A thread on #forensic toxicology, in particular the continuing problems with actually getting things tested in England and Wales /1
On the 12th October 2021 I made a FOI (Freedom of Information) request to all 43 Police Forces in England Wales following comments made by @HMICFRS in a document titled "Roads Policing: Not optional
An inspection of roads policing in England and Wales" justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmicfrs/wp-con… /2
@HMICFRS So I asked the police several questions (below). I got a response TODAY from a police force 14 months after asking for it, and within it was a set of responses which just waves massive red flags /3
@HMICFRS Over three years ago a limit was placed on every police force, by @PoliceChiefs, on toxicology submissions they could send to a #Forensic Science Provider for analysis, The cap is still in place. There is no end in sight.
they said that in 2019 they didn't drop any prosecutions because the proseuction time limit had been missed for lack of toxicology testing. It would appear all samples in 2019 were being tested within the statutoary time limit /6
they have a process in place when they take more than the capped number of samples in a week which is laughably, just holding onto the sample until you can submit them. /7
they admit that they have a process in place when they take more than the capped number of samples in a week which is simply just holding onto the sample until they can submit them. /7
This leads me to believe that the reason they have a process for dealing with a weekly tox caseload being over the capped limit is that this has happened in the past and is likely to happen in the future /8
But what if this happens every week, or they get a seasonal surge in cases or from big events like football matches or festivals? It must follow that prosecutions will inevitably be dropped. /9
Perhaps they are already, and perhaps this force is not alone. This is where the police are now THREE YEARS into a forensic toxicology crisis in England and Wales. /10
I know journalists follow me on twitter interested in forensic stuff, I am giving you a shovel and I'm showing you where to dig. /9 /ends
I've been asked why the govt announcements of new austerity measures is so bad for private #forensic science providers /1
it should be obvious but I'll try and spell it out, here's the percentage change in external spend on forensic science by police forces 2011-2020, it's sort of a measure of volumes submitted to forensic science providers, [sort of - data provided police forces rarely clear] /2
when cuts hit police forces, they do everything they can to protect their internal spend, they call it protecting the front line, but somehow we still have 43 forces, with 43 chief constables and 43 PCCs/mayors. They cut external spend to the bone, including £ to private FSPs /3
thread - Future state of #forensic science provision in england and wales, a tale of three reports /1
TLDR - after over a decade of disasterous forensic crises, police forces finally move from denial to acceptance on the change curve, waving the white flag, telling the government they're unable to manage forensic science nationally* and ask for help
*England and Wales - /2
House of Lords report publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201719/ld… recommend a National Institute for Forensic Science and a Forensic Science Board both independent from policing /3
I've had some time to read this now and am able to share my views on it, not sure how long this thread will be, I will unroll it at the end. Firstly an introduction to this document - what is it? It's a review requested by @PoliceChiefs into @TFProgramme and @FCNnetwork /1
@PoliceChiefs@TFProgramme@FCNnetwork AFAIK you won't find this document on the internet atm last time I visited @PoliceChiefs website it wasn't in their publication list. I'm very grateful to @PoliceChiefs for providing it to me via FOI, which they did speedily and without any quibble whatsoever. /2
@PoliceChiefs@TFProgramme@FCNnetwork I came across its existence via a very simple FOI request to PCCs asking them had they joined @FCNnetwork , Norfolk and Suffolk mentioned it in their response /3
1/ Thanks to all who shared their views of @CharterForSci with me, I'm not a member so I really appreciate the frankness of the responses. I'm still going through them. Thread.
@CharterForSci 2/ I thought I'd share my views of the society as a non-member because with a new CEO imminent there is an opportunity for the soc to reappraise itself and its role. TLDR - it needs radical change to survive.
3/ I was a member of the society up to it becoming a professional body. I enjoyed the fun meetings, even presented at a couple and getting a copy of S&J. The professional route it took, wasn't for me.
starting to work my way through #DanielMorgan report, will post as I go through but likely without comment at this stage. Remember some #forensic work dates back to 1987 and should be judged accordingly. /1