I haven't tweeted about Ukraine in a while, and the battlefield has been (relatively) static for almost a month, but there are things happening that signal long term direction, most of it favoring Ukraine. A 🧵. 1/n
I'll lead with the bad part first. As I mentioned in a previous thread, I expected conditions around Bakhmut to continue to deteriorate and Ukraine to give ground as Russian troops from Kherson arrive. It's a bloody affair of trenches and artillery. 2/n cnbc.com/2022/11/30/tre…
But, the Russian advances are incremental against a goal that has no real strategic value anymore. I believe Bakhmut is now mostly just to create a (pyrrhic) victory to boost morale, and for Wagner to use it to gain more political (and monetary) power. 3/n
It's pyrrhic because of the Russian casualties, and the fact that Bakhmut is already leveled and most of the people fled. I also believe that Russian casualties are significantly heavier than Ukrainian ones. This has been a matter of debate, but I have some receipts. 4/n
Some NATO folks have claimed that both sides have suffered roughly 100,000 casualties (KIA/WIA/MIA). Eh... maybe? But there's things to consider.
I've been told by a source that the Ukrainian figure includes civilians. 5/n
There's also the matter of WIA vs. KIA ratio. Russian battlefield medicine is terrible. We also have tons of video of them just leaving wounded people to die. Ukraine denies these figures vehemently, and has generally been more truthful that Russia. 6/n newsweek.com/ukraine-releas…
Additionally, Russia's strategy is to put mobiks and prisoners out front as meat in human wave attacks to preserve what professional forces they have left. Reportedly RUs prison population has dropped by 25%, and another round of mobilization is coming 7/n telegraph.co.uk/world-news/202…
Ukraine is attempting to win by conserving forces, while training up new professional ones in the UK and Germany.
Thus, it is my opinion that Russia is suffering far more KIA than Ukraine, and that it's not sustainable for several reasons. 8/n
First, someone has to keep the lights on back in the USSR (err, I mean Russia). Mobilizing your work force to go die in Ukraine means they're not at home doing the things necessary to keep society functioning. Eventually the system suffers. 9/n
Then there's morale issues. Mobiks are starting to realize that there's no end to the war in sight, no one ever gets rotated home, they're all disposable, and that the only way they're seeing mom or the wife again is from inside a zinc-lined box. 10/n
There's also winter weather. We're seeing quite a few videos suggesting that Russian troops, are dying of hypothermia. This is due to poor training, poor equipment, and general lack of concern by Russian leadership for "disposable" troops. 11/n forbes.com/sites/davidaxe…
This is only going to get worse as the ground freezes, and temperatures drop even more in the south (and not just Svatove). I see little evidence that Russia is doing anything to alter the equation (better training, equipment, or change in attitudes by leadership). 12/n
There was never an intention to keep these people alive. But, every one that dies means more equipment lost, meaning that they'll be dipping further and further into old Soviet stores. The entire Russian calculus is that Ukraine will run out of people and artillery first. 13/n
Way back at the beginning of the war, I mentioned that we were going to find out if public opinion could eventually end a war in an anocracy (Russia). Well, Russian's are not that supportive now, and it's likely to get worse as casualties mount. 14/n meduza.io/feature/2022/1…
Which brings us to a couple of rays of hope here for Ukraine. First is that they have managed to set up their own production line of 152mm artillery shells. Despite massive western aid, most of their tubes are still Soviet-standard 122mm and 152mm. 15/n finance.yahoo.com/news/ukrainian…
The US has steadfastly refused to proved Ukraine with ATACMS. However, there are other munitions coming online that could boost the range of HIMARS, including the GMLRs ER, and the ground launched SDB. 16/n thedrive.com/the-war-zone/g…
The latter is exciting, because it relies on munitions that are already readily available (M26 rocket motors+GBU-39B). Both systems would extend HIMARS range from 80 out to ~150 km, further complicating / worsening Russian logistics. We could (maybe) see these this spring 17/n
The US is also considering dramatically expanding training of Ukrainian troops in Germany, to augment what the UK is already doing. US officers I have spoken with have been impressed how far Ukraine has come since 2014, shifting from Soviet to NATO. 18/n
Then there's the promise that Ukraine will join NATO in the future. While this doesn't help much immediately, it signals intent, as well as opens the door a bit for cooperation and coordination now. It also exposes a fundamental truth: Russia has lost already. 19/n
Even if the shooting stopped this instant, and Russia kept all the currently occupied land (it won't), it's lost half its conventional capability or more, and it won't be reconstituted for decades. It's field officer corps is shattered. 20/n
The mobiks who go home will return remembering how they were used as meat, and possibly missing appendages from frostbite. The Russian economy is sanctioned and growth limited. Finland and Sweden have joined NATO (as soon as Hungary ratifies). 21/n
Ukraine will join NATO. NATO countries take the Russian threat seriously again, and are ramping up defense spending and readiness. (I can't emphasize enough how Sweden and Finland make Russian ambitions in the Baltics almost impossible) 22/n
Russian casualties over the winter are going to be brutal, and a second wave of mobilization in January is going to be very unpopular, while exacerbating manpower shortages inside Russia. Word of people freezing to death will work its way back to the populace. 23/n
Russian morale is already terrible. They're employing blocking units. There's no washing machines left to steal, metaphorically. Neither side is interested in suing for peace (though Russia would if they were smart, the situation won't get better for them). 24/n
Ukraine might even be able to free up troops protecting Odesa.
