They say "Nothing Burger" but they mean ‘Nothing-New Burger’. It’s a tactic to avoid natural consequences.
What’s new in the #TwitterFiles is clear evidence of a governmental conspiracy to violate the 1st Amendment. And yes, we already knew it was occurring.
What we’re really seeing is a power imbalance so great that if 1) the revelation of, and 2)the evidence that proves a criminal conspiracy can be separated in time, then losses to the corrupt elite that colluded against us can be managed.
They’re ‘flaring off’ the outrage.
I won’t be surprised if the tactic turns out to have a cheeky name amongst practitioners. I’ll bet early revelations are often intentionally seeded to start the flaring off process, with “nothingburger” takes written, locked and loaded in advance.
Why is SBF free? How do the elites seem to know already what’s going to happen with him? How could they know deep the rabbit hole is in his case? They appear to have little fear of associating with him even now. Is the FTX outrage being carefully managed? nytimes.com/2022/12/01/bus…
How did the collusion in the last presidential election end up getting celebrated?
@mtaibbi, @bariweiss, @ShellenbergerMD and @elonmusk are doing a vital service. But I’d caution them, they are also participating in something that appears to have been managed. Somewhere beyond all the ‘Rehashed Browns’ lies the deeper story, and it’s bound to be a shocker.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
No one can say with certainty that Celine Dion contracted this rare disorder from a Covid “vaccine”. It could be conclusively ruled out, but not in. That said, autoimmune disorders were a clear potential from this technology. We discussed it on DarkHorse before harms were known.
We will know something if this disorder suddenly becomes substantially more common, and if the increase is in the subset of the population who we’re inoculated, assuming of course that open discussion of the pattern as allowed. And that is not a given in the current environment.
What’s clear is that censorship is a killer, especially when those doing the censoring have perverse incentives—and they always do. It is beyond time for a perfectly frank discussion of what has happened, what can be done about it, and how to make sure it never happens again.
Let’s talk about where the bodies will be buried with these new flu shots, before there are any actual bodies.
Without a mechanism to direct the mRNA to particular tissues, we must assume the mRNA will be taken up haphazardly. Expected result: auto-immune damage to vital organs.
As soon as it was clear that the Covid shots circulated around the body, they should have been pulled from the market for this reason alone. It’s totally predictable that this design flaw will cause some people to die from damage to their heart and/or major blood vessels.
We can now discuss topics like this openly on Twitter because @elonmusk has suspended the absurd “Covid Misinformation” policy.
That change is both principled and buisness savvy. In a world where truth can only be voiced on Twitter, Twitter wins.
I suspect that Sam Harris and Claire Lehman leaving is part of an attempt to delegitimize Twitter, whether Sam and Claire understand that or not. Zero is a special number, and if Twitter can’t be controlled, or closed, then it must be relegated to 2nd tier status. @elonmusk
I’d also point out that neither took their business account with them when they went. @MakingSenseHQ and @Quillette remain. So what are we to glean from their exits? Is Twitter a hell-scape or not?
I don’t accept it’s about how they were treated given how they treated others.
Let’s preempt the obvious question. How could it be part of an attempt to delegitimize Twitter if Sam and/or Claire are unwitting?
Various ways, is the answer. People are being steered by whisper campaigns and targeted propaganda, for example.
"Stochastic Terrorism" is a diabolical sleight of hand. It chills debate by hyper-criminalizing critique--If you object publicly to something (e.g. exposing kids to drag/porn, late term abortion, forced vaccination) you become responsible for the violence of strangers.
I say "hyper-criminalizing" because invoking 'terrorism' triggers an exotic legal framework, unhooking regular checks and balances, and investing incredible discretion in the executive
Obviously real terrorism involves intent. This absurd extension is a powerful, dangerous trick
The idea of "stochastic terrorism" also incentivizes false-flag violence.
If "stochastic terrorism" takes hold as a framework, wherever criticism threatens the powerful, violence can be applied to put critics in very serious, official jeopardy.
When the most powerful nation in the world reforms its voting apparatus in ways that increase opportunities for large scale fraud, we would be fools not to wonder why.
If our elections are fair, it can only be due to vigilance—evidence of substantial fraud being actively sought and not found. And that evidence must be sought by patriots empowered to find it, not partisans motivated to invent it.
We have seen the burden of proof reversed. Questioning the fairness of our insanely structured voting system (a moral duty) is portrayed by winners as evidence of a moral failure.
The absurd barring of @drrollergator from Twitter needs to be reversed. It’s now urgent as the concept of “Stochastic Terrorism” becomes central to the erosion of liberty in the US (see Scientific American piece linked here)