Post

More from @julie_kelly2

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

@julie_kelly2

Dec 31, 2025

NEW: Jack Smith's transcript released.

🧵on his misrepresentations, falsehoods, and straight up lies told by the special counsel to House Judiciary Committee on Dec 17.

Smith had no evidence that any of the so-called "classified documents" he claimed to have found were in boxes temporarily stored in MAL ballroom or bathroom after the president left the White House.

Lie #2:

Smith was extremely aware of the 2024 election calendar--which is why he took what he himself described as the "extraordinary" step in asking the Supreme Court to bypass the DC appellate court--the next normal step-- in considering Judge Chutkan's Dec. 2023 order denying all forms of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution and take up the immunity question immediately. (SCOTUS denied his request, Chutkan's order was upheld by 3-judge panel in Feb. 2024, which was then considered by SCOTUS in April. On July 1, 2024, SCOTUS issued its decision providing for a broad swath of immunity for acts in office, resulting in a major gutting of Smith's J6 indictment.)

Lie #3: That the unarmed protest at the Capitol on Jan 6 was an "attack" incited by the president and the still unsubstantiated allegation that 140 officers were injured by protesters.

Keep in mind: Smith's J6 indictment was four counts: two related to 1512(c)(2)--a corporate fraud statute unlawfully used in J6 cases according to SCOTUS in the Fischer decision--and two other VERY vague conspiracy counts, conspiracy to defraud and conspiracy against "rights."

Read 7 tweets

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

@julie_kelly2

Nov 19, 2025

Hearing about to start in Jeb Boasberg courtroom as the embattled judge resumes contempt proceedings against the Trump DOJ related to Alien Enemies Act
declassified.live/p/the-contempt…

Boasberg says appellate court gave him permission to "go forward" with another contempt inquiry.

Authorized to pursue a criminal contempt factual finding against the Trump DOJ, which he is "preparing" to do as he did "seven months ago." (His April 2025 probable cause finding was vacated but the appellate court kicked the matter back to him to start over.

Boasberg says there are "new developments" since his first determination and raises allegations by Erez Reuvini, the so called DOJ "whistleblower" who accused former acting DAG Emil Bove of saying the DOJ might have to say "fuck you" to the courts. Boasberg says Reuvini might be called as a witness as the judge plans to require testimony from various parties.

"I believe justice requires me to move promptly on this."

Lee Gelernt, ACLU attorney representing illegal Venezuelans covered by AEA.

DOJ prosecutor - "the government objects to criminal contempt proceedings." Boasberg immediately grills prosecutor as to whether he believes the full DC appellate court gave him permission to restart contempt inquiry.

"I will be going forward with it," Boasberg.

Boasberg says he will seek testimony from those who "defied" his order to return planes carrying AEA subjects on the evening of March 15. The problem for Boasberg is the directive represented an "oral order" that was not reflected in his later written order.

He wants proposals from both sides by Monday on how to proceed including a list of witnesses in his fact finding exercise including Reuvini and Drew Ensign, the DOJ who represented the government during early stage of litigation.

"I certainly intend to find out what happened that day."

Read 5 tweets

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

@julie_kelly2

Nov 10, 2025

On his radio show today, Glenn Beck appears to walk back The Blaze’s audacious outing of the alleged J5/6 pipe bomber.

He refused to mention the individual’s name on air and said “a match is not guilt, comparison is not proof.”

There’s more…

After recklessly putting this individual’s name out in the public last week and endangering her safety, Beck now insists that she must be protected and claims she was low man on the totem pole in any inside operation. Not what was being said last week when story was pitched:

“If the story is true.”

Now I’ve been told for days that no one can raise questions about the veracity of the piece or express doubt over the identification of this individual.

🤷🏼‍♀️

(Btw this individual works campus security for CIA. She’s not exactly a top tier official.)

Read 4 tweets

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

@julie_kelly2

Oct 31, 2025

Here’s the nondisclosure order signed by Jeb Boasberg in May 2023 prohibiting Verizon from notifying several US senators and one House member that Jack Smith had subpoenaed their phone records. Verizon complied with the subpoenas and NDOs with the exception of Ted Cruz.

Important to note what Boasberg claims here. In order to authorize an NDO in a tech related subpoena, a judge must determine one of five factors according to Stored Communications Act.

What Boasberg alleged is that sitting Republican lawmakers might break the law if notified of the subpoenas.

He is a lunatic and must be removed from the bench. This is the CHIEF JUDGE of the DC district court.

Subpoena:

Pathetic response by Verizon

Read 5 tweets

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

@julie_kelly2

Oct 19, 2025

https://twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1131986605399576577

Jim Comey just added Michael Dreeben to his criminal defense team.

Dreeben most recently represented Jack Smith in the SCOTUS immunity case. (Safe to say Dreeben lost.)

But Dreeben's dirty hands are all over Robert Mueller's investigation, too. He is clearly conflicted 🧵

https://twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1131986605399576577

Dreeben played a key role not just on Team Mueller but he also is directly tied to Comey's involvement in developing the obstruction case against the president--recall Comey admitted the reason he leaked the content of his secret Flynn memo was to prompt the appointment of a special counsel, which happened the day after the NYT leak...
x.com/JohnWHuber/sta…

In 2023, Dreeben bragged about his lead role in the Mueller witch hunt; the "speed" at which the investigation proceeded; and how he was responsible for overseeing the production of Vol II of Mueller report, which addressed potential obstruction charges against the president.

If I were the DOJ, this guy would be toward the top of a government witness list. So how can he represent Comey when he likely will be questioned as part of the obstruction/false statements case against him?

cafe.com/insider-podcas…

Read 4 tweets

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

@julie_kelly2

Oct 5, 2025

So in 48 hours, Judge Karin Immergut (Trump) determined the president acted unconstitutionally in federalizing and deploying Natl Guard troops to protest Portland ICE facility; claimed the move violated Oregon's 10th Amend rights; and concluded there was no "rebellion" taking place to justify the president's order.

If you read carefully how Immergut described illegal immigrants, you might pick up a slight bias...as well as her claims of "mostly peaceful" protests:

The way federal judges so casually downplay examples of criminal behavior represents another part of the escalating crisis in the judicial branch. Even if you take the word of local law enforcement--Immergut's pooh-poohing of sustained violence to any degree is stunning:

Immergut--relying heavily on determinations made by Judge Charles Breyer in a similar lawsuit in California--decides on her own that no "rebellion" is underway.

I mean, surely Immergut is aware of attacks on ICE agents and facilities in other cities including Los Angeles and Chicago...right?

Her arrogance here reminds me of the words of Judge Andrew Oldham of the 5th Circuit in his dissent in an Alien Enemies Act opinion. Oldham repeatedly warned of judicial overreach in matters exclusive to the executive branch:

Oldham: "It transmogrifies the least-dangerous branch into robed crusaders who get to playact as multitudinous Commanders in Chief."

Immergut LARPing:

Read 4 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @julie_kelly2

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!