So, there has been a great deal of focus on the £122m of gowns sold by PPE Medpro. They were purchased for only £46m and never used by the NHS. 🧵
But PPE Medpro also sold us on 30 May 2020 IIR facemasks for £81m some of which were manufactured by a company called Hunan Eexi.
Both the date (30 May) and the manufacturer (Hunan Eexi) were important. The date, which can be seen from published documents, is important because PPE prices were fluctuating (although were much more stable by late May). I have unpublished spreadsheets showing the manufacturer.
I can also see from those spreadsheets the unpublished per unit prices we bought the IIR facemasks manufactured by Hunan Eexi for from PPE Medpro: 38.5p each.
I can also see that several weeks later, on 17 May 2020, we bought IIR facemasks, again from Hunan Eexi, from Brandology for only 14.5p per unit. (The manufacturer and per unit price come from my spreadsheet.) This is less than half of the 38.5p per unit price we paid PPE Medpro
And I can also see that four days earlier, on 26 May, we bought IIR facemasks, again manufactured by Hunan Eexi, from Blueleaf for only 20.1p each. (The contract value published by DHSC is wrong, and the manufacturer and per unit price come from my spreadsheet.)
None of this is denied by DHSC - the allegations have been put to it - but in short you and I paid PPE Medpro for IIR facemasks made by Hunan Eexi around double the price we bought them for from other suppliers just days before and just days after.
We know from a Sunday Times report that PPE Medpro is being investigated for possible bribery, although we don't know who they bribed.
We also know that Ministers - Matt Hancock and Michael Gove - are briefing newspapers that (precious darlings) they were bullied by Michelle Mone into awarding PPE Medpro contracts either at staggering mark-ups,(gowns) or at double the prices we were paying others (facemasks).
Who knows how the story ends. But it is a very peculiar line for Hancock and Gove to take in the context of apparent criminal bribery investigations: that they were bullied into giving her £200m of public money. Really?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We can see that the lobbying was in respect of a lateral flow test company.
And we know that the lobbying was successful in that it caused Jacqui Rock, the Chief Commercial Officer, to put pressure on her junior staff to help Mone's company.
Jacqui Rock, Chief Commercial Officer of Test and Trace, here making a very stern case to colleagues for Michelle Mone after Mone kicked off to Matt Hancock and Michael Gove.
So Michelle Mone kicks off to Gove and Hancock. How does Jacqui Rock get to know about that? You have to assume they or their offices tell Jacqui Rock and ask her to help Michelle Mone out...
If that's right - and it's hard to think of another explanation - why are Gove and Hancock keen to help her out? Is it because she is a Tory Peer? Is it because companies closely connected to PPE Medpro have made donations to the Tory Party? Does she hold some dirt on them?
That's not the only problem with Hancock's alleged diary entries.
For example, his alleged entry of 16 July says: "the virus is primarily being brought in by staff, not by elderly people who've been discharged from hospital."
"more than 7mn people are waiting for non-urgent, or elective, treatment. At the same time, key standards for cancer care and A&E waiting times are being missed by record margins." on.ft.com/3F3PdQe
I'm very pleased to say, @GoodLawProject is opening an office in Scotland, so we can meet our obligations to our Scottish supporters. We're advertising for a Scottish lawyer and an external affairs manager.
I've explained here why it makes sense for us, for our supporters, and (we think) for all those who care about the rule of law in Scotland and throughout the United Kingdom. scotsman.com/news/politics/…
Thank you to Alistair Grant and @TheScotsman for giving it such a good show.
This is exactly what many UK Government Ministers are doing. The High Court said it was lawful, we think remarkably, and we are waiting to hear from the Court of Appeal whether it agrees.
Here are the transcripts of our hearing before the Court of Appeal for those who are interested: glplive.org/67y (Day 1) and glplive.org/sli (Day 2). Some extracts follow...
In this exchange the Master of the Rolls - the Head of the Civil Court of Appeal - asked whether he should declare as unlawful a thing that lots of Ministers were doing.