In a new book written by Bulgarian investigative journalist Anna Zarkova, Assen Yordanov, founder of the website Bivol, describes how #JulianAssange selected him to work on the WikiLeaks documents about Bulgaria, Serbia and (North) Macedonia.
While Yordanov humourously refers to the important role that a bottle of rakia played, he is adamant:
"Assange won't let you access the WikiLeaks database without first checking to make sure that you are a serious investigative journalist. He had studied my investigations..."
Yordanov says that Assange was "the first person to lift the curtain on how decisions are made about the fates of entire nations and states."
Also: "Assange's files were very influential in Bulgaria. They revealed what [former PM] Boyko Borissov is about."
About the courage of Julian Assange:
"They destroyed him and he is aware of that. When I visited him, he told me, 'I know that I'm sacrificing my life, that I don't have a future. But I do what I believe in; that is my choice.'"
Yordanov himself has also been smeared, subjected to lawsuits, betrayed by colleagues and even by his 1st wife, an actress forced by the authorities to change her Turkish name - she turned out to be an informer for State Security pre-1989. He survived two assassination attempts.
He says that recruiting sources is key to his methods. He even admits to blackmailing them with secret recordings of how they approached him the first time they wanted to get some info out. I say this because much is made in the Assange indictment of how he 'encouraged' Manning.
The author of the book, Anna Zarkova, had acid thrown on her face in the 90s. I remember this event from my childhood. She, too, tells Assange's story with sympathy and admiration. But I was sad to learn of the untimely death of another harassed journalist, Maria Nikolaeva.
Nikolaeva is from Burgas like Yordanov and had worked with him. I knew of her from a single long investigation that touched on a personal interest of mine. I'd wondered whether I should contact her with tips, but by then she had been driven out of the big - or all - newspapers...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
From the 2020 closing submissions by the prosecutors in USA v. Assange, I learned of some rather shocking European jurisprudence which says that extradition, esp. of aliens, is a simple administrative matter and not covered by Art. 6(1) of the ECHR (right to fair proceedings). 🧵
But even worse is the way the US justified the potential denial of First Amendment rights to Assange by invoking that case law, cited in a Supreme Court judgment: "extradition is a case in point-only British nationals are allowed to rely upon Article 6. Foreign nationals are not"
Everyone knows that citizens enjoy certain rights that non-citizens don't have (entering the country as they please, social benefits, etc.). Free speech, nonetheless, is universally guaranteed. Moreover, it's the height of arrogance to claim that a constitutional protection...
#Iraq20YearsOn I was a freshman at Davidson College, NC, when, just a week before the war started, Dr James Zogby organized a videoconference between a group of Davidson students and students from Baghdad University. The Americans were divided about the war, the Iraqis weren't.
They talked sanctions, the Kurds, WMDs. And freedom. "Don't you want to change at least some things around you?" asked the US kids. The Iraqis were reluctant to criticize the gov, but 1 girl said: of course we do, but it's hard to think abt that when you expect the bombs to drop.
The college yearbook: "Hopefully by the time this book is published Iraq will be a free country, so that next time we talk with Baghdad, it will be a completely open discussion."
Nothing normal or fair about the proceedings against #JulianAssange.
His legally privileged material was taken by Ecuador/the US. Requests by lawyers were ignored. The UN Special Rapporteur on Privacy wasn't allowed to be present during the seizure.
In addition to that, "the one record of his entire archive has been taken." Assange can't reconstruct the precise history of events in 2010-11, e.g. relevant communications with the other people at WikiLeaks or with media partners.
Gareth Peirce also writes that the allegations of harm were made "in the most sweeping terms," so that no defence lawyer can ever trace them to specific individuals in order to discover whether or not they were exposed to danger. Any finding is by accident.