult(ure), the escalating rightwing demonization of vulnerable groups, and why the reactions to the latest shooting are indicative of a significant radicalization of conservative politics.
Read 5 tweets
Nov 25
New episode of Is This Democracy:
 
@LilyMasonPhD, @perrybaconjr, and I discuss the rogue Supreme Court – Violent rightwing extremism as a consequence of the conservative demonization of vulnerable groups – How (not) to talk politics over Thanksgiving podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/is-…
In this episode of @USDemocracyPod: Conservative justices are leaking decisions, but more importantly, they have made the Supreme Court the spearhead of a reactionary counter-mobilization against democracy – which is why simply preserving “trust in the institution” won’t cut it.
We also discuss the assault on the LGBTQ community in Colorado Springs: America’s gun cult(ure), the escalating rightwing demonization of vulnerable groups, and why the reactions to the latest shooting are indicative of a significant radicalization of conservative politics.
Read 5 tweets
Nov 24
Imagine looking at the path Republicans have taken *since* 2015 and thinking: “You know what we need more of? Both-sides false equivalence!”

It’s a proper “Tell me who you really are” moment from one of the high priests of white dude (increasingly reactionary) centrism. Image
As is often the case with Silver, and so typical of the white male reactionary centrist pundit brotherhood, what is presented here as bold out-of-the-box truth-telling is little more than silly contrarianism in style and well in line with white elite orthodoxy in substance.
Silver is a key figure in a group of ostensibly liberal pundits who have become widely revered apostles of centrist realignment in American politics. Almost all of them are white men in their late 30s to mid-40s - Silver, Yglesias, Barro, Mounk…
Read 28 tweets
Nov 23
How much democracy, and for whom?
 
That’s the focus of my new newsletter: A reflection on democracy and its discontents, past and present – on the ongoing conflict over how much democracy, and for whom, there should be in America thomaszimmer.substack.com
The conflict between those who wanted to restrict democracy, make sure it would never undermine the “natural” white Christian patriarchal order, and those who envisioned a truly egalitarian multiracial pluralistic democracy has always defined the American experiment.
This conflict over democracy has always been a struggle over national identity – over what defines America, over who gets to set the boundaries of who/what qualifies as American. For some, the nation was supposed to be defined by an idea: “all men are created equal.”
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(