1/ A large part of my job is producing detailed reports for commercial clients regarding how the ongoing pandemic will affect the market in the future. Weeks, months, years.
2/ Since commercial clients are not interested in wishful thinking, the analysis I am expected to produce has to take into account a range of scenarios that government agencies are unlikely to consider.
3/ In early 2022, February I think, I posited the concept of what I termed, 'population cyclical immune dysregulation' in one of these reports. This was a *speculation* on my part, a worse-case scenario that was low-probability but high-risk.
4/ Population cyclical immune dysregulation - PCID - was what I speculated might happen if Covid-19 dysregulated the immune system of a percentage of the population, thus rendering this cohort more likely to develop secondary bacterial, viral, or fungal infections after Covid.
5/ In the context of very few countries having significant NPIs in place, so Covid-19 infection twice a year being the norm, my theory of PCID - stressing 'theory' - was that other pathogens would begin to become more prominent and present atypically.
6/ I went on to speculate that PCID could lead an inexorably downward spiral of population health: first Covid infection to secondary infection to second Covid infection to more secondary infections and so on. This would obviously place an unmanageable strain on health services.
7/ It also begs the question: do repeat Covid infections make people more likely to get another Covid infection? Could we see an acceleration of infections in 2023? An average of three a year, not two? Hopefully not.
8/ But what is increasingly, blindingly obvious to me: if we don't implement some level of NPIs until we develop second-generation high-efficacy vaccines and / or better therapeutics, we will not get off this downward spiral of plummeting overall population health.
9/ I never thought, in my lifetime, I would see an emergency department in Northern Ireland have to close its doors to new admissions because it was overwhelmed. This happened in Antrim a month ago.
10/ I never thought I would see critical shortages of children's penicillin. This is happening now.
These events are signals.
11/ If my concept of PCID is true - and I really hope it isn't - then this situation will get worse and worse and worse. There is no off-ramp as long as we allow Covid-19 to continue to transmit in the community completely freely.
12/ A combination of SARS-CoV-2 infection, secondary infections, sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection, Long Covid, and sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 induced secondary infections will continue to deplete the health of the population, in the face of reduced health care provision.
13/ We have to reduce transmission. /end.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Governments always place the maintenance of power as their first priority; opposition parties always place the attainment of power as their first priority. Political parties perceive the re-introduction of any NPIs as the kiss of death for re-election / election chances.
2/ Because of an average four-year election cycle, 'the economy' will always be viewed in a short-term manner - see point 1. The phrase 'for the economy' actually means 'for the economy until the next election'.
1/ In late 2019, a novel coronavirus emerges and begins human to human transmission. This novel coronavirus has pandemic potential, and, despite the best efforts of China to contain it, obviously becomes a pandemic. This pandemic continues.
2/ As I've mentioned before on this platform, the virus enters a world unlike any previous pandemic. First - and obviously - frequent, cheap air travel means the virus can spread rapidly globally.
3/ Second, the virus spreads in a world with a vastly higher percentage of immunocompromised people than any pandemic virus before it - including millions of people with unmedicated HIV. Already, one pandemic disease is now interacting with another.
1/ We know that SARS-CoV-2 can adversely effect the human immune system. We don't know for sure to what extent, or what percentage of infected people this happens to. I'm being as conservative as I can here.
2/ Shouldn't we at the very least be considering the hypothesis - the *hypothesis* - that the atypical behaviour of a number of pathogens is in some way connected to this?
1/n Before making historical comparisons between the duration of previous pandemics - especially the Spanish Flu - it's important to remember that the levels of both immunosuppression and immunodeficiency in the global population are significantly higher than in the past.
2/n Immunosuppressant medication was only developed in the mid-twentieth century, and antibiotics (obviously used to treat infections in the immunodeficient population, who are significantly more susceptible), were only used from the 1930s. Likewise, antifungals in the 1950s...
3/n and antivirals in the 1960s. In the absence of medications to treat infections, immunodeficient individuals were very unlikely to survive into adulthood. And, of course, the emergence of HIV in the late 1970s led to a growing population of immunosuppressed people globally.
10 things I have learned about society in the UK and Ireland since the pandemic began: 🧵
1. Ableism is baked into society. My father, who developed a seizure disorder late in life, understood this all too well. I only really understand it now.
2. Most people have shockingly low levels of both resilience and adaptability. This I always knew.
A 🧵 on resilience, especially for all of you who are still masking in public spaces and generally being as careful as you possibly can to avoid getting infected, or re-infected, with SARS-CoV-2.
Resilience is fundamentally based on the premise of leaning into the uncomfortable
2/ By masking, by avoiding indoor dining etc, you are leaning into the uncomfortable. You are able to continue to do this because you are resilient; also, the act of continuing to do so makes you even more resilient.
You are the embodiment of 'embracing the suck'.
3/ This feedback loop of ever-growing resilience is built on you suffering for a greater good. That good may be a simple utilitarian calculation: *my* health is not worth a meal indoors with strangers, for example. Or, it may be for the good of those other than yourself: