Share this page!

Maybe Scrolly?
TheLegalProcess Profile picture
Twitter logo
Dec 10 • 23 tweets • 7 min read
🚨Incoming -

Harmeet @pnjaban firm takes the helm for @AbrahamHamadeh contest action

27 page complaint - reviewing now
Summary of issues
1/2
2/2
Abe Election Contest | General allegations
1/n
Abe Election Contest | General allegations
2/n
Abe Election Contest | General allegations
3/n
Abe Election Contest | General allegations
4/n
Abe Election Contest | General allegations
5/n
Abe Election Contest | Ballot Duplication Errors, Electronic Adjudication Errors
6/n
Abe Election Contest | Electronic Adjudication Errors (cont)
7/n
Abe Election Contest | Electronic Adjudication Errors (cont)
8/n
Abe Election Contest | Unverified Early Affidavit Signatures
9/n
Abe Election Contest | Registration Errors
10/n
Abe Election Contest | COUNT I (Maricopa only): Erroneous Count of Votes and Election Board Misconduct: Wrongful Disqualification of Provisional & Early Ballots
1/n
Abe Election Contest | COUNT I (Maricopa only)
(cont)
2/n
Abe Election Contest | Count II (Maricopa only): Erroneous Count of Votes and Election Board Misconduct: Wrongful Exclusion of Provisional Voters
1/n
Abe Election Contest | COUNT III: Erroneous Count of Votes: Inaccurate Ballot Duplications
1/n
Abe Election Contest | COUNT IV: Illegal Votes and Erroneous Count of Votes: Improper Ballot Adjudications
1/n
Abe Election Contest | COUNT V - Illegal Votes: Unverified Early Ballots
1/n
Abe Election Contest | COUNT V - Illegal Votes: Unverified Early Ballots (cont)
2/n
Abe Election Contest | Demand for Relief
1/n
Abe Election Contest | Demand for Relief (cont)
2/n
Abe Election Contest | End of Complaint Text.
Exhibits excluded

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with TheLegalProcess

TheLegalProcess Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ALegalProcess

TheLegalProcess Profile picture
Dec 11
Some additional notes on @AbrahamHamadeh election contest, now led by @pnjaban team:

As in the initial lawsuit, the very first sentence of the Complaint makes clear that Abe is not alleging fraud, manipulation, or other intentional wrongdoing.
🧵🔽
1/21 Image
This is not a 2020 style “Dominion-controlled-the-voting-machines“ case. No one has to prove the machines were configured to switch votes, or that they were connected to the Internet, or indeed, prove any manipulation of results out of fraud. They don’t have to.
2/21
This case is all about the "competence failures" of election officials – primarily in Maricopa – that resulted in the unlawful denial of the franchise to a material number of voters.
For this reason, the framing is purely around administrative misconduct -
3/21
Read 21 tweets
TheLegalProcess Profile picture
Dec 11
As Abe's complaint points out - only hours after Gates tells voters to "stay where you are and wait for a tabulator to come online" - his attorneys were "vociferously" opposing the RNC emergency action to extend voting hours.

And a Maricopa judge sided w/Maricopa

Why?
🧵1/8 Image
Abe’s Complaint doesn't speculate, but fact that the county opposed extending the polling hours to address a problem over which the county had control tells me that the county was not acting with the "due and reasonable care" required of election administrators
2/8
A few extra hours to let people “stay where you are and wait for a tabulator to come online” would have been a reasonable accommodation.
But no.
The county did not want to admit to even the smallest possibility that they had a serious problem on Election Day

3/8
Read 8 tweets
TheLegalProcess Profile picture
Dec 9
Pretty sure this constitutes a slam dunk unfair business practice in just about any state.
Washington:
Arizona
Read 4 tweets
TheLegalProcess Profile picture
Nov 10
Astonishingly, Maricopa Board of Sups has NO plans to meet and confer until Nov 14, despite becoming a laughingstock in last 2 days.

Likelihood they are discussing the issues right now - on burner phones and apps - without calling a public meeting?

OML violations? 🧵
1/6 Image
Get this - the last time Board met to discuss the upcoming election was 10/31 - but they used cover of legal advice exception to Open Meeting Law...

so you will NEVER know what they discussed...unless the @arizonaago investigates to compel disclosure
2/6 Image
Why the closed door meeting to discuss "board authority" and "statutory compliance" with Scott Jarrett - your director of elections - outside law firm Polsinelli and @marcoattorney lawyers?

What advice was board seeking that it could not discuss in public?
3/6 Image
Read 6 tweets
TheLegalProcess Profile picture
Oct 5
1/ The edu-elite class is absolutely obsessed with sexuality. Whole inter-disciplinary studies are developing so that your child, too, can "transform"

So, as your children prepare college apps - let's look at a series of lectures @uarizona has in mind for them:
🧵🔽
2/ UA Professor Plemons - an anthropologist - studies the "politics and practice of transgender medicine" and is the "curator" of the sex series

She wants participants and viewers to think about "educational policy" Image
3/ Prof Kornstein (pictured) discusses his "research" into queer play and the "frontier" of children's story hours

+ how drag "disrupts binaries of truth" and thereby undermines everything you have taught your child that is now preparing to drain your savings built over decades ImageImage
Read 9 tweets
TheLegalProcess Profile picture
Aug 4
OML Update | AG issues new Open Meeting Law opinion clarifying that public bodies cannot prohibit individual board members from responding to public comments
(after call to public has ended and subject to limitations)
azag.gov/opinions/i22-0…
Rep Kavanagh submitted the question - I wish I knew the backstory because the statute is so clear on this point that I can't help but think he has a constituent who should be reading alegalprocess.substack.com
Short answer:
* Right to respond to public comment is an individual right of the board member
* Board can't override that individual's right by flat-out prohibiting member from responding
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Send Email!

:(