C🅰️tSE Profile picture
Dec 1, 2022 12 tweets 8 min read Read on X
A small thread 🐾🧶🐈‍⬛ on choice of orbital inclination.

We learned in two previous business calls $ASTS plans to launch 5 BlueBird block1 satellites on a single launch.

B. Riley update today tells us that it is
likely a 22° inclined orbit.

Lets figure why that might be?

1/n Image
BlueBird block 1, BBb1, are same size as BlueWalker3, BW3, that is currently in orbit.

Size is 1288x1288x~1650 mm shape is like a cube, and BW3 was packed inside an even larger barrel shaped ”LVA”, Launch Vehicle Adptor.

Weight assumed to be approx 1500 kg each.

2/n ImageImageImage
Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy fairings comes in two sizes. The extended version has room for a central pillar of LVA diameter (~1900) that is some ~ 15.5 meters high.

Plenty of space for 5 LVAs on top of eachother. Close to 3 meters vertical space each. 2–2.5 needed.

3/n ImageImageImageImage
When launching it is best due east as you get help from earth rotation.

But if the launch site is not on the equator then the lowest inclination You can launch directly to equals the latitude.

You reach that lowest inclination by launching directly east (or west).

4/n Image
As the Eastern Range is on 28.5 degrees latitude launching to the lowest inclination possible means 28.5 degrees inclination.

Western Range (Vandenberg) is no better for low inclinations.

And so due east (azimuth 90) results in 28.5 degrees inclined orbit.

5/n ImageImageImage
That is the closest SpaceX gets to equatorial (0 inclination) without maling a dogleg maneuver. A course correction mid flight.

The problem is. Dogleg costs Delta V.
It costs a lot of power.

To the level 5 BBb1s can not reach equatorial from Eastern range on single Falcon.
6/n Image
Getting such a heavy payload ~7500+ kg (10,000+ kg with LVAs ?)

Is not possible with such a sharp turn /dogleg.

Unless you use a Falcon Heavy. Which is a Falcon9 with a couple of extra Falcon9 first stages strapped to it.

Then barely possible. And maybe 3-4 not 5.

7/n ImageImageImage
Equatorial (0 inclination) requires only 18 BlueBird block 2 to give continous coverage. But will be cheaper to populate using Starship with a lot of cheap excess power.

But there might be a better solution still. A compromise of sorts. Or an optimization.

8/n ImageImageImage
Making a smaller dogleg from 28.5 optimal launch inclination to 22 requires less power.

While a constellation at 22 degrees is using a trajectory quite close to the equator. And thus becomes more dense than if launched like BlueWalker3 to 53.2 degrees.

9/n ImageImageImage
The power requirement is so much lower a standard Falcon 9 is sufficient.

Possibly with reusable first stage ocran recovery. No Falcon Heavy needed for 22 degrees.

But benefits do not stop there with cheaper launch.

10/n ImageImage
7 countries (Kenya and Nigeria among them) are regulatory good to go. Because $ASTS partners have Universal License for their spectrum there.

The diamond in that crown is India. Where $ASTS partner Vodafone holds UL in the whole country.

All are covered by 22° but not 0°

11/n Image
BlueWalker3 is currently testing the entire FirstNet broadband spectrum. A network dedicated for First Responders.

22 degrees would create intermittent coverage in a region prone to earth quakes, hurricanes, wildfires, desert heat and such in the south of continental USA.

12/12 Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with C🅰️tSE

C🅰️tSE Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CatSE___ApeX___

Apr 11
🚨STARLINK DRAINS BATTERY 🚨

Why the Starlink 🪫 d2c earth moving cells are a really bad design choice can fill a book.

Carrying around an app that rapidly drains your battery in a disaster scenario isn’t optimal.

1/n
I’d like to focus not on how these rapid-fire beam to beam handovers causes dropped texts. Not on how that type of beams cause more border interference. Etc.

But on battery.

Starlink 🪫 d2c does not like
AST 🔋SpaceMobile fix the beam onto you with adaptive beamforming.

2/ Image
Starlink 🪫 d2c does just shines their beams down in a static fixed manner and as the satellites traverse the sky you are in a whole set of beams that hand over to eachother,

It does not track you.

