To be clear: 1) I understand why people believe patriarchy is God-ordained 2) I think marriages often function egalitarian even if they claim male headship 3) For those who ascribe to complementarianism--I do not question their faith & I'm willing to work with them
However
4) I think patriarchy is wrong. I cannot say otherwise. 5) Even though many folk who ascribe to Xian patriarchy never experience its dark underbelly, that doesn't mean it isn't there. 6) Good people can still be complicit in harmful systems of oppression.
My goal is to help people without academic training to have access to the same tools & scholarship I do.
I hope this will help them see historical reality of patriarchy, which I hope brings understanding that complementarian beliefs stem more from culture than faith.
If you have been listening to @MikeWingerii's series on women in ministry, etc., I hope you will listen to me too. Instead of taking his word about #MakingBiblicalWomanhood, I hope you will read it for yourself and check out the research that I cite. I purposefully cited sources
that are more accessible to people outside of academia and without access to academic libraries (as much as I could). I will be posting an additional resource guide too.
Please know this isn't just me saying I think this. This isn't just me telling you what I think.
This is historical scholarship combined with biblical scholarship backed up by reams and reams of evidence and analyzed by scholars who have submitted their work through rigorous peer review process.
While I respect the intelligence and creativity of folk just teaching the Bible
Please remember that opinions are not the same as evidence. Follow the sources of the evidence that the people you listen to present. Check out the credentials of the sources they cite. Check out who is publishing the material they are citing.
It isn't hard to figure out...
It isn't hard to figure out the credibility of public figures. I will be writing more about this @anxious_bench and my newsletter bethallisonbarr.com to help you make informed decisions about who you listen to.
Until then, check out the post on Tuesday @anxious_bench.
Also, here are some past posts I have written on this topic.
Hey, y'all, remember my promise to engage @MikeWingerii's videos on women? I am really excited to be sharing next week @anxious_bench about a fantastic new resource that will address Wingerii's discussions by Andrew Bartlett and @TerranWilliams4. So look for it next Tuesday :)
1. It is some SBC pastors who have tried to restore Johnny Hunt. Not the official SBC stance (@bartbarber made this clear).
2. It is also 1250 SBC pastors who signed statement calling for disfellowship of churches who hire female pastors...
It is not official SBC stance.
3. It is also an SBC pastor who confirmed Hunt’s speaking at a conference in February 2023. This pastor is also one of signatures on list of 1250 calling for disfellowship of churches with female pastors.
4. All this is close on heels of
the release of horrific revelations about obstruction of victims of sexual abuse and the enabling of abusive structures by SBC pastors & leaders.
Official SBC stance may be against restoration of Hunt. But the face of the SBC is pastors once again valuing abuser over abused
Sometimes I wonder how much more evidence the SBC needs to understand the danger of a gender theology that teaches women belong under male authority; that God created men to have power over women.
To put so much stock in a theology built on translation of 1 word is gutsy.
(whatever you say, I’ve been reading tons of complementarian sources lately, and the crux seems to be 1 Timothy 2:12…oh, and of course, the backdrop of old-fashioned-human-patriarchy)
I do believe most women in these systems have been raised to believe it is true. That is why I stayed too. But I think it is important for us to recognize that these systems also help women who support them, which makes it harder for us to leave too.
I strongly encourage everyone to read Stained Glass Ceilings with an open heart and mind. It is beautifully and generously written, attending to the real women with strengths and struggles in evangelical spaces.
Want to know a secret? I love Tolkien. Much more than Lewis. Maybe not quite as much
as Sayers, but close. I read The Hobbit every year for about 10 years, and the LOTR series almost as much. Now Tolkien’s translation of Beowulf gets read frequently too.
I liked the Jackson movies, not as much as the books, but I still liked them.
The Hobbit movies were not my favorite, although I love Martin Freeman as Bilbo.
So far I really like the new LOTR Ring series. I love the diversity of the cast, and Galadriel reminds me of some of the fierce women in medieval literature, such as Saga of Hrolf Kraki.
Bear with me:
I'm struggling with the stated reason for TVC disciplining Matt Chandler: "frequency and familiarity" of conversations with a woman "who was not his wife."
I suspect this isn't the whole story. But that doesn't matter for my concern:
My concern is this Harry-Met-Sally mentality that women & men cannot be friends without a cloud of suspicion over the "frequency and familiarity" of their conversations. My concern is that evangelical hyper-focus on sexual purity has warped our ability to have normal friendships.
If a friendship with a woman "who was not his wife" is the sole reason Matt Chandler is being disciplined, especially if (as Chandler insisted) it was neither sexual nor romantic, shouldn't that raise red flags for us?
Again, I suspect this isn't the whole story. If it is,