🧵regarding one of the most basic and commonly used instruments in surgery...the DeBakey forceps.
DeBakey forceps were designed for vascular and cardiac surgery, but now are used by almost everyone.
I'm surprised myself that we haven't covered it already.
So here goes... 1/
Michael DeBakey doesn't need much introduction: he was one of the most famous surgeons of all time. He was a pioneer in cardiothoracic and vascular surgery and was at Baylor for decades, eventually becoming chancellor. His rivalry with Denton Cooley was the stuff of legends.
DeBakey also was by all accounts very malignant, even when judged against old-school cardiac surgeons in Texas. And other behaviors were problematic. He wouldn't last 24 hr at a US hospital today.
He leaves a large but complex legacy that everyone has their own opinion about.
'DeBakey forceps' were initially custom made for DeBakey himself by the George Pilling & Son Company in Philadelphia. This is the earliest version of the ad I can find, and is from 1960.
The site of the Pilling offices later became the Franklin Building on the Penn campus.
Like most forceps, DeBakeys have a series of ridges on the side to enhance the grip.
This is a modification going back many centuries, as can be seen from the drawing of forceps with similar ridges from the ancient Roman era (R picture, forcep 'G'; from Kirkup's book).
Nor is the general size and profile of the DeBakey forceps anything new.
Forcep 2 on the R picture (also from the Kirkup book) is from the Roman era also. It is remarkably similar to modern DeBakey forceps.
One end of the DeBakey forceps has a single row of teeth. If you look carefully, it also has 2 small grooves (red arrows) which will accommodate the 2 rows of teeth on the other prong of the forcep.
And as you might expect, the other prong has the opposite configuration.
Here there are two rows of teeth, and also a groove to accommodate the single row of teeth from the other prong.
The teeth and grooves fit together with precision, but one sees that they do not do this along the entire length of the row of teeth. There is a little gap present proximally (R photo). The gap closes with a little pressure (not shown).
The small interlocking ridges on the tips of the DeBakey forceps enable you to grab and manipulate needles fairly easily.
It is much harder to do this with forceps without the ridges, such as with 'rat-tooth' forceps on the right.
Example showing the ease of grabbing small needles (5-0 Vicryl on PS-2 here). One can readily manipulate the needle to grab it with the needle holder.
There are limits to this. You want to follow the curvature of the needle and so forth...surgeons often get sloppy here.
One should try to avoid grabbing the actual suture threads though.
In 1989, Dobrin wrote that grasping small Prolene sutures (6-0) with DeBakeys caused them to weaken in a dose dependent fashion.
Grasping the threads with forceps weakened them than most other common maneuvers.
DeBakey forceps can be used to grab many different kinds of tissue, not just vessels. They are precise, tend to grab tissues reasonably well due to the ridges, and tend not to crush the tissue too much, unless one is not careful.
One still needs to keep tissue crushing in mind though, as some can occur with DeBakeys.
Here are 'during' and 'after' pictures of chicken meat grasped for about 15 seconds with a DeBakey at a typical pressure. One can see there are marks left over.
Here are the same 'during' and 'after' pictures, except with toothed Adson forceps.
In some cases toothed forceps may be better for the tissues due to the decreased pressure one has to apply on the tips of the forceps. This is a complicated topic for another day, however...🧐🤔
DeBakey forceps come in different lengths. As they get longer, the tips start having a weaker grip becasue they are still generally of about the same size.
This is a 12" DeBakey. The grip is noticeably weaker, and deforms more easily when picking up objects.
Reference:
As before, chicken thighs were sourced from Draper Valley Farms via QFC market in Beaverton, OR. Accessed December 3, 2022.
The study was conducted under an EFIC (Exception from Informed Chicken) protocol.
⬛️
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
With the ASGBI meeting taking place in Edinburgh, it is prudent to revisit my previous 🧵on the deaths in the movie 'Braveheart'.
