Since the "crunchy to alt-right pipeline" is a conversation, people may be interested in the longer history of the white power movement's investment in crunch (crunchiness) (1)
All the way back in the 1970s and '80s, white power women (in the Klan, skinhead groups, Christian Identity churches, and beyond) were interested in a bunch of things you might think of as crunchy: (2)
These include organic farming, macrobiotic diet, paganism, avoiding fluoride, traditional midwifery (3)
Someone could write a great book on whether all of this was 1) genuine belief 2) a way to recruit from the leftist fringe that was also anti-state and was very crunchy or 3) (my bet) a mix of both) (4)
The Klan, the white power movement, the militant right, the alt-right have all been opportunistic social movements. That means they have always tacked to the prevailing cultural winds and taken advantage of whatever recruitment avenues were available. Crunch is this now (5)
However, and this is a big however, this OF COURSE does not mean that crunchiness is the same thing as being in or being vulnerable to extremism. What it is, is a window of opportunity being manipulated and exploited BY extremists (6)
If you are crunchy and not an extremist and feel offended by this, well, yeah, you should. It's an attempt to manipulate you into an ideology. (7)
(The place that this started in the most recent iteration of the movement is, I suspect, in antivaccination--not covid antivaxxing, but the anti-measles and anti-childhood vaccinations discussions in mom groups.) (8)
It's worth learning about how this worked in the earlier period to understand what's going on here. There's a chapter on this in Bring the War Home amazon.com/Bring-War-Home…. You should also check out @seywarddarby's Sisters in Hate and Kathleen Blee's Women in the Klan (9)
This is also a really good example of how the white power/militant right is not just men marching in the street, it's also women sharing antistatist cultural materials through social networks. (10, end)
By request: "crunchy" is a cultural identity around clean food, avoiding chemicals and toxins, and natural foods and medicines. It's got a wide continuum ranging from people who, say, avoid red dye #3 all the way to people who avoid ANY preservative, additive, etc. (11)
It is brilliantly satirized and loved here: buzzfeednews.com/article/katien… and if you're following this, she is definitely NOT alt-right, just a hilarious crunchy mom (12)
PS if any aspiring historians want to write that dissertation/book, I would be really excited to read your application to @NorthwesternU
"Crunchy" like granola.
Also, in the '80s, if you lived in a white separatist compound, you had two sets of likely neighbors: farmers (we know a lot about white power and the farms crisis) and hippies (no book about this yet)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A thread of other things that have involved tents, assembly, and sound amplification at Northwestern and on Deering Meadow @thedailynu. Here is an action demanding the safe return of hostages taken by Hamas on Oct 7
Regarding the argument that a peaceful demonstration restricts campus access: a couple of weeks ago, an anti-gay, anti-feminist, antiabortion and ultraconservative group picketed Northwestern's campus. They had a very bad bagpipe player and a bunch of banners. (1)
Gay students, trans students, women students all had to walk past these dudes and their bagpipe to get to class. They were not removed, even though they were first, disrupting class and more with the stupid bagpipe and (2)
Holding signs that directly smeared and attacked members of protected groups. That is not a Title IX violation. That's part of free speech. (3)
Good morning! The original post is still up, so I gather that person is interested in rage clicks rather than engaging on anything. But I do want to take a moment to reply to a few real things that came up in this discussion: (1)
I don't agree that the only topic invited speakers can discuss right now is the ongoing catastrophe in Israel and Palestine, particularly because the white power movement is going strong in the meantime. (2)
Understanding the long history of how the state has and has not responded to far-right extremism is critical context to the present moment. Understanding how to tell this story beyond the ivory tower is important. (3)
Hi there! Just wanted to clear this up: this was not a speaking gig, but part of a panel on the intersections between public-facing historical scholarship and historically informed journalism. (1)
Certainly no one was "paying her to tell them how to do history." Northwestern already does history. Maddow's new book, Prequel, is of interest because it engages archival work and historiography for a public audience. (2)
I'm interested in the assumptions here and in other tweets, because they reflect a major set of misunderstandings. Personally, I'm interested in how to reach a broader readership with the critically important historical research of our department. (3)
I'm getting a lot of these in my feed today, so just to clear it up: yes, the Klan was started by Democrats in the 1860s. No, that does not mean that the Klan today is related to the Democratic Party. The Klan today is part of the white power movement and has links to the GOP.
Yes, the Nazis in Germany were called "National Socialist." No, that does not mean that they were "socialist" in the way we use that word today. They were fascist.
Which other ones should I do? Just your friendly neighborhood historian trying to nudge things back on the rails
Breaking: along with the scrawls on the weapon (reference to the Christchurch shooting), the Jacksonville shooter wore a Rhodesian flag patch. This is another, definitive tie to the white power movement (1) nbcnews.com/news/us-news/r…
Dylann Roof also wore a Rhodesian flag patch in photos taken before his shooting at the AME Church in Charleston in 2015. This is one example of old, old symbols of the organized white power movement being used by young people today (2)
Rhodesia became Zimbabwe in 1980, so Rhodesia hasn't been a country during the lifetime of these shooters. Instead, it has been a symbol (3)