Quite right.

As Andrew’s employer has shown, the correct mode of address for judges is “Enemy of The People”. Image
In the meantime, this “PC Wokery” sounds like a dangerous cad. I hope his sergeant yanks him into line before he infects anybody else. Image
(Explainer for anybody curious about thicko @toryboypierce’s moronising: judges in certain lower courts are now to be addressed as “judge”, on the woke basis that they are, well, judges. In Crown Courts, they will still be Your Honour. In High Court and above, still My Lord/Lady) Image
For further reference, I touch on modes of address for judges in #NothingButTheTruth. Should sweary bestselling books about criminal justice be up your alleyway.

waterstones.com/book/nothing-b… Image
This is the official announcement confirming the change in mode of address for the judiciary in certain lower courts.

I will pay ten thousand pounds if anybody, including dimwit @toryboypierce, can point out the “PC wokery”.

judiciary.uk/message-from-t…
(For completeness, I should point out that the changes also affect Masters, a type of judge who sits in the High Court. But the other changes affect lower courts such as District Judges sitting in magistrates’ courts).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Secret Barrister

The Secret Barrister Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BarristerSecret

Nov 22
Ooh, shall we talk “irresponsible”, @DominicRaab?

Because I wonder if our definitions differ.

Irresponsible, to me, is supporting the chronic defunding of criminal justice during your entire spell as a Parliamentarian.

And of course, there’s more. 🧵

bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi… Image
Irresponsible is cutting 21,000 police officers and a quarter of Crown Prosecutors. Meaning it often takes around two years - at least - simply for a suspect to be charged.

Meaning that potentially dangerous people are free to roam the streets.

@DominicRaab
Irresponsible is selling off nearly half the court estate, meaning that people have to travel for hours to their local court (and so many simply don’t). It means witnesses and victims are deterred from the outset.

@DominicRaab
Read 12 tweets
Oct 26
Dominic Raab:

The Greatest Hits 💽💽💽

In his most recent spell as Justice Secretary, @DominicRaab achieved the following: 🧵
1. Dominic Raab created a record backlog in the Crown Courts by continuing his predecessors’ chronic underfunding of the criminal justice system.

His “plan” to reduce the backlog was ridiculed by fellow MPs as “meagre”, as it would still leave people waiting years for a trial.
2. Dominic Raab ignored his own government’s independent report into criminal legal aid, refusing to implement the urgent funding that the report said was needed “as soon as possible” to prevent the system collapsing. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Read 10 tweets
Oct 23
An illustration of the crisis in criminal justice:

We are working to capacity. All available judges, courts & barristers working flat out

In the past two weeks, I have had two trials adjourned for “lack of court time”

Each case is from 2019 and has been adjourned TWICE before.
This has nothing to do with barristers’ industrial action. It is not because of Covid.

It is due to a chronic lack of resourcing, which has seen courts sold off and underused, insufficient judges recruited and a quarter of criminal barristers forced out of the profession.
We have warned of the problems in the courts for *years*. Long before Covid, we urged the government to stop cutting criminal justice to the bone. MPs even had their own, crowdfunded, personal guide to the problems: theguardian.com/law/2018/apr/0…
Read 10 tweets
Oct 9
For those who have asked, after careful consideration, I have decided to vote NO to the government's offer to the Criminal Bar.

My reasons for doing so are no better nor worthy of note than anybody else's, but what is Twitter without solipsism? So here goes.
1. The government's own independent review urged an immediate 15% increase as a *bare minimum* back in November 2021. It was intended to be a large, above-inflation increase to reflect the perilous position of the profession, the attrition rate, and the 28% cut.
2. This, as Sir Christopher Bellamy said in the review, was not "an opening bid". It was the minimum needed, as soon as possible, to ensure the system functioned.

The government refused to act.

A year later that 15% has been wiped out by inflation. But the problems remain.
Read 24 tweets
Sep 6
In today’s episode of “Things I Didn’t Expect To Say When I Started Tweeting As An Anonymous Lawsplaining Rabbit”, may I place on record my thanks to Leonardo Di Caprio’s new alleged love interest for what I think we can all agree is her exquisite taste in literature.

#FakeLaw
Not *just* a law book, MailOnline. A Sunday Times bestselling law book exploring the popular myths we are fed about our justice system by those in power, from the author of fellow bestsellers “Stories of the Law and How it’s Broken” and “Nothing But The Truth”. Oh yes.

#FakeLaw
Anyway, if you want to get in on the act and read the literature of the Hollywood elite, #FakeLaw is available from all these lovely places.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 23
Evidence, if it were needed, of how little @jcartlidgemp understood the basics of his brief as justice minister.

His brilliant plan would

(A) Cost far more than it costs to pay independent barristers

(B) Instantly create a national shortage of barristers available to prosecute
Because here’s the thing that people like @jcartlidgemp fail to grasp.

Criminal barristers don’t just defend.

We don’t just prosecute.

Our independence means that we do both. We have the experience of both, which makes us better at both.

He wants to abolish this.

Insanity.
What @jcartlidgemp has done is read the stories like this, of a growing shortage of specialist criminal barristers available to prosecute serious crime, and think to himself:

“The solution is to ban barristers from prosecuting”.

The stupidity is off the scale.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(