The @usda MyPlate serves as the primary educational tool for the Dietary Guidelines for Americans.

📊New CDC report: how many Americans have even heard of MyPlate? And how many tried to follow its guidance?

💣Are you ready for this?
🍽️1 https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr178.pdfhttps://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr178.pdf
The USDA MyPlate infographic was unveiled in *2011* replacing its predecessors (pyramid, pyramid with steps) that intend to convey to Americans what defines a healthy diet. They accompany the Dietary Guidelines for Americans updated every 5 yrs.

nytimes.com/2011/06/03/bus…

🍽️2
The US passively assesses the overall health of kids and adults through the @CDCgov National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) which conducts in-person vitals & diet/lifestyle assessments.

It's the same data that generates the trends in obesity & diet:

🍽️3 https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/new_nhanes.htmhttps://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/new_nhanes.htm
The 2017-2020 series included these questions, asking pts whether they've heard of MyPlate, and if yes, whether they've tried following its recommendations:

Have at least half of US adults ever heard of it? Maybe more?

🍽️4 https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr178.pdf
Ehhh, lower -- Sorry. A quarter. 25% of US adults have ever *heard* of MyPlate. 😬

Women were more likely than men to have heard of it.

🍽️5 https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr178.pdf
And the big kicker -- only 8% of US adults report ever having attempted to follow its dietary guidance. LESS THAN 10% HAVE TRIED TO FOLLOW THE DIETARY GUIDELINES.

And if we're convinced pts over estimate their healthiness, then 8% is likely an OVERestimate.

🍽️6
Ok but maybe Americans aren't familiar with "MyPlate" but are still eating consistently with its recommendations through policy etc.?

Nope. Not really.

Health Eating Index (HEI) has been around for decades as a metric of guidelines adherence.

Max score is 100. Look:

🍽️7 https://fns-prod.azureedge.us/sites/default/files/media/file
Bottom line, MyPlate serves to market the guidelines but most US adults are not familiar. This leads to an overall very low <10% of adults having ever intentionally followed its diet recs. But even among those who've heard of MyPlate, only a third attempted following it.

🍽️8
We also know that MyPlate is just one tool of many for the dissemination and implementation of the Dietary Guidelines.

But the HEI score trends indicate not much is happening overall, regardless of the anonymity of the MyPlate.

🍽️9
Here are some readings if you're interested in exploring the massive heterogeneity underlying the national averages. There are many more stories in here...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36235830/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16256761/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27881390/

🍽️10

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Deirdre Tobias, ScD

Deirdre Tobias, ScD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @deirdre_tobias

May 20
🥚Eggs and CVD🥚

Could there BE a more classic single food nutritional epi example? I submit that there is not!

When another egg paper recently popped up in @CircAHA I jumped at the chance to walk through some of my favorite fundamental issues with single food analyses.
Let me first remind you of "Is everything we eat associated with cancer? A systematic cookbook review" and its scathing illustration published a decade ago now by Prof Ioannidis.

Take-away: Everything is good. Everything is bad. Nutritional epi get your act together.

Noted.
Even though it's a cherry picked narrative review, his figure does actually make a valid point. But the take-home most people left with was that nutritional epi simply cannot be trusted. Measurement error. Bias. All that.
Read 26 tweets
Apr 13
Some 📝nuggets from the editor's desk:

Introduction: NEEDS to hard sell the research's importance. Why is exposure and outcome of public health interest? What gap in knowledge do you seek to address?

But authors' common mistakes -- DO NOT pitch your hypothesis based on your...
✏️Results.

Your hypothesis & study should be interesting and needed regardless of its outcome. Keep results OUT OF THE INTRO. "Statistically significant findings" should *not* be the motivation to read your paper.
✏️First one to do it.

I see it ALL the time "we did this study because no one has looked this before". (Was there a reason for that?) Don't confuse being first with *novelty*. If you're truly so cutting edge then congrats! But it's novelty should be conveyed beyond stating that.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 4
📜This comprehensive thread by lead author @KevinH_PhD on our new paper of what the modern Energy Balance Model (EBM) of obesity *is* and *is not* is a *must read*.

However - I want to emphasize a few points from the epi/population health P.O.V. that underscore the biology:

/1
Firstly, we're talking about common obesity.

And the fact that it's increased Big League, both in the US and globally.

WHY?

/2
WHY matters because identifying causes can inform what to actually DO about it.

What's the contagion? And how to remove it?

Calories are the problem, but what's the *cause* of why we're storing too many *this past century* and past few decades in particular?

/3
Read 10 tweets
Feb 4
⏰WEEKLY NUT-EPI QUIZ!

Remember: we are ultimately interested in estimating long-term habitual intake for most nutritional exposures.

Back to this figure for now:
Green dots = true intake of nutrient X for a given day
Blue line = average of nutrient X across days measured
If we have a 2 days (green dots) of accurate measurements for nutrient X we can calculate a mean and standard deviation to estimate the blue line.

Q1: If we *increase* number of days of accurately measured diet (more green dots), how does this impact our calculated mean intake?
Q2: Ok, same scenario, but how does this impact our calculated standard deviation around our mean?
Read 5 tweets
Dec 22, 2021
2/ Visit the above linked thread for some set-up. And this thread here by @kevinnbass gives further background into the motivation behind the hypothesis explored in this analysis:

Does higher LDL cause increase risk of all-cause mortality?
3/ Let me get this all out before questions. And remember that behind these survival curves are data points from actual women who died.

🙏And thank you again SO much to PIs Drs Buring & Lee, P. Ridker, S. Mora, and countless others who worked hard to accrue these data.
Read 19 tweets
Dec 2, 2021
📉Cholesterol-lowering therapies like statins are a cornerstone of preventing cardiovascular disease since the 1990s.

So with that, please join me in an epidemiologic adventure as we address an emerging alternative viewpoint that refutes the role of LDL (bad cholesterol) in CVD.
A few weeks ago social media was riled up over a controversial claim to forgo lipid-lowering therapies for elevated serum LDL in patients where metabolic parameters were otherwise normal.

One of their tweets: Image
The approach to this hypothesis appears fairly straightforward at first:

Among "metabolically normal" patients (HDL>=50, TG<100), is elevated LDLc associated with long-term CVD incidence and mortality?

But nothing is what it seems and I hope we all learn some epi along the way
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(