Joe Regalia Profile picture
Dec 6, 2022 11 tweets 4 min read Read on X
When imagining the best legal writers, you might think of big names at big firms.

But small firms have powerhouses, too.

Case in point: A ridiculously good brief penned by a plaintiff's attorney at the boutique Hilton Parker LLC.

Check this out. 1/X
In the introduction:

☑️ You need no background to get into the story.

☑️ Facts do the heavy lifting instead of opinions.

☑️ Readers aren't bogged down by case law.

☑️ Storytelling is center stage (as are emotional facts); sentences are about actors carrying out actions.
After those two warm-up paragraphs make the legal pitch, the lawyers weave in their emotional one.

Once you've explained how the law favors you, include the why—why would adopting your position be a good thing?
Do the hard work for readers by explaining first before making them juggle the details and complexity.

Notice how the first sentences throughout the brief dish up the specific, persuasive points (rather than bland topic sentences).
Examples are a superpower. Need to illustrate a complicated legal doctrine? Share a quick hypothetical or emblematic case.

Need to show your readers the line drawn by the law? Share an example of both when the law is satisfied and when it's not.
Need to drive home a critical point? Share several examples that build to a single conclusion.
Then there's the small-picture style.

In this example, notice how the lawyers use active voice to paint the opposing party as a bad actor, and they use passive voice to put the victim on the receiving end of those bad acts.
The lawyers use concrete verbs throughout the brief.

Verbs are an easy way to make your writing simpler, easier to understand, and more forceful.
Simple sentences sell. The same goes for familiar, everyday language that we can all process without effort. Many of the sentences in this brief require little to no punctuation because they are so simple.
Check out the whole brief here. drive.google.com/file/d/1P-iXiK…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joe Regalia

Joe Regalia Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @writedotlaw

Jun 20
Lawyers write a lot of emails. Client updates. Partner questions. Research summaries. Scheduling notes.

And because email moves fast, many legal emails create more work than they should.

The best legal emails do something different: 🧵
They reduce the reader’s effort. They tell the reader, early, what the message is about, why it matters, and what should happen next.

Then they organize the details so the reader can find what they need without digging.

Here are a few ways to do that: (2/7)
➡️ Start Where the Reader Starts

Before anyone reads your email, they see the subject line. Make it useful.

A subject line like “Update,” “Quick question,” or “Thoughts?” does not give the reader much.

A better subject line gives them the matter, purpose, and timing. (3/7) Image
Read 7 tweets
May 27
Legal tech used to be something most lawyers could safely ignore.

You needed an email. You needed PDFs. You needed to survive the firm’s document-management system. But the machinery underneath? That could stay with IT.

In the age of AI, that’s no longer an option. 🧵
AI now touches legal research, contract review, litigation strategy, legal writing, firm operations, and law school classrooms.

Lawyers do not need to become engineers, but they do need a working vocabulary.

So here are the AI concepts every lawyer should know by now: (2/10)
1️⃣ Artificial intelligence is the broad category.

It covers tools that do tasks we associate with human intelligence: spotting patterns, classifying information, predicting outcomes, recognizing images, generating language, and more. (3/10) Image
Read 10 tweets
Apr 11
Most lawyers research in a straight line.

They find the statute. They find the leading cases. They pull a few quotations. Then they start explaining why their facts fit.

That works sometimes. It just does not take you very far. 🧵
The lawyers who do exceptional work use authority differently.

They do not treat it as a pile of answers.

They treat it as evidence. Something to test. Something to pressure. Something to compare, narrow, widen, flip, and question. (2/7)
That shift matters because the hard part of legal analysis usually is not finding some authority.

It is figuring out what that authority is really doing, what it leaves open, and how to explain that clearly enough that a judge sees it too.

A few moves make that possible: (3/7)
Read 7 tweets
Apr 4
We use commas throughout our writing, but many legal writers place them where they aren’t needed.

Others remove them from phrases or clauses even when they are necessary to avoid ambiguity.

Let’s break down the rules for when to use commas—and when to leave them out. 🧵
First, use commas to separate two independent clauses (full sentences) with a coordinating conjunction.

✅ Joe went to Saipan, and he loves reading. (2/8)
Do not use commas to join two full sentences without a conjunction (also called a comma splice).

❎ Joe went to Saipan, he likes to read. (3/8)
Read 8 tweets
Mar 4
Agents are changing the game for lawyers.

If you’re still thinking about “prompt engineering” as a spell-casting exercise, you’re already behind.

Let’s slow down and get clear on what’s actually happening. 🧵
An agent is a system that can break a task into sub-tasks, decide what to do next, evaluate intermediate outputs, and revise its own work.

Instead of one prompt and one answer, you get a loop.

Think less “question and answer” and more “junior associate with a workflow.” (2/7)
The new reality: workflow > wording.

When you’re using an agent, the real leverage is upstream and downstream:

What materials you feed it, how the task is staged, what checkpoints exist, who verifies what, what tools it can access, and what it is forbidden to do. (3/7) Image
Read 7 tweets
Feb 27
The Supreme Court just heard a major case: whether the President can use a 1977 emergency-powers statute to impose tariffs.

The private respondents—represented by Neal Katyal and a team of elite advocates—filed a merits brief that reads like a legal writing masterclass.

🧵
☑️ Open By Telling a Story, Not Stating a Rule

Most lawyers launch their briefs with procedural history or legal standards.

The best legal writers do something different—they tell a story first. Before readers can care about your rule, they need to care about the stakes. (2/6) Image
☑️ Turn Your Opponent’s Own Words Into Your Best Evidence

There’s no more devastating move in legal writing than using the other side’s own words against them.

When your opponent concedes a point, don’t let it slide by—put it center stage. (3/6) Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(