You're about to hear a lot about #NuclearFusion. I've followed the field for years & can offer context. Top line:
- NIF's "breakeven" does not generate more power than it consumes
- NIF is not a model for a commercial fusion reactor
- This news is a big deal all the same. 1/n
Fusion researchers measure fusion output in "Q," the ratio of power produced to power needed to maintain the fusion plasma. NIF has exceeded Q=1.
Breakeven, right? Er, the accounting is not so simple, as Charles Seife explains. 2/n theatlantic.com/technology/arc…#fusion#NIF
The power that goes into igniting a fusion pellet is much less than the total amount that NIF consumes. "Breakeven" comes nowhere close to covering all of that consumption! A useful fusion power plant would require anything from Q=5 to Q=100. 3/n en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_en…#fusion
Also: The National Ignition Facility (NIF) was not designed as prototype for a powerplant. It's a weapons test facility. It cannot quickly produce one fusion blast after another, which is what you'd need for a steady energy supply. 4/n lasers.llnl.gov/about/what-is-…#fusion#NIF
OK, so why is the NIF news a big deal?
Everyone knew breakeven fusion was possible, in principle. The challenge was working hard enough (and investing enough) to make it happen. Well, that moment is NOW. 5/n #breakeven#fusionnature.com/articles/d4158…
In 1976, the US govt looked at how long it would take to achieve practical fusion energy, given various funding scenarios. The path we've been on since then is the one labeled "fusion never."
Fusion seemed like a cool idea, but not an urgent one. 6/n #fusion#future
Achieving breakeven is an inspiration to look at what it would take to make #fusion energy practical. Can it be scaled up quickly? Can it be cost-competitive?
There are many private companies working on the problem. I talked to a bunch of them: 7/n medium.com/the-moonshot-c…
A fusion breakthrough at NIF is likely to boost support for big government projects like ITER & drive investment into the more experimental, higher-risk private efforts. That's a formula for more rapid advances. 8/n nautil.us/the-road-less-…#Fusion#Iter#NIF
Fusion would be competing with wind & solar power. But it could be an important source of base load electricity, high-density power for industry, etc. There's a need for something like fusion in the low-carbon world -- I hope it happens. 9/9 royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rs…#fusion#NIF
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Twitter is full of "wonder science" accounts, many of them full of stolen images & misinformation. The recent viral tweet about the alleged void in space offers a good case study in how to spot the fakes. 1/5
Test #1: Who is sending the tweet? Reputable researchers, journalists, and institutions identify themselves. If the account is anonymous and contains no information, you should be suspicious. 2/5
Test #2: What is the source of the information? If there is no source/link (or a generic ID like "NASA"), that's a red flag. It's also a common tactic in bot accounts that scrape or steal images from the actual creators. 3/5
The true colors of the solar system, a short thread. * First, let's start with the Sun. Can we all agree it's white to the eye?
* inspired by James O’Donoghue & Marina Koren, with some color corrections by me.
Mercury is so gray that it's tough to tell whether you are seeing pictures of it in color or black-and-white. This one is true color, seriously. blogs.agu.org/wildwildscienc…
Venus reflects 70% of the sunlight that hits it, nearly as reflective as freshly fallen snow. So yeah, it is super-white, as you can tell just by looking at it in the sky. nasa.gov/mission_pages/…
Remember the "mystery hut" spotted by China's Yutu-2 rover on the far side of the Moon? Now we've seen it up close. Behold...a Moon rock. mp.weixin.qq.com/s/VgtehRidYL8-…
Reminder: When you apply a lot of imagination to an image at the very edge of resolution, you're going to "see" all kinds of strange things. The Face on Mars was a classic of this genre.
Fortunately, the universe is full of genuine mysteries. We still don't know for sure whether there is life on Mars!
I see versions of this nonsense claim all the time. This one went hugely viral. So let's dig into the actual numbers, cars versus volcanoes. (1/x)
Human activities released 33 billion tons of CO2 in 2019. About 16% of that, or 5 billion tons, is associated with road transportation. iea.org/articles/globa…
Calculating "every car in history" isn't easy, since car use has grown enormously over the past 120 years. Being extremely conservative, the total is 20 times this year's amount, or 100 billion tons. 3/x
30 years ago, nobody knew for sure whether there were ANY planets around other stars. Today the number of confirmed planets just passed 4,000--and the variety out there is staggering. [a short thread]
A sweeping new paper (341 pages!) analyzes 426 nearby red dwarf stars. They seem to average at least 3 planets each, which translates to more than a trillion planets in the Milky Way, over 100 billion of them potentially habitable. arxiv.org/abs/1906.04644
The Gemini Planet Imager is surveying 531 bright, nearby stars. It takes direct images of their planets, showing that Jupiter-like planets are common around the types of stars that light up the night sky. news.berkeley.edu/2019/06/12/jup…