@ChtyCommission please remember that The Equality Act 2010 says that “you must not be discriminated against because you are transsexual, when your gender identity is different from the sex assigned to you when you were born.” equalityhumanrights.com/en/advice-and-… 🧵
@ChtyCommission please note the recommendations from the Women and Equalities Commission that….. 🧵
“in the current review of the service specification and protocol for the Gender Identity Development Service, consideration be given to reducing the amount of time required for the assessment that service-users must undergo before blockers and hormones can be prescribed.” 🧵
@ChtyCommission This is undeniable acknowledgement that some children and young people will have a different gender identity to the sex that they were assigned at birth, and that even the most currently debated intervention, blockers and hormones, is acceptable, and necessary. 🧵
@ChtyCommission we call on you to “provide clear de-pathologizing statements on the needs and rights of gender diverse children and on the damage caused by discriminatory and transphobic rules, laws, and norms” as advised by WPATH 2022 🧵 tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.108…
@ChtyCommission Please understand that although there is intense public debate about the needs of these children and young people, their health and safety and wellbeing must be of the utmost importance to us all. 🧵
@ChtyCommission please be aware that @Mermaids_Gender have been under attack. Please ensure that your investigation is unbiased and fair and considers the needs of the beneficiaries of this charity to be of the utmost importance.🧵 #transyouth 🏳️⚧️🏳️⚧️
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/4 There will be unrest and panic caused by media coverage of draft NHS guidance that seems to seek to prevent UK trans youth from accessing the care that they need. 🧵
2/4 The highly skilled and highly regulated team of specialists at @GenderGP will continue to provide puberty blockers, hormones and surgical referrals to people of all ages as and when appropriate.
3/4 The UK is trailing far behind the international centres of excellence in terms of research, guidance, and essential care. In years to come they will look back on this with shame.
1/ I wanted to give you all an update on what has been happening since the end of the GMC investigation into my Fitness to Practice medicine.
2/ I was referred to the GMC in 2016 by Prof Hindmarsh and Prof Gary Butler at UCLH following my treatment of a 12 year old boy who had been started on puberty blockers via GIDS but then had been told he would not be able to start his male puberty until he was 16.
3/ I prescribed him testosterone at the age of 12 and he has flourished. This is obviously not in line with UK practice, but is more in line with International best practice of ‘stages not ages’.
1. I have many anxieties about the future of NHS medical care for trans youth in the UK. Will these ‘Regional Centres’ be providing puberty blockers and hormones or just psychological support and conversion therapy?
2. Who will be providing the care, who will be training the providers, what protocols will they be following? While big International centres are becoming more and more sure that affirmation saves lives, the UK retreats back.
3. Puberty blockers and puberty with peers are essential for the wellbeing of trans youth who want them. Will the NHS be brave enough to provide them? The politicians, the regulators and the NHS need to make sure we are putting our patients’ needs first and giving permission.
1. So how has my case finally ended? I have been under investigation since December 2016, and unable to work since May 2017. I have been suspended for two months for serious professional misconduct, or if I appeal then I am suspended until the appeal is decided (over a year).
2. They did not take any action on anything except the allegation of not discussing fertility adequately. Not even the conviction because they realised I was in a hard place surrounding that. Here are the fertility facts:
3. Allegation: ‘Following an initial consultation with Patient C on 9 November 2016 you failed to provide good clinical care in that you advised Patient C as to the risks of GnRHA GnRHa before commencing treatment without discussing the risks to Patient C’s fertility’
1. The MPTS have found that some of their findings of fact amount to what they term as (non-serious) ‘misconduct’, but they do not mean that my fitness to practice is impaired.
2. However, they have found some findings to be ‘serious misconduct’ and that my fitness to practice is ‘currently impaired’ because of that. I have explained them below. The next stage will be to determine what ‘sanction’ may be appropriate.
3. The options are 1) no sanction (that would be unusual when they have found impairment) 2) conditions on my registration (I can work but only if I do this that or the other) 3) Suspension (I have been unable to work since 2017 and formally suspended since 2018) 4) Erasure.