Will it start with how they hired as CEO a mother who took her son to be castrated in Thailand at the age of 16 because his dad didn't approve of having an effeminate little boy?
Will it look at Mermaids' involvement in the case where a 7-year-old child was removed from the custody of his mother after the court found that the child had been essentially groomed into a transgender identity 4thwavenow.com/tag/transgende…
Will it look at Mermaids relationship with GenderGP and Helen Webberley?
Will it look at the data breach where they allowed
780 pages of confidential emails to be viewable online for nearly three years. This led to personal information, such as names and email addresses, of 550 people being searchable online.
Will it look at their views on the protected characteristic of belief and whether people with gender critical beliefs should be protected against belief discrimination consortium.lgbt/ehrc-open-lett…
And how it pressured Hodder Law to remove coverage of the Harry Miller case from an A level text book?
You know, the Good Law Project that thinks that men who say they are women are less of a threat than other men, and women who say they are men don't need the same protection as other women. goodlawproject.org/ehrc-guide-tra…
But hey, let's get the government to distribute massive amounts of disposable personal protective wear
(didn't the Good Law Project just work out that government are not good at this?)
3 ex-WEP members write "Fighting for the soul of WEP is like fighting with the man who keeps punching you in the face as he screams ‘look what you made me do’"
Things I say rarely get commented on by Owen Jones, Billy Bragg, Robin Moira White etc.. but the library rhyme time scheme really seemed to hit a nerve with these people and the hoards of TRA/MRA trolls who are playing it for lols.
A bunch of people have jumped on me saying I am criticising a book. Just to be clear: this isn’t a book (people can write crappy books with ugly cartoon characters if they want). This is about a public library scheme for parents (mainly mothers) and toddlers.
My concerns (following a message from a mum who said it felt ideological, creepy and gaslighting) were: 1. It is promoting gender ideology (non-binary, they/them pronouns) to children 2. It is excluding parents (mainly mothers) who don’t want this.