3/
Read 6 tweets
Mar 8
🚨FCC WAIVER IMPLICATIONS🚨

📓DEEPDIVE DD EXPLAINED 👨🏼‍💻

Let’s start:

The way you can differentiate emmissions in space [where] and in time [when] and in strength [how much] you can also differentiate in the frequenzy domain [which channel].

That you transmit in.

🧶🐈‍⬛

1/n
The transmissions are ”good signals” if they’re [when], [where], [as strong] and [which channel] combo that is needed to do the transmission that is sought for.

Another combo is ”a waste”.

But some other combos also do harm.
”Bad signal”

2/n
This is a result showing AST SpaceMobile technology to maximize the signal to which channel it is wanted in (blue) ”good signal” while minimizing it elsewhere, which is adjacent channels. (Green). ”Bad signal”

This is industry excellence.

3/n Image
Read 15 tweets
Feb 15
🚨SPACEMOBILE $ASTS FULL FCC GRANT FOR 🇺🇸 BLOCK 1 β-TESTS🚨

✅$ASTS REGULATORY READINESS NOW ON PAR WITH STARLINK D2C

✅$ASTS TECHNOLOGICAL READINEDS WAY BETTER,

⏳ WHICH IS ABOUT TO BE SHOWCASED 🎬🎥🍿

🧶🐈‍⬛

1/n Image
Image
Image
As a ten tweet primer the competition in the form of Starlink regenerative architecture(green👇) is having severe problems with handovers.

As also can be seen AST is a different architecture altogether.

You’ll notice:

One single core.
gNBs (5G)

V/S

Two cores
eNB & gNB

2/n Image
But it is far from the only differentiator.

Here is a primer to another difference needed as background.

Starlink uses earth moving cells, EMC.

AST SpaceMobile uses earth fixed cells, EFC. Picture hex grids all over the planet each cell having it’s own cell ID.

Fixed.

3/n Image
Image
Image
Read 22 tweets
Feb 8
Welcome to todays episode of

MAKING MICRONS

Prsenting is me, CatSE, to walk you through the wonders of advanced phased arrays.

Todays subheading is

COMPARISON.

We’ll relate micron generations to eachother and to others arrays.

🧶🐈‍⬛

Let’s start!

1/n Image
The Block1 micron is a panel about 30 millimeters thick and 644 x 1,288
millimeters wide.

On one side antennas and on the other solar panels.

The antennas have a spacing that corresponds to a certain spectrum band.

The larger the spacing the lower the frequenzy.

2/n Image
You will notice that the antenna element spacing differs between satellite arrays that do Lowband, Midband and C-band respectively.

And that you can choose spacing to capture a certain range.

For $ASTS tech that range is wide it differs 1:1.55 between upper and lower bound.

3/ Image
Read 23 tweets
Jan 6
Small update.

Starlink beam diameter of 50 km. (Blue)

Advertised AST midband beam diameter is 24 km for comparison.(Red)

What it means practically is that spectum deployed with Starlink d2c will be used by 3.3 x more users per MHz.

Cutting area SE to 1/3 by this metric alone. Image
Image
-It’s called SpectRum with an R, cat.

-Right. My mistake. I like all sorts of Rum

🍹 🌈🛜 no offense intended.

-What is ”area spectral efficiency, cat?

-It is the key performance metric of an 3GPP NTN system.

-What is it made of and why is it important?

-I’m glad you asked
- We could first get more detailed and say that it is the mean area spectral efficiency that is key. Not the peak area spectral efficiency.

-Yeah, or alternatively we coukd simplify the concept instead of making it more complex. I’m not following, cat.

-Ah. Eli 5?

-Yes Please.
Read 50 tweets
Dec 27, 2024
The case for Low Earth orbit radar.

And sharing spectrum between DoD and Telecom.

This image shows the Chinese bomber fleet range. Previous and that of H-20 bomber project a bomber similar to the US flying wing stealth bombers.

As can be seen Hawaii is now within range.

1/n Image
Image
A bit smaller regional nuclear capable strike aircraft like this one shown yesterday (JH-XX ?) are likely capable of reaching places like Guam and Japan.

The two types of aircraft are built for stealth, low observability. And likely capable of electronic warfare.

2/n Image
Australia ponders buting the B21 as a strategic deterrent.

It is the most modern US stealth bomber and is capable of reaching chinese airforce bases.

The opposite would be true of the chinese equivallent.

3/n Image
Image
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(