As you may recall, the goal was to estimate how many deaths were preventable if trauma surgical care was available in Scotland at the time.
(1/)
Once again, we will make some assumptions here:
- rapid 'scoop and run' transport
- casualties present individually and do not overwhelm the system.
The geography of this area provides certain benefits in terms of casualty allocation, as we'll see.
Specifically...in Braveheart, most of the deaths occurred in the Battle of Stirling and the Battle of Falkirk (approximate locations shown here).
As you can see, most of the major trauma centers in Scotland are located close nearby, making the transport more straightforward.
an underappreciated surgical knot that is used to secure a running suture. It has been shown to be more secure than a square knot.
We will cover how to do it, what not to do, and a modification that may make it more secure. (1/ )
An Aberdeen knot can be used at the end of a continuous (running) suture as an alternative to a square knot.
With a typical square knot, you will either be tying one strand to the two other strands in the loop, either by hand (L photo) or with an instrument tie (R photo).
But the Aberdeen knot is different. Instead of tying to the 2 strands, instead you'll use the single strand to go through the loop that is made by the other 2 strands.
Here, I'm holding the loop open with my R hand and using one of my R fingers to grab the string.
🧵regarding the Bovie, which is one of the most commonly used tools in surgery.
I have decided to reorganize my Bovie content into something that makes more sense, which will require multiple 🧵. This first one will cover the very basics and is geared toward students. (1/ )
Briefly:
Recall that the Bovie is just a tool for completing an electrical circuit that includes a patient's body.
The current passes through the whole system, but because the tip of the Bovie is small, whereas the pad is large, the effect occurs at the place we want it to.
The Bovie is not like the light switch in your house that just turns the current on and off.
Instead, we may adjust the intensity of the current and we can also modify the delivery of current (which the machine calls 'CUT' and 'COAG') to provide different effects on the tissue.
Short 🧵regarding the 'gold' Bookwalter ratchet and one feature that makes it behave differently from the regular ratchet, other than the fact that it rotates.
Also we'll look at a couple of other pointers about the Bookwalter knickknacks. (1/ )
If you use the Bookwalter, you're aware that the tray comes with a large number of the standard 'clicky things' (officially: 'ratchets').
It usually also comes with some gold ratchets (usually 4 of these) and we all know that these *can rotate*.
This rotation of course enables you to rotate the retractor blade when it is connected to the ring. You cannot do this if the blade is connected to the 'regular' clicky thing.
But you may have noticed that the gold ones also just 'seem' better even when they are *not* rotated.
🧵regarding the introducer sheath commonly known as a 'Cordis' catheter.
We'll go over what it was originally designed for and why it ended up being adopted by other specialties for entirely different reasons.
Also we'll look at its accessories and see what's inside one. (1/ )
In the mid 1970's, angiographic procedures started to be done using introducer sheaths, which were much more convenient than passing all the devices through vascular cutdowns, as before.
There was some blood loss with each device exchange, and a sheath was patented to fix this.
Specifically, it had rubber gaskets inside the end that formed a seal and minimized blood loss with each exchange.
Shown here is the drawing from the 1977 patent and also a modern example of the sealing apparatus from a different company (I cracked the end open with a hammer).
🧵regarding the side hole at the end of most endotracheal tubes. This is the 'Murphy eye'.
You may or may not have noticed the Murphy eye before. Here we'll briefly go over what it is for, some unintended consequences of it, and (of course) a little history. (1/ )
Frank Murphy was an anesthesiologist with interesting choices in facial hair that worked in various places (here seen at UCSF). At the time he devised his tubes, he was at Harper Hospital in Detroit.
Only a little is known about him, and is found here: bit.ly/3ZRK2O6
In essence, Murphy devised his own endotracheal tubes, and listed a number of things these tubes should have that he thought were an improvement over Magill tubes.
Among these was the hole at the end, which came to be called the 'Murphy eye'.