So, there has been a great deal of focus on the £122m of gowns sold by PPE Medpro. They were purchased for only £46m and never used by the NHS. 🧵
But PPE Medpro also sold us on 30 May 2020 IIR facemasks for £81m some of which were manufactured by a company called Hunan Eexi.
Both the date (30 May) and the manufacturer (Hunan Eexi) were important. The date, which can be seen from published documents, is important because PPE prices were fluctuating (although were much more stable by late May). I have unpublished spreadsheets showing the manufacturer.
I can also see from those spreadsheets the unpublished per unit prices we bought the IIR facemasks manufactured by Hunan Eexi for from PPE Medpro: 38.5p each.
I can also see that several weeks later, on 17 May 2020, we bought IIR facemasks, again from Hunan Eexi, from Brandology for only 14.5p per unit. (The manufacturer and per unit price come from my spreadsheet.) This is less than half of the 38.5p per unit price we paid PPE Medpro
And I can also see that four days earlier, on 26 May, we bought IIR facemasks, again manufactured by Hunan Eexi, from Blueleaf for only 20.1p each. (The contract value published by DHSC is wrong, and the manufacturer and per unit price come from my spreadsheet.)
None of this is denied by DHSC - the allegations have been put to it - but in short you and I paid PPE Medpro for IIR facemasks made by Hunan Eexi around double the price we bought them for from other suppliers just days before and just days after.
We know from a Sunday Times report that PPE Medpro is being investigated for possible bribery, although we don't know who they bribed.
We also know that Ministers - Matt Hancock and Michael Gove - are briefing newspapers that (precious darlings) they were bullied by Michelle Mone into awarding PPE Medpro contracts either at staggering mark-ups,(gowns) or at double the prices we were paying others (facemasks).
Who knows how the story ends. But it is a very peculiar line for Hancock and Gove to take in the context of apparent criminal bribery investigations: that they were bullied into giving her £200m of public money. Really?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Basically operating a fraud is @wizzair, @WizzAirUK_W9. 🧵
So, last night I tried to check in - I am speaking at a conference - and I couldn't because there was a technical issue with their software.
This morning, I came to the airport - the flight is delayed, of course - and because I hadn't checked in yesterday I was charged another £44.50, two thirds of the cost of the ticket, to be issued with a boarding card.
The Minister who introduced the Gender Recognition Bill in the House of Lords in 2003 made it clear that "a transsexual person would have protection under the Sex Discrimination Act [the predecessor to the Equality Act] as a person of the acquired sex or gender."
This was reflected in the Explanatory Notes to the Gender Recognition Act when it was published.
The Supreme Court dismissed the explanatory notes as not indicating Parliament's intention.
But it seems entirely unaware of the speech of the Minister introducing the Bill, who made it perfectly clear that it was intended to extend the protections beyond biological sex.
I've been reflecting some more overnight on the For Some Women Scotland case. 🧵
In this piece, which I am proud of and I stand by every word, I make two serious criticisms of the procedure that the Supreme Court adopted. goodlawproject.org/the-supreme-co…
The first is that in a case which is fundamentally about the rights of trans people with gender recognition certificates the Supreme Court excluded all trans voices and added in the voices of those opposed to the right and dignities of trans people.
Good Law Project holds a copy of new NHS Guidance published yesterday and it is clear that Wes Streeting is continuing his war on trans people.
Remarkably the national health service is now directing GPs to cause harm to the community. 🧵
Background: the UK is a serious international outlier in how it approaches healthcare for young trans people. All over the world Governments are declining to follow the policy based evidence making of the Cass report. I believe we now have the most hostile regime anywhere.
Families in the UK who want to follow best medical practice - rather than pleasing Wes Streeting's true electorate (right wing media barons) - obtain puberty blockers (criminalised in the UK) from regulated prescribers in eg France or Netherlands or Switzerland.
One or both were marked “private and confidential - not for publication”.
We have long (👇) deplored the practice of making threats which you say are confidential to try and stop your critics from telling the world you are trying to silence them. goodlawproject.org/they-want-to-s…
Neither letter pretends to be a formal letter under the pre-action protocol for defamation claims - a necessary precondition to suing. Yet each is pregnant with threat.
To intimate you have a legal claim which you don’t actually have also feels to us like a misuse of the law.
New article in the New England Journal of Medicine, founded in 1812 and amongst the most prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals. Its 2023 impact factor was 96.2, ranking it 2nd out of 168 journals in the category "Medicine, General & Internal".
I will share some extracts from it but tl;dr it is highly critical. It "transgresses medical law, policy and practice... deviates from pharmaceutical regulatory standards in the UK. And if it had been published in the United States... it would have violated federal law."
It calls for "evidentiary standards... that are not applied elsewhere in pediatric medicine... [and] are not applied to cisgender young people receiving gender-affirming care."