I put out a tweet thread the other day about why there's reasons for optimism regarding Ukraine. Those who know me get that I'm not an optimist by nature, though. Ukraine faces a number of really nasty problems and disadvantages though. 1/n
I wasn't trying to ignore these, I just tend to believe that the issues Ukraine faces aren't as bad as what Russia has to contend with, particularly the issue of morale and training. Still, if Ukraine ends up settling on unfavorable terms, these are the reasons I'd expect. 2/n
The number one threat to the Ukrainian war effort is its utter reliance on Western allies for material and intelligence. If the spigot of arms got turned off, it would be catastrophic. The US is the top supplier, and that's in jeopardy. 3/n
I haven't commented on the rising tide of anti-Semitism recently, because I didn't feel like I had to. People seemed to know that's a place you don't go because of the horrific history of it. Or, I didn't want to tie it to other things.
But we've crossed the Rubicon now. 1/n
Before I go further, I want to make sure people know how vile, hateful, and historically awful I find this. To my Jewish friends and colleagues, I am sad, angry and disgusted that you have to endure this barrage of public animus and demonization. 2/n
The dogwhistles have always been there. Globalists, Soros and "cultural Marxists" have been thrown around a lot over the past decade by the right. We've seen it creeping in closer as right wing anti-trans types have blamed "gender ideology" on a "cabal" of Jewish Billionaires 3/n
I tried a simple thought exercise: what would happen to the GOP if it eschewed the bigotry and culture war stuff. What would the party look like if it tried to tack back towards the center and the American mainstream. The answer kind of surprised me. 1/n
Well, you'd end up with Mitt Romney. Or Larry Hogan or Charlie Baker. And we know there's no real appetite for that: particularly given that the country club tax cuts for the rich thing doesn't play well with the base. Support for the tax cut was soft 2/n news.gallup.com/opinion/pollin…
The GOP base isn't held together on economic policy: they never really rallied around the Trump tax cuts for the rich. The base is much more into populist economic stuff like tariffs. 90% of Republicans said that the economy was a top priority 3/n pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022…
This discusses some of the difficulties in bringing back banned accounts while filtering for people who committed crimes. The short version is Twitter can't do this with the staff it has, so it will probably just blanket un-ban everyone to appease Musk 1/n washingtonpost.com/technology/202…
The result will be the opening the door to very bad things. We're very close to watching the world's richest guy enter the "F*** around and find out" territory. Or, play stupid games, win stupid prizes, for a lot of reasons. 2/n
Ignore the headline on this article (I didn't pick it): the point of it was that Musk's quest for "free speech" on Twitter would likely kill it off for several reasons. These are now coming into sharp focus. It's behind a paywall, so I'll discuss each 3/n
There's a list going around of "Antifa" accounts. I'm not worried about it: it looks sloppily put together from an automated pull of accounts that are vaguely linked. Pretty sure Britney Spears, Biden, CIA, and FBI aren't "Antifa". It's about scaring people. 1/n
At the same time, Musk is ranting that he's really a centrist, while saying the "woke mind virus" will destroy humanity. Repeatedly.
I can assure you, no actual "moderate" ever used the term "woke mind virus" unironically. It's like the words "death panels" or the 14 words. 2/n
It's an absolute ideological giveaway. But here's the thing... I've yet to see anyone like Musk define what the "woke mind virus" is. As far as I can tell, it's mostly just trans people, and teaching history that doesn't shy away from acknowledging our national sins. 3/n
@michelleinbklyn is a disgrace, and a perfect example of how leaving out crucial information is a tactic of both the NYT and right wing media. It's also a part of the normalization of violence against trans people, and why I fear genocide is increasingly a real risk. 1/n
First, she cites Christopher Rufo's aggressive campaign against drag queens, but fails to acknowledge that he's also made hateful anti-trans propaganda a top priority as well. He even blamed the outcome in Afghanistan on trans people. 2/n
Goldberg also failed to acknowledge that the other leading anti-drag crusaders (Raichik and Walsh) are also the leading purveyors of anti-transgender stochastic violence. They all target both drag and trans. They are inextricably linked. 3/n